Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T23:31:01.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Associations between open-field behaviour and stress-induced hyperthermia in two breeds of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

C Pedernera-Romano ,
JL Ruiz de la Torre ,
L Badiella  and
X Manteca
C Pedernera-Romano*
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Edifici V, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola, Barcelona, Spain
JL Ruiz de la Torre
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Edifici V, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola, Barcelona, Spain
L Badiella
Affiliation:
Servei d’Estadística, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Edifici V, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola, Barcelona, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: cecipedernera@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In sheep (Ovis aries) and other farm animals, routine husbandry procedures can cause negative emotions, such as fear, which are generally considered to reduce animal welfare. The open-field test (OFT) is the most widely used test to measure fearfulness in animals. The induction of psychological stress is often accompanied by an elevation of core body temperature, referred to as stress-induced hyperthermia (SIH) and both OFT and SIH were used in this study to measure fearfulness in sheep: the aim being to examine associations between behaviour in the OFT and the SIH response, using data from two breeds of sheep tested repeatedly over time. Twentyfour ewes from two breeds, Lacaune and Ripollesa, were tested for 10 min with all behaviours recorded throughout. Rectal temperature was measured immediately prior to the start of the test (T1) and 10 min after its completion (T2). SIH was measured as the difference between T2 and T1. Sheep were tested over three periods of three experimental days each. Ewes of both breeds showed consistent changes in behaviour in the OFT and a clear SIH response. Bleats and visits to the water bucket showed a clear pattern between rounds. Differences between T1 and T2 were found, T2 was higher than T1 suggesting that exposure to a novel arena caused SIH. Breed differences were found whereby T2 was 0.12°C higher in Ripollesa than Lacaune. These findings have implications for selection programmes, creating the possibility of selecting less fearful animals that will cope better with handling procedures that may induce fear. Further, they also demonstrate the importance of using both behavioural and physiological variables to evaluate fear.

Keywords

animal welfarefearopen-field testsheepstressstress-induced hyperthermia
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
© 2011 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakken, M, Moe, RO, Smith, AJ and Selle, GME 1999 Effects of environmental stressors on deep body temperature and activity levels in silver fox vixens (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beausoleil, NJ, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005 Sheep show more aversion to a dog than to a human in an arena test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91: 219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A 1995 Fear and fearfulness in animals. The Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 165–191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissy, A 1998 Fear and fearfulness in determining behavior. In: Grandin, T (ed) Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals pp 67–111. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A and Bouissou, M 1995 Assessment of individual differences in behavioural reactions of heifers exposed to various fear-eliciting situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boissy, A and Le Neindre, P 1997 Behavioral, cardiac and cortisol responses to brief peer separation and reunion in cattle. Physiology & Behaviour 61: 693–699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boissy, A, Fisher, AD, Bouix, J, Hinch, GN and Le Neindre, P 2005 Genetics of fear in ruminant livestock. Livestock Production Science 93: 23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwknecht, JA, Olivier, B and Paylor, RE 2007 The stress-induced hyperthermia paradigm as a physiological animal model for anxiety: a review of pharmacological and genetic studies in the mouse. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 31: 41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouwknecht, JA, Hijzen, TH, van der Gugten, J, Maes, RAA, Hen, R and Olivier, B 2001 Absence of 5-HT1B receptors is associated with impaired impulse control in male 5-HT1B knockout mice. Biological Psychiatry 49: 557–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1990 From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare. Behavior and Brain Science 13: 54–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desire, L, Boissy, A and Veissier, I 2002 Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology. Behavioural Processes 60: 165–180Google ScholarPubMed
Erhard, HW, Elston, DA and Davidson, GC 2006 Habituation and extinction in an approach-avoidance test: an example with sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99: 132–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forkman, B, Boissy, A, Meunier-Salaün, M-C, Canali, E and Jones, RB 2007 A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses. Physiology & Behavior 92: 340–374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, JA 1987 The Psychology of Fear and Stress. Cambridge Univeristy Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, M, Watanabe, T, Fujioka, T, Tan, N, Yamashita, H and Nakamura, S 2001 Modulating effects of prenatal stress on hyperthermia induced in adult rat offspring by restraint or LPS-induced stress. Physiology & behavior 73: 125–132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, II, Christiansen, F, Hansen, HS, Braastad, B and Bakken, M 2001 Variation in behavioural responses of ewes towards predator-related stimuli. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 227–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluger, MJ, O’Reilly, B, Shope, TR and Vander, AJ 1987 Further evidence that stress hyperthermia is a fever. Physiology & Behavior 39: 763–766CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minton, JE and Blecha, F 1990 Effect of acute stressors on endocrinological and immunological functions in lambs. Journal of Animal Science 68: 3145–3151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misslin, R 2003 The defense system of fear: behavior and neurocircuitry. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 33: 55–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, GP and Wood, VA 1982 Effect of differential rearing on the behavioral and adrenocortical response of lambs to a novel environment. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, RO and Bakken, M 1997 Effects of handling and physical restraint on rectal temperature, cortisol, glucose and leucocyte counts in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 38: 29–39Google ScholarPubMed
Moe, RO and Bakken, M 1998 Anxiolytic drugs inhibit hyperthermia induced by handling in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Animal Welfare 7(4): 97–100Google Scholar
Oka, T, Oka, K and Hori, T 2001 Mechanisms and mediators of psychological stress-induced rise in core temperature. Psychosomatic Medicine 63: 476–486CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos, A and Mormède, P 1997 Stress and emotionality: a multidimensional and genetic approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 22: 33–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romeyer, A and Bouissou, M 1992 Assessment of fear reactions in domestic sheep, and influence of breed and rearing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Taylor, AA and de Passille, AM 1999 Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 65: 285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spooren, WPJM, Schoeffter, P, Gasparini, F, Kuhn, R and Gentsch, C 2002 Pharmacological and endocrinological characterisation of stress-induced hyperthermia in singly housed mice using classical and candidate anxiolytics (LY314582, MPEP and NKP608). European Journal of Pharmacology 435: 161–170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sundgren-Andersson, AK, Ostlund, P and Bartfai, T 1998 Simultaneous measurement of brain and core temperature in the rat during fever, hyperthermia, hypothermia and sleep. Neuroimmunomodulation 5: 241–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Reenen, CG, O’Connell, NE, Van der Werf, JTN, Korte, SM, Hopster, H, Jones, RB and Blokhuis, HJ 2005 Responses of calves to acute stress: individual consistency and relations between behavioral and physiological measures. Physiology & Behavior 85: 557–570CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenheede, M, Bouissou, MF and Picard, M 1998 Interpretation of behavioural reactions of sheep towards feareliciting situations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 293–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierin, M and Bouissou, MF 2002 Influence of maternal experience on fear reactions in ewes. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75: 307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zethof, TJJ, Van Der Heyden, JAM, Tolboom, JTBM and Olivier, B 1995 Stress-induced hyperthermia as a putative anxiety model. European Journal of Pharmacology 294: 125–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed