Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:58:36.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Daniel Lord Smail On Deep History and the Brain Berkeley University of California Press, 2008, XIV-271 p. - Andrew Shryock et Daniel Lord Smail (éd.) Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present Berkeley, University of California Press, 2011, XVII-342 p.

Review products

Daniel Lord Smail On Deep History and the Brain Berkeley University of California Press, 2008, XIV-271 p.
Andrew Shryock et Daniel Lord Smail (éd.) Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present Berkeley, University of California Press, 2011, XVII-342 p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Guillaume Calafat
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Historiographie et sciences sociales (comptes rendus)
Information
Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 437 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Les Éditions de l’EHESS 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- Voir Mandressi, Rafael, « Le temps profond et le temps perdu. Usages des neurosciences et des sciences cognitives en histoire », Revue d’histoire des sciences humaines, 25-2, 2011, p. 165–202 Google Scholar ; ainsi que les dossiers « Daniel L. Smail et la ‘neuro-histoire’ », in Allard, O., Calafat, G. et La Valle, N. (dir.), n° hors série « Traduire et introduire », Tracés. Revue de sciences humaines, #14, 2014, p. 85–163 Google Scholar (avec une traduction du chap. 5) ; dossier « Neurohistory and History of Science », Isis, 105-1, 2014, p. 100-154, dans lesquels D. Smail revient sur sa demarche. Dans cette perspective, voir le dossier « Roundtable: History meets Biology », The American Historical Review, 119-5, 2014, p. 1492-1629.

2- Shryock, Andrew et Smail, Daniel Lord, « History and the Pre », The American Historical Review, 118-3, 2013, p. 709–737, ici p. 713Google Scholar.