Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T17:35:54.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extension of the Haseman–Elston method to multiple alleles and multiple loci: theory and practice for candidate genes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1997

M. R. STOESZ
Affiliation:
Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
J. C. COHEN
Affiliation:
Center for Human Nutrition, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235
V. MOOSER
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Genetics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235
S. MARCOVINA
Affiliation:
Northwest Lipid Research Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98103
R. GUERRA
Affiliation:
Department of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275
Get access

Abstract

The Haseman & Elston (1972) sibling-pair regression method has been used to detect and estimate the variance contribution to observed values of a quantitative trait by allelic variation in specific candidate genes. The procedure was developed under a model with a single biallelic trait locus. This assumption does not hold for several known systems. In this paper we prove that for candidate gene analysis the Haseman–Elston procedure extends to the case of multiple trait loci, each possibly having more than two alleles. Simulation experiments comparing single-locus to two-locus models show that fitting the extended regression equations maintains nominal significance levels, but the power to detect linkage to trait variation is not improved by including additional loci. These results indicate that the original proposal is statistically robust to violations of the underlying genetic model. Practical issues associated with quantifying the relative variance contribution by individual loci are also discussed. Applications of the extended regression equations to lipoprotein(a) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol are given for illustration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© University College London 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)