Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:37:17.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effective Feeding Enrichment for Non-Human Primates: A Brief Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

V Reinhardt  and
A Roberts
V Reinhardt*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Institute, PO Box 3650, Washington, DC 20007, USA
A Roberts
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Institute, PO Box 3650, Washington, DC 20007, USA
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: 4605 Crescent Road, Madison WI 53711, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is a growing awareness that non-human primates kept in zoos and laboratories deserve more species-appropriate stimulation because of their biological adaptation to a challenging environment.

Numerous attempts have been made to effectively emulate the gathering and processing aspects of natural feeding. Whole natural food-items, woodchips mixed with seeds, the puzzle ceiling and the puzzle feeder stocked with ordinary biscuits, cost little or nothing but induce sustained food gathering and/or food processing. Turf and fleece substrates sprinkled with particles of flavoured food, foraging trays, probe feeders and puzzles baited with food treats also promote more foraging behaviour, but they are relatively expensive and require added labour time to load and clean them.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural healthenrichmentfeedingforagingnon-human primates
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , August 1997 , pp. 265 - 272
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anderson, J R and Chamove, A S 1984 Allowing captive primates to forage. In: Standards in Laboratory Animal Management pp 253–256. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K, Dexter, S, Mainzer, H, McCulIy, C, Campbell, G and Yamada, F 1992 The use of artificial turf as a foraging substrate for individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Welfare 1: 39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, K, Mainzer, H, Dexter, S, Campbell, G, Yamada, F and Suomi, S 1991 The reduction of abnormal behaviors in individually housed rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with a foraging/grooming board. American Journal of Primatology 23: 23–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beirise, J and Reinhardt, V 1992 Three inexpensive environmental enrichment options for group-housed Macaca mulatta. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 7–8Google Scholar
Bloomsmith, M A, Alford, P L and Maple, T L 1988 Successful feeding enrichment for captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology 16: 155–164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boinski, S, Noon, C, Stans, S, Samudio, R, Sammarco, P and Hayes, A 1994 The behavioral profile and environmental enrichment of a squirrel monkey colony. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 33(4): 1–4Google Scholar
Brent, L and Eichberg, J W 1991 Primate puzzleboard: a simple environmental enrichment device for captive chimpanzees. Zoo Biology 10: 353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, C E, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1988 Effects of different environmental enrichment devices on cage stereotypies and auto aggression in captive cynomolgus monkeys. Journal of Medical Primatology 17: 257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, G D and Suomi, S J 1991 Effects of woodchips and buried food on behavior patterns and psychological well-being of captive rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 23: 141–151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, W 1918 Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts. Biological Bulletin 34: 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combette, C and Anderson, J R 1991 Résponse à deux techniques d'enrichissement environmental chez deux espèces de primates en laboratoire (Cebus apella, Lemur macaco). Cahiers d’Ethologie 11: 1–16Google Scholar
Gilloux, I, Gurnell, J and Shepherdson, D 1992 An enrichment device for great apes. Animal Welfare 1: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S L 1990 Increasing foraging opportunities for a group of captive capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Laboratory Animal Science 40: 515–519Google ScholarPubMed
Hediger, H 1955 Studies of the Psychology and Behaviour of Animals in Zoos and Circuses. Butterworths: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Lam, K, Rupniak, N M J and Iversen, S D 1991 Use of a grooming and foraging substrate to reduce cage stereotypies in macaques. Journal of Medical Primatology 20: 104–109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambeth, S P and Bloomsmith, M A 1994 A grass foraging device for captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Animal Welfare 3: 13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, C K and Farrow, R A 1996 Foraging device for singly housed longtailed macaques does not reduce stereotypies. Contemporary Topics 35(3): 75–78Google Scholar
Meyer-Holzapfel, M 1968 Abnormal behavior in zoo animals. In: Fox, M F (ed) Abnormal Behavior in Animals pp 276–503. Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Murchison, M A 1992 Task-oriented feeding device for singly caged primates. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 31(1): 9–11Google Scholar
Nadler, R D, Herndon, J G, Metz, B, Ferrer, A C and Erwin, J 1992 Environmental enrichment by varied feeding strategies for individually caged young chimpanzees. In: Chimpanzee Conservation and Public Health: Environments for the Future pp 137–145. Diagnon/Bioqual: Rockville, USAGoogle Scholar
Neuringer, A J 1969 Animals respond for food in the presence of free food. Science 166: 399–401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pyle, D A, Bennett, A L, Zarcone, T J, Turkkan, J S, Adams, R J and Hienz, R D 1996 Use of two food foraging devices by singly housed baboons. Laboratory Primate Newsletter 35(2): 10–15Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1993a Enticing non-human primates to forage for their standard biscuit ration. Zoo Biology 12: 307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1993b Promoting increased foraging behavior in caged stumptailed macaques. Folia Primatologica 61: 47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1993c Using the mesh ceiling as a food puzzle to encourage foraging behaviour in caged rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Animal Welfare 2: 165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, V 1994 Caged rhesus macaques voluntarily work for ordinary food. Primates 35: 95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, S J, Suarez, S A, Porter, L M and Bloomsmith, M A 1996 The effects of different types of feeding enhancements on the behaviour of single-caged, yearling rhesus macaques. Animal Welfare 5: 129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, M, Kowalczky, M A, Fortman, J D and Bennett, B T 1994 Design and implementation of a primate foraging tray. Contemporary Topics 33(5): 54–55Google ScholarPubMed