Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T15:50:35.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Access to Roughage and Shelter on Selected Behavioural Indicators of Welfare in Pigs Housed in a Complex Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

A W Olsen ,
H B Simonsen  and
L Dybkjær
A W Olsen*
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Research Centre Foulum, P O Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
H B Simonsen
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Animal Science and Health, Grønnegårdsvej 8, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
L Dybkjær
Affiliation:
Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Research Centre Foulum, P O Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Anne.Olsen@agrsci.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of roughage and shelter on certain welfare indicators in growing pigs that have access to ample straw and space. The effects of the two treatments were evaluated both by recording the pigs’ use of the various areas of the pen and by measuring the frequency of two specific behaviours, ‘aggression’ and ‘play’, that are considered to be significant indicators of welfare in pigs. Seven replicates were used, each involving 96 pigs. The pigs were randomly allocated to eight experimental pens at 10 weeks of age, and were observed from 13 to 22 weeks of age. The two treatments, roughage and shelter, were distributed according to a 2 x 2 design in the pigs’ outdoor runs, four of which were located on each side of the barn (north side versus south side). The pigs spent most of their time in the straw-provided areas, and the frequency of their aggressive behaviour was also the highest in these areas, suggesting that these locations were the most attractive to the pigs. The pigs with access to roughage showed a lower frequency of aggression (P < 0.05) and spent more time in the outdoor area where the roughage was placed than those pigs with no access to roughage (P < 0.05). No other effects of treatment were found on the length of time spent in the different pen locations. Play frequency decreased with age (P < 0.05) and with increasing temperature (P < 0.01). Moreover, when housed on the south side of the building, the pigs with access to shelter played more than those without (2.0 versus 1.0 events per hour [SE = 0.3]; P < 0.05); this suggests that the opportunity to regulate the body temperature by use of shade results in improved welfare. In conclusion, the pigs’ behaviour indicated that their welfare was improved by free access to roughage and shelter.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourhousingpigsroughagetemperature
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , February 2002 , pp. 75 - 87
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beattie, V E, Sneddon, I A and Walker, N 1993 Behaviour and productivity of the domestic pig in barren and enriched environments. Proceedings of Livestock Environment IV Conference, Coventry UK, 6-9 July pp 43–50. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, J K, Swain, A J, Blackshaw, A W, Thomas, F J M and Gillies, K J 1997 The development of playful behaviour in piglets from birth to weaning in three farrowing environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøhmer, M and Hoy, S 1993 The influence of the housing system (deep litter system with additives of slatted metallic floor) on the behaviour of fattening pigs. Proceedings of Livestock Environment IV Conference, Coventry UK, 6-9 July pp 483–488. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
BØJ 1994 Bekendtgørelse om økologisk jordbrugsproduktion. Plantedirektoratets Bekendtgørelse nr. 892 af 27 oktober: Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries [Title translation: Regulations for organic farming in Denmark, Executive Order No 982, 27 October]Google Scholar
Bonn, CR 1981 The effect of departures from lower critical temperature on the group postural behaviour of pigs. Animal Production 33: 71–79Google Scholar
Botermans, JAM and Andersson, M 1993 Pen function and thermal comfort in an unisolated stable for growing-finishing pigs. Proceedings of Livestock Environment IV Conference, Coventry UK, 6-9 July pp 851–858. American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St Joseph, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J M 1990 Straw-flow: a high welfare system for pigs. Farm Building Progress 102: 9–13Google Scholar
Buchenauer, D 1981 Parameters for assessing welfare: ethological criteria, ln: Sybesma W (ed) The Welfare of the Pig pp 75–89. A seminar in the EEC programme of coordination for research on animal welfare, 25-26 November, Brussels. Martinus Nijhoff: The Hague, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, N E O and Beattie, V E 1999 Influence of environmental enrichment on aggressive behaviour and dominance relationships in growing pigs. Animal Welfare 8: 269–279Google Scholar
Dobao, M T, Rodrigañez, J and Silio, L 1985 Choice of companions in social play in piglets. Applied Animal Ethology 13: 259–266Google Scholar
Dybkjær, L 1992 The identification of behavioural indicators of ‘stress’ in early weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Phillips, P A, Thompson, B K and Tennessen, T 1991 Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 10: 307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L L, Hagelsø, A M and Madsen, A 1982 Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed “ad libitum” from one or several self feeders. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 307–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Haske-Cornelius, H, Bogner, H and Beschke, W 1979 Untersuchen zum Verhalten von Mastschweinen in vershiedenen Stallsystem unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Schwanz- und Ohrenbeissens. Bayerisches Landwirtschaftliches Jahrbuch 56: 162–200 [Title translation: Investigations on the behaviour of fattening pigs in different housing systems in relation to tail and ear biting]Google Scholar
Ingram, D L 1965 Evaporative cooling in the pig. Nature 207: 415–416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, P 1980 An ethogram of social interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, P 1982 An analysis of agonistic interaction patterns in group-housed dry sows — aggression regulation through an “avoidance order”. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 47–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, E and Pedersen, A R 1998 How to obtain those nasty standard errors from transformed data — and why they should not be used. International Report 7 (20 pp). Biometry Research Unit, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1986 Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
McGlone, J J 1985 A quantitative ethogram of aggressive and submissive behaviours in recently regrouped pigs. Journal of Animal Science 61: 559–565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, J J, Salak, J L, Lumpkin, E A, Nicholson, R I, Gibson, M and Norman, R L 1993 Shipping stress and social status effects on pig performance, plasma Cortisol, natural killer cell activity, and leukocyte numbers. Journal of Animal Science 71: 888–896CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, R and Wood-Gush, D G M 1988 Development of some behaviour patterns in piglets under semi-natural conditions. Animal Production 46: 103–109Google Scholar
Newberry, R C, Wood-Gush, D G M and Hall, J W 1988 Playful behaviour of piglets. Behavioural Processes 17: 205–216CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsen, A W 2001 Behaviour of growing pigs kept in pens with outdoor runs. I. Effect of access to roughage and shelter on oral activities. Livestock Production Science 69: 255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A W, Dybkjær, L and Simonsen, H B 2001 Behaviour of growing pigs kept in pens with outdoor runs. II. Temperature regulatory behaviour, comfort behaviour, and dunging preferences. Livestock Production Science 69: 265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, C A 1993 Behaviour and other indices of welfare in growing/finishing pigs kept on straw-flow, bare-concrete, slats and deep straw. PhD thesis, University of Aberdeen, UKGoogle Scholar
Petersen, V 1994 The development of feeding and investigatory behaviour in free-ranging domestic pigs during their first 18 weeks of life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 87–98Google Scholar
van Putten, G 1980 Objective observations on the behaviour of fattening pigs. Animal Regulation Studies 3’. 105–118Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc 1995 SAS Users Guide, Version 6.11. Cary NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, A L, Salomons, M O, Tong, A K W, Sather, A P and Lepage, P 1990 The effect of environmental enrichment on aggression in newly weaned pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 41–52Google Scholar
Simonsen, H B 1990 Behaviour and distribution of fattening pigs in the multi-activity pen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 311 -324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoolder, HAM, Burbidge, J A, Edwards, A A, Simmins, P H and Lawrence, A B 1995 Provision of straw as foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stookey, J M and Gonyou, H W 1994 The effects of regrouping on behavioural and production parameters in finishing swine. Journal of Animal Science 72: 2804–2811CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worsaae, H and Schmidt, A 1980 Plasma cortical and behaviour in early weaned piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 21: 640–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar