Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T18:20:40.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pelleting and extrusion can ameliorate negative effects of toasting of rapeseed meal on protein digestibility in growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2017

S. Salazar-Villanea ,
E. M. A. M. Bruininx ,
H. Gruppen ,
W. H. Hendriks ,
P. Carré ,
A. Quinsac  and
A. F. B. van der Poel
S. Salazar-Villanea*
Affiliation:
Wageningen Livestock Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
E. M. A. M. Bruininx
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Agrifirm Innovation Center, Royal Dutch Agrifirm Group, PO Box 20018, 7302 HA Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
H. Gruppen
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Food Chemistry, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 17, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. H. Hendriks
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
P. Carré
Affiliation:
CREOL/OLEAD, 33600 Pessac, France
A. Quinsac
Affiliation:
Terres Inovia, 33600 Pessac, France
A. F. B. van der Poel
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen University & Research, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: sergio.salazarvillanea@ucr.ac.cr
Get access

Abstract

Toasting time (TT) of rapeseed meal (RSM), the diet processing (DP) method and the interaction between both on the apparent CP digestion along the gastrointestinal tract and the apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of amino acids of growing pigs were investigated. The experiment consisted of a 3×3 factorial design of TT of RSM (0, 60 and 120 min) and DP method (mash, pelleting and extrusion). In total, 81 boars with a starting BW of 20 kg were euthanized 4 h after their last feeding. The gastrointestinal tract was dissected and the small intestine divided in three sections of similar length. Samples were collected from the stomach, 1.5 m from the ends of each of the three sections of the small intestine, and the rectum. The apparent digestibility (AD) of CP for each of the small intestine sections was used to calculate the rate of CP digestion. Increasing the TT of RSM resulted in lower protein solubility, lower lysine/reactive lysine contents and higher protein denaturation, indicative of the occurrence of protein aggregation and Maillard reactions. There were significant effects (P⩽0.01) of TT on the AD of CP in the different sections of the gastrointestinal tract. The rate of CP digestion of the 0 min toasted RSM diets was 23% and 35% higher than that of the 60 and 120 min toasted RSM diets, respectively. There was a significant interaction (P=0.04) between TT and DP for the AID of CP. Although pelleting of the 0 and 60 min toasted RSM diets did not change the AID of CP with respect to the mash diets, pelleting of the 120 min toasted RSM diet increased the AID of CP by 9.3% units. Extrusion increased the AID of CP of the 0 and 60 min toasted RSM diets by 3.4% and 4.3% units with respect to the mash diets, whereas extrusion of the 120 min toasted RSM diet increased the AID of CP by 6.9% units. Similar positive effects of pelleting and extrusion were obtained for the AID of lysine and reactive lysine, especially in the diets with higher TT. In conclusion, processing (pelleting and extrusion) of RSM containing diets can ameliorate the negative effects of RSM toasting on protein and amino acid digestibility; these effects were larger for the RSM toasted for longer times.

Keywords

digestibilityextrusiongrowing pigspelletingrapeseed meal
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 5 , May 2018 , pp. 950 - 958
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

a

Present address: Escuela de Zootecnia, Universidad de Costa Rica (Montes de Oca, San José), Costa Rica.

References

Almeida, FN, Htoo, JK, Thomson, J and Stein, HH 2014. Effects of heat treatment on the apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in canola meal fed to growing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 187, 44–52.Google Scholar
Asche, GL, Lewis, AJ and Peo, ER Jr 1989. Protein digestion in weanling pigs: effect of feeding regimen and endogenous protein secretion. Journal of Nutrition 119, 1083–1092.Google Scholar
Batal, AB, Douglas, MW, Engram, AE and Parsons, CM 2000. Protein dispersibility index as an indicator of adequately processed soybean meal. Poultry Science 79, 1592–1596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, ES 1992. Availability and utilization of amino acids for growing pigs. Nutrition Research Reviews 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoederbureau 2011. Chemical compositions and nutritional values of feed ingredients. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
De Vries, S, Pustjens, AM, Kabel, MA, Salazar-Villanea, S, Hendriks, WH and Gerrits, WJJ 2013. Processing technologies and cell wall degrading enzymes to improve nutritional value of dried distillers grain with solubles for animal feed: an in vitro digestion study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 61, 8821–8828.Google Scholar
Eklund, M, Sauer, N, Schöne, F, Messerschmidt, U, Rosenfelder, P, Htoo, JK and Mosenthin, R 2015. Effect of processing of rapeseed under defined conditions in a pilot plant on chemical composition and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in rapeseed meal for pigs. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2813–2825.Google Scholar
Fang, Y, Zhang, B, Wei, Y and Li, S 2013. Effects of specific mechanical energy on soy protein aggregation during extrusion process studied by size exclusion chromatography coupled with multi-angle laser light scattering. Journal of Food Engineering 115, 220–225.Google Scholar
Fastinger, ND and Mahan, DC 2003. Effect of soybean meal particle size on amino acid and energy digestibility in grower-finisher swine. Journal of Animal Science 81, 697–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenwick, GR, Spinks, EA, Wilkinson, AP, Heaney, RK and Legoy, MA 1986. Effect of processing on the antinutrient content of rapeseed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 735–741.Google Scholar
Friedman, M, Zahnley, JC and Masters, PM 1981. Relationship between in vitro digestibility of casein and its content of lysinoalanine and D-amino acids. Journal of Food Science 46, 127–134.Google Scholar
Gerrard, JA, Lasse, M, Cottam, J, Healy, JP, Fayle, SE, Rasiah, I, Brown, PK, BinYasir, SM, Sutton, KH and Larsen, NG 2012. Aspects of physical and chemical alterations to proteins during food processing – some implications for nutrition. British Journal of Nutrition 108 (suppl. 2), S288–S297.Google Scholar
Green, GM and Miyasaka, K 1983. Rat pancreatic response to intestinal infusion of intact and hydrolyzed protein. American Journal of Physiology 245, G394–G398.Google ScholarPubMed
Hulshof, TG, Bikker, P, van der Poel, AFB and Hendriks, WH 2016a. Assessment of protein quality of soybean meal and 00-rapeseed meal toasted in the presence of lignosulfonate by amino acid digestibility in growing pigs and Maillard reaction products. Journal of Animal Science 94, 1020–1030.Google Scholar
Hulshof, TG, van der Poel, AFB, Hendriks, WH and Bikker, P 2016b. Processing of soybean meal and 00-rapeseed meal reduces protein digestibility and pig growth performance but does not affect nitrogen solubilization along the small intestine. Journal of Animal Science 94, 2403–2414.Google Scholar
Ihse, I and Lilja, P 1979. Effects of intestinal amylase and trypsin on pancreatic secretion in the pig. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 14, 1009–1013.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 1999a. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 1999b. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of fat content. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 2000. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of crude fibre content – method with intermediate filtration. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 2002. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of crude ash. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 2005a. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Part 1: Kjeldahl method. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization (ISO) 2005b. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of amino acids content. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization 2016. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of tryptophan content. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jansman, AJM, Smink, W, Van Leeuwen, P and Rademacher, M 2002. Evaluation through literature data of the amount and amino acid composition of basal endogenous crude protein at the terminal ileum of pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 98, 49–60.Google Scholar
Jensen, SK, Liu, YG and Eggum, BO 1995. The effect of heat treatment on glucosinolates and nutritional value of rapeseed meal in rats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 53, 17–28.Google Scholar
Lahaye, L, Ganier, P, Thibault, JN, Riou, Y and Sève, B 2008. Impact of wheat grinding and pelleting in a wheat–rapeseed meal diet on amino acid ileal digestibility and endogenous losses in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 287–305.Google Scholar
Lahaye, L, Ganier, P, Thibault, J-N and Sève, B 2004. Technological processes of feed manufacturing affect protein endogenous losses and amino acid availability for body protein deposition in pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 113, 141–156.Google Scholar
Lahaye, L, Riou, Y and Sève, B 2007. The effect of grinding and pelleting of wheat and maize on amino acids true ileal digestibility and endogenous losses in growing pigs. Livestock Science 109, 138–140.Google Scholar
Lamport, DTA 1967. Hydroxyproline-O-glycosidic linkage of the plant cell wall glycoprotein extensin. Nature 216, 1322–1324.Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Song, M, Maison, T and Stein, HH 2014. Effects of protein concentration and heat treatment on concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy and on amino acid digestibility in four sources of canola meal fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 92, 4466–4477.Google Scholar
Meade, SJ, Reid, EA and Gerrard, JA 2005. The impact of processing on the nutritional quality of food proteins. Journal of AOAC International 88, 904–922.Google Scholar
Morgan, NK, Scholey, DV and Burton, EJ 2014. A comparison of two methods for determining titanium dioxide marker content in broiler digestibility studies. Animal 8, 529–533.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ, Gall, MPJ and Rutherfurd, SM 1996. Absorption of lysine and deoxyketosyllysine in an early-Maillard browned casein by the growing pig. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 1520–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moughan, PJ and Rutherfurd, SM 1996. A new method for determining digestible reactive lysine in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 2202–2209.Google Scholar
Newkirk, RW, Classen, HL, Scott, TA and Edney, MJ 2003. The digestibility and content of amino acids in toasted and non-toasted canola meals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83, 131–139.Google Scholar
Rojas, OJ, Vinyeta, E and Stein, HH 2016. Effects of pelleting, extrusion, or extrusion and pelleting on energy and nutrient digestibility in diets containing different levels of fiber and fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 94, 1951–1960.Google Scholar
Salazar-Villanea, S, Bruininx, EMAM, Gruppen, H, Hendriks, WH, Carré, P, Quinsac, A and Van Der Poel, AFB 2016. Physical and chemical changes of rapeseed meal proteins during toasting and their effects on in vitro digestibility. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 7, 62.Google Scholar
Tripathi, MK and Mishra, AS 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 132, 1–27.Google Scholar
Vande Ginste, J and De Schrijver, R 1998. Expansion and pelleting of starter, grower and finisher diets for pigs: effects on nitrogen retention, ileal and total tract digestibility of protein, phosphorus and calcium and in vitro protein quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72, 303–314.Google Scholar
Wang, W, Nema, S and Teagarden, D 2010. Protein aggregation – pathways and influencing factors. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 390, 89–99.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Salazar-Villanea et al supplementary material

Table S1

Download Salazar-Villanea et al supplementary material(File)
File 21.7 KB