Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:14:29.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling the effect of the stage of pregnancy on milk composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. B. Coulon  and
L. Pérochon
J. B. Coulon
Affiliation:
INRA, Laboratoire Adaptation des Herbivores aux Milieux, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France
L. Pérochon
Affiliation:
INRA, Unité d'Ecopathologie, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France
Get access

Abstract

The effect of pregnancy on the fat and protein contents of milk was studied on a 414-lactation sample. One hundred and forty-nine lactations of non-pregnant cows managed under identical conditions served as controls. The difference between individual fat or protein contents of each pregnant animal and the mean corresponding values in controls was computed weekly from the week of conception. The effect of pregnancy on fat and protein concentrations began to be significant from the 20th week of pregnancy, regardless of the week of conception. It was higher in the Friesian breed than in Holstein or Montbeliarde cows. In Holstein and Montbeliarde cows, the effect of pregnancy was higher in high producing multiparous cows (+2·8 and +2·9 g/kg for fat and protein concentrations, respectively, at the 29th pregnancy week) than in primiparous or low producing multiparous cows (+2·0 and +1·4 g/kg, for fat and protein concentration, respectively). In each of these three lactation groups (Friesian, high producing multiparous Holstein and Montbeliarde cows, other Holstein and Montbeliarde cows) the following linear model

was fitted, where Y is the difference between fat or protein concentration of pregnant and non pregnant cows at a given stage (week), Pw is the pregnancy week, and a and b are parameters. This increase in milk fat and protein concentrations in late pregnancy cannot compensate the concomitant decrease in milk yield, so that fat and protein yield decreased in the same manner as milk yield during pregnancy (-77 glday and -68 glday at the 29th week of pregnancy, for fat and protein yield, respectively).

Keywords

dairy cowsmathematical modelsmilk compositionpregnancy
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , December 1998 , pp. 413 - 419
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachman, K. C., Hayen, M. J., Morse, D. and Wilcox, C. J. 1988. Effect of pregnancy, milk yield and somatic cell count on bovine milk fat hydrolysis. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 925–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, G. L. 1952. Studies on variations in the solids-not-fat concentration of milk. II. Variation due to stage in lactation. Journal of Dairy Research 19: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Rook, A. J., France, J., Dhanoa, M. S. and Gill, M. 1991. A review of empirical and mechanistic models of lactational performance by the dairy cow. Livestock Production Science 29: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilliard, Y. 1992. Physiological constraints to milk production: factors which determine nutrient partitioning, lactation persistency, and mobilization of body reserves. World Review of Animal Production 27: 20–25.Google Scholar
Convey, E. M. 1974. Serum hormone concentrations in ruminants during mammary growth, lactogenesis and lactation: a review. Journal of Dairy Science. 57: 905–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulon, J. B., Lescourret, F., Faye, B., Landais, E., Troccon, J. L. and Perochon, L. 1993. Description de la base de donnees “LASCAR”, un outil pour l'etude des carrieres des vaches laitieres. INRA Productions Animales. 6: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, J. B., Perochon, L. and Lescourret, F. 1995. Modelling the effect of the stage of pregnancy on dairy cows' milk yield. Animal Science. 60: 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eissa, H. M. and El-Belely, M. S. 1990. Sequential changes i n plasma progesterone, total oestrogens and corticosteroids i n the cow throughout pregnancy and around parturition. British Veterinary Journal 146: 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erb, R. E., Goodwin, M. M., Morrison, R. A. and Shaw, A. 0.1952. Lactation studies. I. Effect of gestation. Journal of Dairy Science. 35: 224–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faverdin, P., Hoden, A. and Coulon, J. B. 1987. Recommendations alimentaires pour les vaches laitieres. Bulletin Technique CRZV Theix, INRA 70: 133–152.Google Scholar
Guilbault, L. A., Thatcher, W. W., Collier, R. J. and Wilcox, C. J. 1985. Peripartum endocrine changes of conceptus and maternal units in Holstein heifers bearing genetically different conceptuses. Journal of Animal Science. 61: 1505–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, S., Jolivet, E. and Messean, A. 1992. La régression non line'aire. Méthodes et applications en biologie. Institut de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. 1978. Alimentation des ruminants. INRA Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique. 1989. Ruminant nutrition. Recommended allowances and feed tables (ed. Jarrige, R.). INRA and John Libbey Eurotext.Google Scholar
Masselin, S., Sauvant, D., Chapoutot, P. and Milan, D. 1987. Les modèles d'ajustement des courbes de lactation. Annales de Zootechnie 36: 171–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Rounsaville, T. R., Milligan, R. A. and Hintz, R. L. 1980. Relationship between days open and cumulative milk yield at various intervals from parturition for high and low producing cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 63: 1317–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkhie, M. R., Gilmore, L. O. and Fechheimer, N. S. 1966. Effect of successive lactations, gestation, and season of calving on constituents of cows' milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 49: 1410–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perochon, L., Coulon, J. B. and Lescourret, F. 1996. Modelling lactation curves of dairy cows with emphasis on individual variability. Animal Science. 63: 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. M., Hansen, L. B., Steuernagel, G. R. and Kuck, A. L. 1990. Variation of milk, fat, protein and somatic cells for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 73: 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spike, P. W. and Freeman, A. E. 1967. Environmental influences on monthly variation in milk constituents. Journal of Dairy Science 50: 1897–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Terqui, M., Delouis, D., Thimonier, J. and Ortavant, R. 1975. Relations entre les oestrogenes au cours de la gestation, le poids a la naissance et la croissance ulterieure des veaux de race charolaise. Compte Rendu de VAcademie Sciences, Paris D. 280: 2789–2792.Google Scholar
Wilcox, C. J., Pfau, K. O., Mather, R. E. and Bartlett, J. W. 1959. Genetic and environmental influences upon solid-not-fat content of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 42: 1132–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar