Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:25:02.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pasture dry matter intake per cow in intensive dairy production systems: effects of grazing and feeding management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2019

M. N. Méndez Open the ORCID record for M. N. Méndez [Opens in a new window] ,
P. Chilibroste Open the ORCID record for P. Chilibroste [Opens in a new window]  and
M. Aguerre
M. N. Méndez*
Affiliation:
Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería, Avenida 19 de Abril 3482, CP 11700 Montevideo, Uruguay
P. Chilibroste
Affiliation:
Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, EEMAC, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, CP 60000 Paysandú, Uruguay
M. Aguerre
Affiliation:
Red Tecnológica Sectorial de Lechería, Avenida 19 de Abril 3482, CP 11700 Montevideo, Uruguay
*
†E-mail: noemp21@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The competitiveness and sustainability of low input cost dairy production systems are generally supported by efficient use of pasture in the diets. Therefore, pasture intake directly affects overall efficiency of these systems. We aimed to assess feeding and grazing management main factors that affect pasture dry matter intake (DMI) in commercial dairy farms during the different seasons of the year. Fortnightly visits to 28 commercial dairies were carried out between June 2016 and May 2017 to record production and price, supplement offered and price, pasture access time (PAT), herbage mass (HM) and allowance (HA). Only farms with the most contrasting estimated pasture DMI per cow (eDMI) were compared as systems with high (HPI; N = 8) or low (LPI; N = 8) pasture DMI. Despite a lower individual milk production in HPI than LPI (19.0 v. 23.3 ± 0.7 l/cow, P < 0.01), daily margin over feeding cost was not different between groups (3.07 v. 2.93 ± 0.15 U$S/cow for HPI and LPI, respectively). During autumn and winter, HPI cows ingested more pasture than LPI cows (8.3 v. 4.6 and 5.9 v. 2.9 ± 0.55 kg DM/cow per day, respectively, P < 0.01) although PAT, HM and HA were similar between groups. Both groups offered high supplementation levels during these seasons, even though greater in LPI than HPI (14.7 v. 9.7 ± 0.7 kg DM supplement/cow per day, respectively, P < 0.01). On the other hand, differences between groups for both pasture and supplement DMI were more contrasting during spring and summer (13.1 v. 7.3 ± 0.5 and 4.0 v. 11.4 ± 0.4 kg DM/cow per day for HPI and LPI, respectively, P < 0.01), with higher PAT in both seasons (P < 0.05) and higher HA during summer in HPI than LPI (P < 0.01). Unlike LPI, during these seasons HPI adjusted offered supplement according to HA, achieving a higher pasture eDMI and making more efficient use of available pastoral resource than LPI. As there was no grazing limiting condition for pasture harvesting in either group, the main factor affecting pasture DMI was a pasture by supplement substitution effect. These results reinforce the importance of an efficient grazing management, and using supplements to nutritionally complement pasture intake rather than as a direct way to increase milk production.

Keywords

pasture-basedforage consumptionsupplementationsubstitutioncommercial dairy systems
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , April 2020 , pp. 846 - 853
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, MS 2014. Drives and limits to feed intake in ruminants. Animal Production Science 54, 1513–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1997. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition, 3rd revision. AOAC INTERNATIONAL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Bargo, F, Muller, LD, Delahoy, JE and Cassidy, TW 2002. Milk response to concentrate supplementation of high producing dairy cows grazing at two pasture allowances. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1777–1792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baudracco, J, Lopez-Villalobos, N, Holmes, CW and Macdonald, KA 2010. Effects of stocking rate, supplementation, genotype and their interactions on grazing dairy systems: a review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P, Gibb, MJ, Soca, P and Mattiauda, DA 2015. Behavioural adaptation of grazing dairy cows to changes in feeding management: do they follow a predictable pattern? Animal Production Science 55, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P, Soca, P, Mattiauda, DA, Bentancur, O and Robinson, PH 2007. Short term fasting as a tool to design effective grazing strategies for lactating dairy cattle: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 1075–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilibroste, P, Tamminga, S, Boer, H, Gibb, MJ and den Dikken, G 2000. Duration of regrowth of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) effects on grazing behaviour, intake, rumen fill, and fermentation of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 984–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) 1990. Feeding standards for Australian livestock: ruminants. CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Roche, JR, Shalloo, L and Horan, B 2005. Optimising financial return from grazing in temperate pastures. Paper presented at the nature of the Proceedings of a Satellite Workshop of the XXth International Grassland Congress, July 2005, Cork, Ireland, pp. 131–148.Google Scholar
Dixon, RM and Stockdale, CR 1999. Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50, 757–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elizalde, JC, Merchen, NR and Faulkner, DB 1999. Supplemental cracked corn for steers fed fresh alfalfa: I. Effects on digestion of organic matter, fibre, and starch. Journal of Animal Science 77, 457–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fariña, SR and Chilibroste, P 2019. Opportunities and challenges for growth of milk production from pasture based systems: the case of farm systems in Uruguay. Agricultural Systems 176, 102631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaneli, RS, Sollenberger, LE, Littell, RC and Staples, CR 2005. Performance of lactating dairy cows managed on pasture-based or in freestall barn-feeding systems. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1264–1276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulkerson, WJ and Donaghy, DJ 2001. Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence - key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, MJ, Huckle, CA, Nuthall, R and Rook, AJ 1999. The effect of physiological state (lactating or dry) and sward surface height on grazing behaviour and intake by dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 63, 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorini, P, Soder, KJ and Kensinger, RS 2009. Effects of rumen fill on short-term ingestive behaviour and circulating concentrations of ghrelin, insulin, and glucose of dairy cows foraging vegetative micro-swards. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2095–2105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haydock, KP and Shaw, NH 1975. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 15, 663–670.Google Scholar
Holmes, CW, Brookes, IM, Garrick, DJ, Mackenzie, DDS, Parkinson, TJ and Wilson, GF 2002. Feeding the herd: management of feed demand in the pastoral dairy farm system. In Milk Production from Pasture (ed. Swain, D), pp. 33–68. Massey University, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria 2018. Unidad de Agro-clima y Sistemas de información. Síntesis de la situación agroclimática. Retrieved on 5th January 2019, from http://www.inia.uy/gras/Clima/informes-agroclim%C3%A1ticosGoogle Scholar
Kolver, ES and Muller, LD 1998. Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1403–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laca, EA, Ungar, ED, Seligman, N and Demment, MW 1992. Effects of sward height and bulk density on bite dimensions of cattle grazing homogeneous swards. Grass Forage Science 47, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leddin, CMA, Stockdale, CRA, Hill, JB, Heard, JWA and Doyle, PTA 2010. Increasing amounts of crushed wheat fed with Persian clover herbage reduced ruminal pH and dietary fibre digestibility in lactating dairy cows. Animal Production Science 50, 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, M, O’Donovan, M, Kennedy, E, Murphy, JP, Delaby, L and Boland, TM 2009. Effect of pregrazing herbage mass and pasture allowance on the lactation performance of Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 414–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezzalira, JC, De Faccio Carvalho, PC, Fonseca, L, Bremm, C, Cangiano, C, Gonda, HL and Laca, EA 2014. Behavioural mechanisms of intake rate by heifers grazing swards of contrasting structures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 153, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Penno, JW, Macdonald, KA, Holmes, CW, Davis, SR, Wilson, GF, Brookes, IM and Thom, ER 2006. Responses to supplementation by dairy cows given low pasture allowances in different seasons 1. Pasture intake and substitution. Animal Science 82, 661–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Comeron, EA, Wade, MH and Lemaire, G 1996. The effect of daily herbage allowance, herbage mass and animal factors upon herbage intake by grazing dairy cows. Annales de Zootechnie INRA/EDP Sciences 45, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, RB and Combs, DK 2000. Effects of increasing levels of grain supplementation on rumen environment and lactation performance of dairy cows grazing grass-legume pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2888–2898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheahan, AJ, Kay, JK and Roche, JR 2013. Carbohydrate supplements and their effects on pasture dry matter intake, feeding behaviour, and blood factors associated with intake regulation. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stakelum, G and Dillon, P 2007. The effect of grazing pressure on rotationally grazed pastures in spring/early summer on subsequent sward characteristics. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 46, 15–28.Google Scholar
Stockdale, CR 2000. Levels of pasture substitution when concentrates are fed to grazing dairy cows in northern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 913–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edition. Cornell University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Walker, GP, Stockdale, CR, Wales, WJ, Doyle, PT and Dellow, DW 2001. Effect of level of grain supplementation on milk production responses of dairy cows in mid–late lactation when grazing irrigated pastures high in paspalum (Paspalum dilatatum Poir.). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SL, Benson, GA, Washburn, SP and Green, JT 2002. Milk production and economic measures in confinement or pasture systems using seasonally calved Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wims, CM, Deighton, MH, Lewis, E, Loughlin, BO, Delaby, L, Boland, TM and Donovan, MO 2010. Effect of pregrazing herbage mass on methane production, dry matter intake, and milk production of grazing dairy cows during the mid-season period 1. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4976–4985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Méndez et al. supplementary material

Méndez et al. supplementary material

Download Méndez et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.6 KB