Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:01:58.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partially defatted olive cake in finishing pig diets: implications on performance, faecal microbiota, carcass quality, slurry composition and gas emission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

P. Ferrer Open the ORCID record for P. Ferrer [Opens in a new window] ,
S. Calvet ,
P. García-Rebollar ,
C. de Blas ,
A. I. Jiménez-Belenguer ,
P. Hernández ,
O. Piquer  and
A. Cerisuelo
P. Ferrer*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Animal, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera CV-315 Km 10.7, 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Edificio 7G, 46022, Valencia, Spain
S. Calvet
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Edificio 7G, 46022, Valencia, Spain
P. García-Rebollar
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Agraria, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain
C. de Blas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Agraria, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Av. Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain
A. I. Jiménez-Belenguer
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biotecnología, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Edificio 3H, 46022, Valencia, Spain
P. Hernández
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Animal, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, Edificio 7G, 46022, Valencia, Spain
O. Piquer
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción y Sanidad Animal, Salud Pública Veterinaria y Ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, C/Tirant lo Blanc 7, 46115, Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
A. Cerisuelo
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Animal, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Carretera CV-315 Km 10.7, 46113, Moncada, Valencia, Spain
*
†E-mail: ferrer_pabrie@gva.es
Get access

Abstract

One of the key factors to improve swine production sustainability is the use of agro-industrial by-products in feeds, such as olive by-products. However, it is necessary to assess its effects on the overall production process, including the animal and the environment. With this aim, an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of including a partially defatted olive cake (PDOC) in pig diets on growth performance, faecal microbiota, carcass quality and gas emission from the slurry. Two finishing diets were formulated, a control (C) diet and a diet with PDOC included at 120 g/kg. Eighty finishing male pigs Duroc-Danbred × (Landrace × Large White) of 60.4 ± 7.00 kg BW were divided between these two treatments. During the finishing period (60 to 110 kg BW, 55 days) average daily gain, average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio were recorded. Faecal samples from the rectum of 16 animals per treatment were incubated for bacteria enumeration. At the end of finishing period, backfat thickness and loin depth (LD) were measured. Animals were slaughtered to obtain carcass weight and carcass composition parameters, and subcutaneous fat was sampled to analyse the fatty acid (FA) profile. In addition greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions were measured during pig slurry storage using the methodology of dynamic flux chambers. An initial slurry characterisation and biochemical methane potential (B0) were also determined. No significant differences between treatments were found in performance, carcass quality and microbial counts with the exception of LD, which was lower in PDOC compared with C animals (45.5 v. 47.5 mm, SEM: 0.62; P = 0.020). The FA profile of the subcutaneous fat did not differ between treatments, but the monounsaturated FA (MUFA) concentration was higher and the polyunsaturated FA was lower in the animals fed PDOC (50.9 v. 48.3, SEM: 0.48, P < 0.001; 17.6 v. 19.3, SEM: 0.30, P < 0.001 in mg/100 g of Total FA, for PDOC and C animals, respectively). The initial pig slurry characterisation only showed differences in ADF concentration that was higher (P < 0.05) in the slurry from PDOC treatment. Regarding gas emission, slurries from both treatments emitted similar amounts of ammonia (NH3), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), as well as B0 values. The results obtained suggest that PDOC may be included in balanced pig diets at rates of up to 120 g/kg without negative effects on performance, carcass quality, gut microflora and slurry gas emission, while improving the MUFA concentration of subcutaneous fat.

