Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T13:46:54.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing for Uni-Dimensional Scaling of Stimuli Used in Preference Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

I R Inglis*
Affiliation:
Central Science Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Worplesdon, Surrey GU3 3LQ, UK

Abstract

Many animal preference experiments involve test stimuli that have been chosen by the experimenter to represent different strengths of a single attribute. It is assumed that the animals also scale the test stimuli along a single dimension. This paper shows how it is possible to use the ‘Unfolding Technique' developed by Coombs (1964) to check the validity of this assumption. A simple experiment is described which used Coombs' technique to verify that three visual test stimuli were ranked by laboratory rats along a single dimension. These stimuli were subsequently used in an experiment to see how different housing conditions changed rats' preferences for visual complexity.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
© 1994 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berlyne, D E 1960 Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. McGraw Hill: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, H J M, Baumans, V, Vorstenbosch, C J A H V Van, Zutphen, LFM Van and Beynen, A C 1993 Preference tests with rodents to assess housing conditions. Animal Welfare 2: 8187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, C H 1964 A Theory of Data. Wiley: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Inglis, I R and Freeman, N H 1976 Reversible effects of ambient housing stimulation upon stimulation-seeking in rats. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 28: 409419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S 1956 Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New YorkGoogle Scholar