Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T23:52:04.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of teat-size measurements or calf weaning weight as an aid to selection against teat defects in cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. E. Frisch
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Tropical Cattle Research Centre, PO Box 545, North Rockhampton, Queensland 4701, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Measurements of the median diameter of all teats were recorded within 2 days of calving on 892 cows from eight breeding lines. Teats with a median diameter of ≥35 mm were classed as bottle teats. Their incidence varied from zero in a Hereford line to 0-55 in a Sahiwal crossbred line. In all lines, except the Hereford line, bottle teats were the most important single cause of mortality, up to 2 months of age, of calves that were born alive. However, mortalities became disproportionately high only when all four teats were classed as bottle teats.

Of calves that survived to weaning, those born to cows with at least one bottle teat had heavier live weights at weaning than those born to cows without bottle teats. Consequently, more calves were selected for high growth rate as potential sires from cows with bottle teats than from cows without bottle teats. This, combined with the observation that bottle teats occurred only after at least two calvings, is likely to reduce progress towards elimination of the defect through culling. However, indirect culling of the defect through any effect on calf performance is completely ineffective and uneconomic, and it is recommended that cows be culled directly for the defect in the year in which it first appears.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Clarinobold, P. J. 1961. The use of orthogonal polynomials in the partition of chi-square. Aust. J. Star. 3: 4863.Google Scholar
Frisch, J. E. 1981. Changes occurring in cattle as a consequence of selection for growth rate in a stressful environment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 96: 2338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleddie, V. M. and Berg, R. T. 1968. Milk production in range beef cows and its relationship to calf gains. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 48: 323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. and Rendel, J. 1968. Udder development, milking rate, yield and composition of milk. In Genetics and Animal Breeding, pp. 264299. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Seebeck, R. M. 1982. Sysnova Version 9 reference manual. Tech. Pap. C.S.I.R.O. Aust. In press.Google Scholar