Keywords

olive by-productsswinegrowth performancecarcass traitsgaseous emissions
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , February 2020 , pp. 426 - 434
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abo Omar, JM, Daya, R and Ghaleb, A 2012. Effects of different forms of olive cake on the performance and carcass quality of Awassi lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 171, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alburquerque, J, Gonzálvez, J, García, D and Cegarra, J 2004. Agrochemical characterisation of ‘alperujo’, a solid by-product of the two-phase centrifugation method for olive oil extraction. Bioresource Technology 91, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Public Health Association (APHA) 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 21th edition. APHA, Baltimore, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bach Knudsen, KE and Hansen, I 1991. Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. The British Journal of Nutrition 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beccaccia, A, Calvet, S, Cerisuelo, A, Ferrer, P, García-Rebollar, P and De Blas, C 2015. Effects of nutrition on digestion efficiency and gaseous emissions from slurry in growing-finishing pigs. I. Influence of the inclusion of two levels of orange pulp and carob meal in isofibrous diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 208, 158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, S, Hunt, J and Misselbrook, TH 2017. Low frequency aeration of pig slurry affects slurry characteristics and emissions of greenhouse gases and ammonia. Biosystems Engineering 159, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cámara, L, Berrocoso, JD, Coma, J, López-Bote, CJ and Mateos, GG 2016. Growth performance and carcass quality of crossbreds pigs from two Pietrain sire lines fed isoproteic diets varying in energy concentration. Meat Science 114, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canh, TT, Verstegen, MW, Aarnink, AJ and Schrama, JW 1997. Influence of dietary factors on nitrogen partitioning and composition of urine and feces of fattening pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75, 700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardona, F, Andrés-Lacueva, C, Tulipani, S, Tinahones, FJ and Queipo-Ortuño, MI 2013. Benefits of polyphenols on gut microbiota and implications in human health. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 24, 1415–1422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cava, R, Ruiz, J, López-Bote, C, Martín, L, García, C, Ventanas, J and Antequera, T 1997. Influence of finishing diet on fatty acid profiles of intramuscular lipids, triglycerides and phospholipids in muscles of the Iberian pig. Meat Science 45, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerisuelo, A, Castelló, L, Moset, V, Martínez, M, Hernández, P, Piquer, O, Gómez, E, Gasa, J and Lainez, M 2010. The inclusion of ensiled citrus pulp in diets for growing pigs: effects on voluntary intake, growth performance, gut microbiology and meat quality. Livestock Science 134, 180–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro, S, Viveros, A, Alvarez, I, Vega, I and Brenes, A 2012. Changes in polyphenol and polysaccharide content of grape seed extract and grape pomace after enzymatic treatment. Food Chemistry 133, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Blas, C, García-Rebollar, P and Mateos, GG 2015b. Revsión 3ª edición Tablas FEDNA: Información complementraia. In XXXI Curso Especialización FEDNA: Avances Nutrición y Alimentación Animal. (ed. P García-Rebollar, C de Blas and GG Mateos), pp 67–107. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
De Blas, C, Rodriguez, CA, Bacha, F, Fernandez, R and Abad-Guamán, R 2015a. Nutritive value of co-products derived from olivecake in rabbit feeding. World Rabbit Science 23, 255–262.10.4995/wrs.2015.4036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOSTAT, 2017. Production quantities by country, 2014. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved on 26 June 2018, from http://faostat3.fao.org/home/ Google Scholar
FEDNA 2010. Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos, 3ª edición. (ed. de Blas, C, Mateos, GG, García-Rebollar, P), pp 310–311. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Ferrer, P, Calvet, S, Piquer, O, García-Rebollar, P, de Blas, C, Bonet, J, Coma, J and Cerisuelo, A 2017. Olive cake in pigs feeding: effects on growth performance, carcass quality and gas emission from slurry. In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference of Innovative Animal Nutrition and Feeding, 18–20 October 2017, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 63–64.Google Scholar
Ferrer, P, García-Rebollar, P, Cerisuelo, A, Ibáñez, MA, Rodríguez, CA, Calvet, S and De Blas, C 2018. Nutritional value of crude and partially defatted olive cake in finishing pigs and effects on nitrogen balance and gaseous emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 236, 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-González, DL and Aparicio, R 2010. Research in olive oil: challenges for the near future. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58, 12569–12577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, E, Hernández-Matamoros, A and Tejeda, JF 2012. Two by-products of the olive oil extraction industry as oleic acid supplement source for Iberian pigs: effect on the meat’s chemical composition and induced lipoperoxidation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 92, 2543–2551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
INRA 2004. Tables of composition and nutritional value of feed materials, 2nd edition. INRA editions, Versailles, France.Google Scholar
Jarrett, S and Ashworth, CJ 2018. The role of dietary fibre in pig production, with a particular emphasis on reproduction. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 9, 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joven, M, Pintos, E, Latorre, MA, Suárez-Belloch, J, Guada, JA and Fondevila, M 2014. Effect of replacing barley by increasing levels of olive cake in the diet of finishing pigs: growth performances, digestibility, carcass, meat and fat quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leouifoudi, I, Harnafi, H and Zyad, A 2015. Olive mill waste extracts: polyphenols content, antioxidant, and antimicrobial activities. Advances in Pharmacological Sciences 2015, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licitra, G, Hernández, TM and Van Soest, PJ 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marín, L, Miguélez, EM, Villar, CJ and Lombó, F 2015. Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: antimicrobial properties. BioMed Research International 2015, 905215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas, G, Llavall, M, Coll, D, Roca, R, Diaz, I, Gispert, M, Oliver, MA and Realini, CE 2010. Carcass and meat quality characteristics and fatty acid composition of tissues from Pietrain-crossed barrows and gilts fed an elevated monounsaturated fat diet. Meat Science 85, 707–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molina-Alcaide, E and Yáñez-Ruiz, DR 2008. Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morazán, H, Alvarez-Rodriguez, J, Seradj, AR, Balcells, J and Babot, D 2015. Trade-offs among growth performance, nutrient digestion and carcass traits when feeding low protein and/or high neutral-detergent fiber diets to growing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207, 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Fallon, JV, Busboom, JR, Nelson, ML and Gaskins, CT 2007. A direct method for fatty acid methyl ester synthesis: application to wet meat tissues, oils, and feedstuffs. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1511–1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pieper, R, Vahjen, W and Zentek, J 2015. Dietary fibre and crude protein: impact on gastrointestinal microbial fermentation characteristics and host response. Animal Production Science 55, 1367–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenvold, K and Andersen, HJ 2003. Factors of significance for pork quality – a review. Meat Science 64, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serra, A, Conte, G, Giovannetti, M, Casarosa, L, Agnolucci, M, Ciucci, F, Palla, M, Bulleri, E, Cappucci, A, Servili, M and Mele, M 2018. Olive pomace in diet limits lipid peroxidation of sausages from Cinta Senese swine. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 120, 1700236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Pitarch, A, Moset, V, Ferrer, P, Cambra-López, M, Hernández, P, Coma, J, Pascual, M, Serrano, P and Cerisuelo, A 2014. The inclusion of rapeseed meal in fattening pig diets, as a partial replacer of soybean meal, alters nutrient digestion, faecal composition and biochemical methane potential from faeces. Animal Feed Science and Technology 198, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yemm, EW and Willis, AJ 1954. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. The Biochemical journal 57, 508–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhao, PY, Wang, JP and Kim, IH 2013. Evaluation of dietary fructan supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, fecal microbial flora, and fecal noxious gas emission in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5280–5286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed