Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:27:03.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources of variation in yields and concentrations of milk solids in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Rook
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
W. J. Fisher
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Bernard Weitz Centre, Arborfield, Reading RG2 9AQ
J. D. Sutton
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Eighteen multiparous Holstein-Friesian cows were offered grass silage ad libitum and 3,6 or 9 kg dry matter per day of concentrates. Triplicate milk samples were taken at each of two daily milkings over a 28-day period and analysed for fat protein and lactose concentration. Milk yield and fat concentration were more variable than protein and lactose concentrations both between animals and between days. Sampling variation was small for all component concentrations. The main source of variation for all traits was time of milking (morning or afternoon) followed by variation between cows and by day-to-day variation. There was little linear trend with time in the data due to cows being close to peak yield. There was no evidence of cyclical variation over time for any trait. Mean weekly or monthly yields and concentrations were better predicted using samples from four rather than from two consecutive milkings but there was no further advantage from using six samples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atwal, A. S. and Erfle, J. D. 1990. Day-to-day variation in fat percent of cow's milk. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 70: 731734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, J. and Toutenburg, H. 1977. Prediction and improved estimation in linear models, chapter 1.5.4. Wiley, London.Google Scholar
Dodd, F. H. and Griffin, T. K. 1977. Milking routines. In Machine milking. Technical bulletin 1, National Institute for Research in Dairying (ed. Thiel, C. C. and Dodd, F. H.),pp. 179200. NIRD, Shinfield.Google Scholar
Kendall, M., Stuart, A. and Ord, J. K. 1983. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 3. Design and analysis and time-series. 4th ed. Charles Griffin, London.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1987. GENSTAT 5 reference manual. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lee, A. J. and Wardrop, J. 1984. Predicting daily milk yield, fat percent and protein percent from morning or afternoon tests. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 351360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1975. Maximum likelihood estimation of components of variance. Proceedings of the 8th international biometrics conference, pp. 197207.Google Scholar
Peaker, M. 1980. Influence of diet on the yields and contents of lactose and minerals in milk. In Factors affecting the yield and contents of milk constituents of commercial importance. Document 125, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, pp. 159163.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. and Castellan, N. J. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Rook, A. J., Sutton, J. D. and France, J. 1992. Prediction of the yields of milk constituents in dairy cows offered silage ad libitum and concentrates at a flat rate. Animal Production 54: In press.Google Scholar
Sporndly, E. 1989. Effects of die t on milk composition and yield of dairy cows with special emphasis on milk protein content. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 99106.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F., Neave, F. V. and Dodd, F. H. 1966. The effect of bacterial infections of the udder on the yield and composition of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Research 33: 199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar