Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T22:15:20.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photoperiodism in the ewe: 1. The effect of long supplemented daylengths on the breeding activity of pregnant and non-pregnant Teeswater-Clun ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Ducker ,
C. J. Thwaites  and
J. C. Bowman
M. J. Ducker
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
C. J. Thwaites
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
J. C. Bowman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire
Get access

Summary

Daylengths of 13 or 20 hr were applied to six groups of nine ewes during the 2nd to 8th, 8th to 14th and 14th to 20th week of pregnancy. Two groups of nine non-pregnant ewes received a constant 13- or 20-hr daylength during the above experimental period. A group of 10 non-pregnant ewes which initially received a 20-hr daylength were subjected to a 13-hr daylength in the last 14 to 20 weeks of the experimental period. After parturition (26 March) all the ewes received increasing natural daylength.

The mean number of days from the onset of the experimental light treatments (17 November) to the cessation of oestrous activity did not vary significantly between the three non-pregnant groups of ewes and was on average 89 days.

Only two of the 82 ewes, both non-pregnant, exhibited oestrus prior to the longest day (22 June). The various light treatments did not significantly affect the mean dates of occurrence of the natural breeding season of the groups of ewes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 107 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ortavant, R., Mauleon, P. and Thibault, C. 1964. Photoperiodic control of gonodal and hypophyseal activity in domestic mammals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 117: 157–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. and Wood, G. F. 1960. A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Aust. vet. J. 36: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggan, L. S. 1967. Studies on fertility in sheep with special reference to artificial insemination and control of ovarian cycles. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Williams, H. L. 1967. The intensification of sheep production. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. London.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. 1949. The breeding season of the sheep with particular reference to its modification by artificial means of using light. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 39: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar