Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T04:43:39.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare of Male and Female Broiler Chickens in Relation to Stocking Density, as Indicated by Performance, Health and Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

J A McLean ,
C J Savory  and
N H C Sparks
J A McLean*
Affiliation:
Avian Science Research Centre, Scottish Agricultural College, Ayr KA6 5HW, Scotland
C J Savory
Affiliation:
Avian Science Research Centre, Scottish Agricultural College, Ayr KA6 5HW, Scotland
N H C Sparks
Affiliation:
Avian Science Research Centre, Scottish Agricultural College, Ayr KA6 5HW, Scotland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: J.Mclean@au.sac.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to provide information relevant to the current debate concerning the optimisation of terminal stocking density for commercial broiler production. In a modern, controlled-environment house with 24 floor pens (each 11.4 m2), 4020 day-old broilers (Ross 308) were allocated to three terminal (42 days) stocking densities (28, 34 and 40 kg m-2) x two sexes x four replicates, according to a randomised block design. Group sizes varied from 130 to 208. Husbandry conditions were in accordance with normal commercial practice. Performance and behaviour were measured systematically during each of the six weeks of life, and additional measurements were made of leg health and litter condition. Data were analysed using ANOVA to determine the effects of stocking density, sex and age. The realised mean terminal stocking densities were 28.2, 33.5 and 38.5 kg m2. The main significant effects of stocking density treatment were a linear decline in food intake with increasing density during week six (the final week), and a reduced proportion of time spent panting deeply during weeks five and six at the lowest density. Increased (shallow and deep) panting shown by females in weeks two to five suggests that if thermal discomfort becomes a problem at higher stocking densities later in the growing period, it may do so earlier in females. There was no conclusive evidence from this study that broiler welfare is compromised any more at 40 than at 34 kg m−2. The fact that the proportion of time spent panting deeply in week six was considerably lower at 28 kg m2 than at 34 and 40 kg m−2 suggests that thermal comfort (and hence welfare) at this age may be improved at densities of less than 34 kg m−2. However, the significant effects of age, age x density, and age x sex on time spent panting deeply suggest that the age at slaughter and the sex of birds in single-sex flocks should be taken into account in future considerations of optimal maximum terminal stocking density.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourbroilerperformancestocking densitythermoregulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 2002 , pp. 55 - 73
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, S M, Omed, H M and Phillips, C J C 1997 The effect of a single repeated period of high stocking density on the behaviour and response to stimuli in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 76: 1655–1660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arad, Z 1983 Thermoregulation and acid-base status in the panting dehydrated fowl. Journal of Applied Physiology 54: 234–243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arad, Z and Marder, J 1983 Acid-base regulation during thermal panting in the fowl (Gallus domesticus) — comparison between breeds. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (A) 74: 125–130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessei, W 1992 The behaviour of broilers under intensive management conditions. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 56: 1–7Google Scholar
Blokhuis, H J and van der Haar, J W 1990 The effect of stocking density on the behaviour of broilers. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 54: 74–77Google Scholar
Broadbent, L A, Wilson, B J and Fisher, C 1981 The composition of the broiler chicken at 56 days of age: output, components and chemical composition. British Poultry Science 22: 385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahaner, A, Deeb, N, Yunis, R and Lavi, Y 1998 Reduced stress tolerance in fast growing broilers. Proceedings of the 10th European Poultry Conference, 21-26 June, Jerusalem, Israel pp 113–117. World's Poultry Science Association: IsraelGoogle Scholar
Classen, H L, Riddell, C, Robinson, F E, Shand, P J and McCurdy, A R 1994 Effect of lighting treatment on the productivity, health and behaviour and sexual maturity of heavy male turkeys. British Poultry Science 35: 215–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coenen, M, Schulze-Kersting, I, Zentek, J and Kamphues, J 1996 Effects of different housing conditions (stocking density) on performance of broilers and the composition of litter. Deutsch Tieraerztliche Wochenschrift 103: 79–83Google Scholar
Cravener, T L, Roush, W B and Mashaly, M M 1992 Broiler production under varying population densities. Poultry Science 71: 427–433CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, D L, Buhr, R J and Mamputu, M 1992 Beak trimming and sex effects on behaviour and performance traits of large white turkeys. Poultry Science 71: 1606–1614CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstrand, C 1993 Effects of stocking density on the health, behaviour and productivity of broilers. A literature review. Report 32. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Animal Hygiene, Skara, SwedenGoogle Scholar
El Hadi, H and Sykes, A H 1982 Thermal panting and respiratory alkalosis in the laying hen. British Poultry Science 23: 49–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elson, A 1993 Housing systems for broilers. In: Savory, C J and Hughes, B O (eds) Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-21 September, Edinburgh, UK pp 177–184. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Elwinger, K 1995 Broiler production under varying population densities — a field study. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 59: 209–215Google Scholar
European Commission Report 2000 The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal WelfareGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1992 Report on the welfare of broiler chickens. FA WC: Surbiton, UKGoogle Scholar
Farm Animal Welfare Council 1995 Report on the welfare of turkeys. FAWC: Surbiton, UKGoogle Scholar
Gaardbo Thomsen, M 1993 Influence of increasing stocking rates on performance and carcass quality of broilers. In: Savory C J and Hughes B O (eds) Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-21 September, Edinburgh, UK pp 285-287. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, M and Brackenbury, J H 1983 Ventilation, gaseous exchange and airsac gases during thermal panting in domestic fowl. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 68: 591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S H 1992 The effect of broiler stocking density on bird welfare and performance. British Poultry Science 5: 1120–1121Google Scholar
Grashorn, M A 1992 High stocking densities and incidences of leg disorders in broiler chickens. In: Whitehead C C (ed) Bone Biology and Skeletal Disorders in Poultry p 352. Carfax Publishing Company: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Grashorn, M and Kutritz, B 1991 Effect of stocking density on performance of modem broiler breeds. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 55: 84–90Google Scholar
Kestin, S C, Knowles, T G, Tinch, A E and Gregory, N G 1992 Prevalence of leg weakness in broilers and its relationship with genotype. Veterinary Record 131: 190–194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kestin, S C, Adams, S J M and Gregory, N G 1994 Leg weakness in broiler chickens, a review of studies using gait scoring. Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference, Vol II, 7-12 August, Glasgow, UK pp 203-206. World's Poultry Science Association: UKGoogle Scholar
Lewis, N J and Hurnik, F J 1990 Locomotion of broiler chickens in floor pens. Poultry Science 69: 10871093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martrenchar, A, Morisse, J P, Huonnic, D and Cotte, J P 1997 The influence of stocking density on some behavioural, physiological and productivity traits of broilers. Veterinary Research 28: 473–480Google ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food 1987 Codes of recommendation for the welfare of livestock: domestic fowls. MAFF: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M A and Kettlewell, P J 1993 Catching and transport of broiler chickens. In: Savory, C J and Hughes, B O (eds) Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, 18-21 September, Edinburgh, UK pp 219–229. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M A and Kettlewell, P J 1994 Road transportation of broiler chickens — induction of physiological stress. World's Poultry Science Journal 50: 57–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M A and Kettlewell, P J 1998 Physiological stress and welfare of broiler chickens in transit: solutions not problems! Poultry Science 77: 1803–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L B and Preston, A P 1988 Time-budgeting in meat chickens grown commercially. British Poultry Science 29: 571–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NFU Poultry Bulletin 2000 Chicken Market Quarterly (July)Google Scholar
Newberry, R C, Hunt, J R and Gardiner, E E 1988 Influence of light intensity on behaviour and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 1020–1025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, A P, Pamment, P, McBride, G and Foenander, F 1983 Some activity patterns of meat chickens. Fifth Australasian Poultry and Stock Feed Convention, 19-22 September, Adelaide, Australia pp 203–207Google Scholar
Proudfoot, F G, Hulan, H W and Ramey, D R 1979 The effect of four stocking densities on broiler carcass grade, the incidence of breast blisters, and other performance traits. Poultry Science 58: 791–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puron, D, Santamaria, R, Segura, J C and Alamilla, J L 1995 Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4: 55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pym, RAE and Solvyns, A J 1979 Selection for food conversion in broilers: body composition of birds selected for increased body weight gain, food consumption and food conversion ratio. British Poultry Science 20: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, A D, Kettlewell, P J, Mitchell, M A and Knowles, T 1998 Air movement and the thermal microclimates observed in poultry lairages. British Poultry Science 39: 469–476CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 1994 Behaviour of broilers in dependence on group size and stocking density. Proceedings of the 9th European Poultry Conference, Vol 1, 7—12 August, Glasgow, UK pp 294–295. World's Poultry Science Association: UKGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 1998 Possibilities to reduce leg disorders in broilers and turkeys (review). Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 62: 145–149Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 1999 The behaviour of broilers in response to group size and stocking density. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 64: 93–98Google Scholar
Reiter, K and Bessei, W 2000 Effect of stocking density of broilers on temperature in the litter and at bird level. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 64: 204–206Google Scholar
Richards, S A 1970 The biology and comparative physiology of thermal panting. Biological Reviews 45: 223–264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross Breeders 1999 Ross Broiler Management Manual. Ross Breeders Limited: Midlothian, UKGoogle Scholar
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 1999 Freedom Food: The RSPCA Welfare Standards for Broiler Chickens. RSPCA: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Sanotra, G S, Vestergaard, K S and Thomsen, M G 1995 The effect of stocking density on walking ability, tonic immobility and the development of tibial dyschondroplasia in broiler chicks. Proceedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 3-5 August, Exeter, UK pp 221–222. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Savory, C J 1975 A growth study of broiler and layer chicks reared in single-strain and mixed-strain groups. British Poultry Science 16: 315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholtyssek, S 1971 Zur Frage der Besatzdichtein Broilerherden. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 35: 235–239 [Title translation: The question of size and density in broiler flocks]Google Scholar
Scholtyssek, S 1974 Die Bedeutung des Futterplatzes in unterschiedlich besetzen Mastabteilen. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 38: 41–45 [Title translation: The importance of the feed place in broiler boxes with different density]Google Scholar
Scholtyssek, S and Gschwindt, B 1980 Untersuchungen zu Besatzdichte und Futterplatz in der Bodenmast von Broilern. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 44: 220–224 [Title translation: Investigations about density and feed space for broilers on deep litter]Google Scholar
Scholtyssek, S and Gschwindt-Ensinger, B 1983 Leistungsvermögen einschliesslich Befiederung und Belastbarkeit von Broilern bei unterschiedlicher Besatzdichte in Bodenhaltung. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 47: 3–8 [Title translation: Performance including feathering and stress situation of broilers in different densities on floor]Google Scholar
Shanawany, M M 1988 Broiler performance under high stocking densities. British Poultry Science 29: 43–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokal, R R and Rohlf, F J 1981 Biometry. Freeman & Co: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, P, Su, G and Kestin, S C 2000 Effects of age and stocking density on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 79: 864–870CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, A J F, Tuddenham, A, Saville, C A and Scott, G B 1993 Thermal stress on chickens in transit. British Poultry Science 34: 267–277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weeks, C A, Danbury, T D, Davies, H C, Hunt, P and Kestin, S C 2000 Effect of lameness on feeding behaviour of broilers. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W T, Fujita, M and Yamamoto, S 1999 Thermoregulatory responses and blood viscosity in dehydrated heat-exposed broilers (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Thermal Biology 24: 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar