Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:23:26.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary starch sources affect net portal appearance of amino acids and glucose in growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2008

T.-J. Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Health and Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agro-ecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, PR China
Q.-Z. Dai
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Health and Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agro-ecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, PR China Hunan Institute of Animal and Veterinary Science, Changsha, Hunan 410131, PR China
Y.-L. Yin*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Health and Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agro-ecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, PR China Key Laboratory of Food Science, Ministry of Education of China, Department of Food Science & Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, PR China
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Health and Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agro-ecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, PR China
R.-L. Huang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Health and Key Laboratory of Subtropical Agro-ecology, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 10, Changsha, Hunan 410125, PR China
Z. Ruan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Food Science, Ministry of Education of China, Department of Food Science & Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, PR China
Z. Deng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Food Science, Ministry of Education of China, Department of Food Science & Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, PR China
M. Xie
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Food Science, Ministry of Education of China, Department of Food Science & Engineering, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330047, PR China
Get access

Abstract

Four male pigs (Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire; average initial (mean ± SEM) BW = 22.5 ± 1.1 kg), fitted with permanent catheters in the portal vein, ileal vein and carotid artery, were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square experimental design to measure the effect of dietary starch sources on the net portal appearance of glucose and amino acids. Dietary starch sources were resistant starch (RS), maize, sticky rice and brown rice. Diets were provided at 0730, 1530 and 2330 h during a 6-day adjustment period and 1-day collection period. On day 7 of each period, blood samples were collected from the portal vein and carotid artery at 0730 h (prior to feeding) and hourly up to 8 h after meal. Blood samples were used to determine glucose, amino acid, packed cell volume and partial pressure of oxygen (pO2). When calculated per 100 g feed intake, cumulative portal glucose appearance was lower (P < 0.05) for resistant starch than for maize, sticky rice or brown rice up to 8 h after the meal. Cumulative portal glucose appearance was higher (P < 0.05) for sticky rice and brown rice than for other diets until 4 h after the meal, but maize had higher cumulative glucose appearance after 4 h. Net cumulative portal concentrations of most amino acids for resistant starch were also reduced (P < 0.05) than for the other starch sources. Cumulative portal appearance of amino acid represented 48.39%, 63.76%, 61.80% and 59.18% of dietary intake for resistant starch, maize, sticky rice and brown rice, respectively. Collectively, our results indicate that dietary starch sources substantially affect the appearance of amino acids and glucose in the portal circulation.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Burrin, DG, Stoll, B, van Groundcover, JB, Reeds, PJ 2000. Nutrient requirements for intestinal growth and metabolism in the developing pig. In Digestive Physiology of pig (ed. JE Lindberg and B Ogle), pp. 7588. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Cant, JP, McBride, BW, JrCroom, WJ 1996. The regulation of intestinal metabolism and its impact on whole animal energetics. Journal of Animal Science 74, 25412553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen L, Yin Y-L, Jobgen WS, Jobgen SC, Knabe DA, Hu W-X, Wu GY 2007. In vitro oxidation of essential amino acids by jejunal mucosal cells of growing pigs. Livestock Science 109, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cone, JW, Vlot, M 1990. Comparison of degradability of starch in concentrates by enzymes and rumen fluid. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 63, 142148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, JH, Englyst, HN 1995. Gastrointestinal effects of food carbohydrate. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61, S938S945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englyst, HN, Hudson, GJ 1996. The classification and measurement of dietary carbohydrates. Food Chemistry 57, 1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, CML, Preto, SJR, Ciacco, CF 1992. Factors that affect the enzyme degradation of natural starch granules-effects of the size of the granules. Starch 44, 422426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, RB, Brothers, AJ 1962. Renal extraction of para-aminohippurate and creatinine measured by continuous in vivo sampling of arterial and renal-vein blood. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 102, 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, RL, Yin, YL, Li, TJ, Gao, JP, Tao, LH 2003. Techniques for implanting a chronic hepatic portal vein transonic flow meter and catheters in the hepatic portal vein, ileal mesenteric vein and carotid artery in swine. Zoonutrimenta Sinica 15 (suppl. 1), 1020.Google Scholar
Leclere, C, Lairon, D, Champ, M, Cherbut, C 1993. Influence of particle size and sources of nonstarch polysaccharides on postprandial glycaemia, insulinaemia and triacylglycerolaemia in pigs and starch digestion in vitro. British Journal of Nutrition 70, 179188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llames, CR, Fontaine, J 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists 77, 13621366.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, J, Bakker, JGM, Smiths, B, Devisser, H 1997. Effect of source of starch on net portal flux of glucose, lactate, volatile fatty acids, and amino acids in the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 78, 533544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC 1998. Nutrients requirements for swine, 10th edition. Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rerat, A 1985. Intestinal absorption of end products from digestion of carbohydrates and proteins in the pig. Archives of Animal Nutrition 35, 461480.Google ScholarPubMed
Rerat, A, Vaissade, P, Vaugelade, P 1984. Absorption kinetics of some carbohydrates in conscious pigs. 2. Quantitative aspects. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 517529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoveller, AK, Stoll, B, Ball, RO, Burrin, DG 2005. Nutritional and functional importance of intestinal sulfur amino acid metabolism. Journal of Nutrition 135, 16091612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, RGD, Torrie, JH 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Stoll, B, Burrin, DG, Yu, H, Henry, J, Jahoor, F, Reeds, PF 1998. Catabolism dominates the first-pass intestinal metabolism of dietary essential amino acids in milk protein-fed piglets. Journal of Nutrition 128, 606614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaugelade, P, Posho, L, Darcy-Vrillon, B, Bernard, F, Morel, MT, Duee, PH 1994. Intestinal oxygen uptake and glucose metabolism during nutrient absorption in the pig. Proceedings of the Society for Experiment Biology and Medicine 207, 309316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weurding, RE, Veklman, A, Veen, WA, van der Aar, PJ, Verstegen, MW 2001. Starch digestion rate in the small intestine of broiler chickens differs among feedstuffs. Journal of Nutrition 131, 23292335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G 1998. Intestinal mucosal amino acid catabolism. Journal of Nutrition 128, 12491252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, JrMorris, SM 1998. Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond. Journal of Biochemistry 336, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Knabe, DA, Flynn, NE, Yan, W, Flynn, SP 1996. Arginine degradation in developing porcine enterocytes. The American Journal of Physiology 271, G913G919.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, G, Knabe, DA, Flynn, NE 2005. Amino acid metabolism in the small intestine: biochemical bases and nutritional significance. In Biology of Metabolism of Growing Animals (ed. DG Burrin and HJ Mersmann), pp. 107126. Elsevier, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, JT, Killefer, J 1987. A method for chronically quantifying net absorption of nutrients and gut metabolites into hepatic portal vein in conscious swine. Journal of Animal Science 64, 923934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, YL, Huang, RL, Zhong, HY, Li, TJ, Souffrant, WB, de Lange, CFM 2002. Evaluation of mobile nylon bag technique for determining apparent ileal digestibilities of protein and amino acids in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 409420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed