Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T21:57:01.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancing quality of life for dogs and cats in confined situations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

RP Timmins*
Affiliation:
Center for Animals in Society, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
KD Cliff
Affiliation:
Companion Animal Behaviour Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
CT Day
Affiliation:
Small Animal Clinic and Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
BL Hart
Affiliation:
Companion Animal Behaviour Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
LA Hart
Affiliation:
UC Center for Animal Alternatives, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
RC Hubrecht
Affiliation:
Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire AL4 8AN, UK
KF Hurley
Affiliation:
Shelter Medicine Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis CA 95616, USA
CJC Phillips
Affiliation:
Center for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
JS Rand
Affiliation:
Center for Companion Animal Health, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
I Rochlitz
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
JA Serpell
Affiliation:
Center for Interaction of Animals and Society, 3900 Delancey Street, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
SL Zawistowski
Affiliation:
American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 424 E 92nd Street, New York, NY 10218, USA
*
* Correspondence: rptimmins@ucdavis.edu

Abstract

An international panel of experts in the fields of canine and feline health, welfare and behaviour conducted an online discussion addressing two questions: (1) how can one define quality of life (QoL) for dogs and cats in confined living situations, such as laboratories; and (2) what additional research is needed to determine how optimal QoL can be achieved? The panel suggested that QoL encompasses animal welfare and the subjective ‘feelings’ of the animal regarding its life, and that it can only be inferred from behavioural, physiological and other measures. Two methods for measuring QoL were proposed: establishing an ethogram defining QoL for individuals; and developing a ‘quality of living’ scale that can be applied to facilities housing groups of dogs and cats. Constructing these measures requires a comprehensive research program, and the paper discusses overall research objectives, specific questions that must be addressed, and some proposed research methods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamelli, S, Marinelli, L, Normando, S and Bono, G 2005 Owner and cat features influence the quality of life of the cat. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 94: 8998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Pet Products Manufacturers Association Inc 2005 Industry Statistics and Trends. Available at http://www.appma.org/press_industrytrends.asp (accessed 20 Oct 2005)Google Scholar
Bradshaw, JWS and Casey, RA 2007 Anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism as influences in the quality of life of companion animals. Animal Welfare 16(S): 149154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, JP and Silverman, JD 1999 The current and future market for veterinarians and veterinary medical services in the United States. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 215: 161183Google ScholarPubMed
Duncan, IJH and Fraser, D 1997 Understanding animal welfare. In: Appleby, MC and Hughes, BO (eds) Animal Welfare pp 1931. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hewson, C 2003 What is animal welfare? Common definitions and their practical consequences. Canadian Veterinary Journal 44: 496499Google ScholarPubMed
Hubrecht, RC and Buckwell, A 2004 The welfare of laboratory dogs. In: Kaliste, E (ed) The Welfare of Laboratory Animals pp 245274. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagoni, L, Butler, C and Hetts, S 1994 The Human–Animal Bond and Grief. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
McMillan, F 2000 Quality of life in animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 216: 19041910CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, Human Resources Consulting, LLC, 2005 Global Quality of Living Reports. Available at http://mercerhr.com/summary.jhtml?idContent=1173370 (accessed 21 August 2006)Google Scholar
Miller, L and Zawistowski, S (eds) 2004 Shelter Medicine for Veterinarians and Staff. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Prescott, MJ, Morton, DB, Anderson, D, Buckwell, A, Heath, S, Hubrecht, R, Jennings, M, Robb, D, Ruane, B, Swallow, J and Thompson, P 2004 Refining dog husbandry and care: Eighth Report of the BVA(AWF)/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 38(Suppl 1): 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I (ed) 2005 The Welfare of Cats. Springer: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Wiseman-Orr, ML, Nolan, AM, Reid, J and Scott, EM 2004 Development of a questionnaire to measure the effects of chronic pain on health-related quality of life in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 10771084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojciechowska, JI and Hewson, CJ 2005 Quality of life assessment in pet dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 722728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed