Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:49:14.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in population characteristics and structure of the signal crayfish at the edge of its invasive range in a European river

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2012

Sandra Hudina ,
Karlo Hock ,
Krešimir Žganec  and
Andreja Lucić
Sandra Hudina*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Karlo Hock
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Krešimir Žganec
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Andreja Lucić
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
*Corresponding author: shudina@zg.biol.pmf.hr
Get access

Abstract

The ability of rapid range expansion is one of the key determinants of invasive species success. In order to investigate potential drivers behind the rapid spread of invasive species, we explored changes in population characteristics and structure along the invasion pathway of a successful invader in European freshwaters, the signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus). Diverse population parameters such as relative population abundance, size and sex structure, differences in morphometry and frequency of injuries were compared between signal crayfish population samples at three uniformly distributed segments (approximately 40 km apart) in the lower section of the Mura River, which differed in time since invasion. Examined signal crayfish populations exhibited notable differences, with more recently established populations toward invasion front characterized by lower abundance and male-biased sex ratios, which highlighted males as initial dispersers. We also recorded significant increase in the relative claw size, a competitively advantageous and allometric trait for males, in more recently established populations away from source population. The recorded differences in population structure and male morphometry along the invasion pathway could lead to important clues about dynamics of range expansion and population establishment, highlighting the traits that promote dispersal and better response to local conditions in new habitats. Established differences can also provide insights into the development of targeted management responses aimed at invasive species control.

Keywords

Invasive speciesrange expansiontime since establishmentpopulation characteristicscrayfish
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , 2012 , pp. 3 - 11
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, F. and Breithaupt, T., 2010. To signal or not to signal? Chemical communication by urine-borne signals mirrors sexual conflict in crayfish. BMC Biol., 8, 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bøhn, T., Sandlund, O.T., Amundsen, P. and Primicerio, R., 2004. Rapidly changing life history during invasion. Oikos, 106, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, O.J., Phillips, B.L. and Travis, J.M.J., 2010. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. Ecol. Lett., 13, 1210–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J.F., Cote, J., Meylan, S. and Massot, M., 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett., 12, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cote, J., Clobert, J., Brodin, T., Fogarty, S. and Sih, A., 2010a. Personality dependent dispersal: characterization, ontogeny and consequences for spatially structured populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 365, 4065–4076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cote, J., Weinersmith, K., Brodin, T. and Sih, A., 2010b. Personality traits and dispersal tendency in the invasive mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Proc. R. Soc. B., 277, 1571–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, L., Yeomans, W.E. and Adams, C.E., 2006. The impact of introduced signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus on stream invertebrate communities. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 16, 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromarty, S.I. and Kass-Simon, G., 1998. Differential effects of a molting hormone, 20-hydroxyecdysone, on the neuromuscular junctions of the claw opener and abdominal flexor muscles of the American lobster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A, 120, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, E.D., López-Santiago, J., García-de-Lomas, J., Garcia-Ocaña, D.M., Gámez, V. and Ortega, F., 2010. Long-term management of the invasive Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana, 1852) in a small mountain stream. Aquat. Invasions, 5, 317–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. and Huber, R., 2007. Activity patterns, behavioural repertoires, and agonistic interactions of crayfish: A non-manipulative field study. Behaviour, 144, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debuse, V.J., Addison, J.T. and Reynolds, J.D., 2001. Morphometric variability in UK populations of the European lobster. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc., 81, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diéguez-Uribeondo, J., 2006. The dispersion of the Aphanomyces astaci-carrier Pacifastacus leniusculus by humans represents the main cause of disappearance of the indigenous crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes in Navarra. Bull. Fr. Peche Piscic., 380–381, 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, N.J., Urgelles, R. and Trexler, J.C., 2005. Evaluating active and passive sampling methods to quantify crayfish density in a freshwater wetland. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 24, 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ďuriš, Z., Drozd, P., Horká, I., Kozák, P. and Policar, T., 2006. Biometry and demography of the invasive crayfish Orconectes limosus in the Czech Republic. Bull. Fr. Peche. Piscic., 380–381, 1215–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fero, K. and Moore, P.A., 2008. Social spacing of crayfish in natural habitats: what role does dominance play? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62, 1119–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fero, K., Simon, J., Jourdie, V. and Moore, P.A., 2007. Consequences of social dominance on crayfish resource use. Behaviour, 144, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figiel, C.R. and Miller, G.R., 1995. The frequency of chela autotomy and its influence on the growth and survival of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii (Girard, 1852) (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana, 68, 472–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, J.E. and Stein, R.A., 1993. Evaluating how chela size influences the invasion potential of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus). Am. Midl. Nat., 129, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, F. and Cioni, A., 2004. Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. Behaviour, 141, 1297–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Globevnik, L. and Kaligarič, M., 2005. Hydrological changes of the Mura River in Slovenia accompanied with habitat deteoration in the riverine space. Mater. Geoenviron., 52, 45–49.Google Scholar
Griffiths, S.W., Collen, P. and Armstrong, J.D., 2004. Competition for shelter among over-wintering signal crayfish and juvenile Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol., 65, 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guan, R. and Wiles, P.R., 1999. Growth and reproduction of the introduced crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus in a British lowland river. Fish. Res., 42, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutowsky, L.F.G. and Fox, M.G., 2011. Occupation, body size and sex ratio of round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in established and newly invaded areas in an Ontario river. Hydrobiologia, 671, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harioglu, M.M. and Holdich, D.M., 2001. Meat yields in the introduced freshwater crayish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana) and Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, from British waters. Aquac. Res., 32, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogger, J.B., 1988. Ecology, population biology and behaviour. In: Holdich, D.M. and Lowery, R.S. (eds.), Freshwater crayfish: biology, management and exploitation, The University Press, Cambridge, 114–144.Google Scholar
Holdich, D.M., Reynolds, J.D., Souty-Grosset, C. and Sibley, P.J., 2009. A review of the ever increasing threat to European crayfish from non-indigenous crayfish species. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudina, S., Faller, M., Lucić, A., Klobučar, G. and Maguire, I., 2009. Distribution and dispersal of two invasive crayfish species in the Drava River basin, Croatia. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudina, S., Galic, N., Roessink, I. and Hock, K., 2011. Competitive interactions between co-occurring invaders: identifying asymmetries between two invasive crayfish species. Biol. Invasions, 13, 1791–1803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelić, M., 2009. Distribution of otter (Lutra lutra L.) in the continental part of Croatia. Report for State Institute for Nature Protection, Zagreb, Croatia, 112 p.
Kolar, C.S. and Loge, D.M., 2002. Predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science, 298, 1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laufer, H. and Ahl, J.S.B., 1995. Mating behavior and methyl farnesoate levels in male morphotypes of the spider crab, Libinia emarginata (Leach). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 193, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.Y., 1995. Cheliped size and structure: the evolution of a multifunctional decapod organ. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 193, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, J.L., Hoopes, M.F. and Marchetti, M.P., 2007. Ecological processes and the spread of non-native species. In: Lockwood, J.L., Hoopes, M.F. and Marchetti, M.P. (eds.), Invasion ecology, Blackwell Publishing, USA, 158–184.Google Scholar
Maguire, I., Hudina, S. and Erben, R., 2004. Estimation of noble crayfish (Astacus astacus) population size in the Velika Paklenica Stream (Croatia). Bull. Fr. Peche. Piscic., 372–373, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, M.P., Moyle, P.B. and Levine, R., 2004. Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol. Appl., 14, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrakovčić, M., Mustafić, P., Ćaleta, M., Zanella, D., Buj, I. and Marčić, Z., 2008. Ichtiological biodiversity of the Mura River. University of Zagreb, Croatia, 125 p.
Parker, G., 1974. Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J. Theor. Biol., 47, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, B.L., 2009. The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge. Biol. Lett., 5, 802–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, B.L., Brown, G.P. and Shine, R., 2010. Life-history evolution in range-shifting populations. Ecology, 91, 1617–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pintor, L.M., Sih, A. and Bauer, M., 2008. Differences in aggression, activity and boldness between native introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Oikos, 117, 1629–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintor, L., Sih, A. and Kerby, J., 2009. Behavioral correlations provide a mechanism for explaining high invasive densities and increased impact on native prey. Ecology, 90, 581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöckl, M., 1999. Distribution of crayfish species in Austria with special reference to introduced species. Freshw. Crayfish, 12, 733–750.Google Scholar
Pyšek, P. and Richardson, D.M., 2010. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and ecosystem health. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 35, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramalho, R.O., Correia, A.M. and Anastacio, P.M., 2008. Effects of density on growth and survival of juvenile Red Swamp Crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Girard), reared under laboratory conditions. Aquac. Res., 39, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehage, J.S. and Sih, A., 2004. Dispersal behavior, boldness, and the link to invasiveness: a comparison of four Gambusia species. Biol. Invasions, 6, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricciardi, A., 2001. Facilitative interactions among aquatic invaders: is an “invasional meltdown” occurring in the Great Lakes? Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 58, 2513–2525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rypien, R.L. and Palmer, A.R., 2007. The effect of sex, size and habitat on the incidence of puncture wounds in the claws oft he porcelain crab Petrolisthes cinctipes (Anomura: Porcellanidae). J. Crustac. Biol., 27, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S., Armesto, J.J., Berlow, J., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L.F., Jackson, R.B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D.M., Mooney, H.A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N.L., Sykes, M.T., Walker, B.H., Walker, M., Wall, D.H., 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287, 1770–1774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallai, Z., 2002. Investigation of the fish fauna of the Drava-Mura River System. Halászat, 95, 80–91.Google Scholar
Savolainen, R., Ruohonen, K., Railo, E., 2004. Effect of stocking density on growth, survival and cheliped injuries of stage 2 juvenile signal crayfish Pasifastacus leniusculus Dana. Aquac. Res., 231, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, L. and Huber, R., 2001. Fighting strategies in small and large individuals of the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour, 128, 1437–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sint, D., Dalla Via, J. and Füreder, L., 2007. Phenotypical characterization of indigenous freshwater crayfish populations. J. Zool., 273, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skurdal, J., Taugbøl, T., Fjeld, E. and Qvenild, T., 1988. Cheliped loss in Astacus astacus. Freshwat. Crayfish, 7, 165–170.Google Scholar
Söderbäck, B., 1991. Interspecific dominance relationship and aggressive interactions in the freshwater crayfishes Astacus astacus (L.) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana). Can. J. Zool., 69, 1321–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderbäck, B., 1995. Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a Swedish lake: possible causes and mechanisms. Freshwat. Biol., 33, 291–304.Google Scholar
Sommerwerk, N., Hein, T., Schneider-Jacoby, M., Baumgartner, C., Ostojić, A., Paunović, M., Bloesch, J., Siber, R. and Tockner, K., 2009. The Danube River Basin. In: Tockner, K., Robinson, C.T. and Uehlinger, U. (eds.), Rivers of Europe, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souty-Grosset, C., Holdich, D., Noel, P., Reynolds, J.D. and Haffner, P., 2006. Atlas of crayfish in Europe, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 187 p.Google Scholar
Stancliffe-Vaughan, A., 2009. Non-native crayfish – a community research and trapping initiative on the River Lark, Suffolk. Crayfish News: IAA Newsletter, 31, 5–7.Google Scholar
Strayer, D.L., 2010. Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshwat. Biol., 55, 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streissl, F. and Hödl, W., 2002. Growth, morphometrics, size at maturity, sexual dimorphism and condition index of Austropotamobius torrentium Schrank. Hydrobiologia, 477, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usio, N., Konishi, M. and Nakano, S., 2001. Species displacement between an introduced and a ‘vulnerable’ crayfish: the role of aggressive interactions and shelter competition. Biol. Invasions, 3, 179–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorburger, C. and Ribi, G., 1999. Aggression and competition for shelter between a native and an introduced crayfish in Europe. Freshwat. Biol., 42, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinländer, M. and Füreder, L., 2009. The continuing spread of Pacifastacus leniusculus in Carinthia (Austria). Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst., 394–395, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, K. and Savolainen, R., 2002. Growth of the signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, in a small forest lake in Finland. Boreal. Environ. Res., 7, 53–61.Google Scholar
Westman, K., Pursiainen, M. and Vilkman, R., 1978. A new folding trap model which prevents crayfish from escaping. Freshwat. Crayfish, 4, 235–242.Google Scholar
Westman, K., Savolainen, R. and Pursiainen, M., 1999. Development of the introduced North American signal crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana), population in a small Finnish forest lake in 1970–1977. Boreal. Environ. Res., 4, 387–407.Google Scholar
Zar, J., 1996. Biostatistical analyses, Prentice Hall, London, 660 p.Google Scholar