Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2013
A re-examination of the EH II architecture at Zygouries and other sites suggests that the traditional model of rectangular houses with two or three rooms may be inappropriate in many instances, and that in fact domestic architecture of the period, while showing greater diversity of form than has hitherto been supposed, may instead have been based on larger and more complex structures.
2 e.g. Themelis, P. G., ‘Early Helladic monumental architecture’, AM 99 (1984), 335–51Google Scholar; Konsola, D. N., ‘Beobachtungen zum Wegenetz in frühhelladischen Siedlungen’, AA (1984), 197–210Google Scholar; Shaw, J. W., ‘The Early Helladic II corridor house: development and form’, AJA 91 (1987), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Zygouries, 6 (my emphases).
4 e.g. Overbeck, J. C., A Study of Early Helladic Architecture (University Microfilms, 1963), 145.Google Scholar
5 Organisation, 254–5.
6 e.g. Overbeck (n. 4), 146; Themelis (n. 2), 337–8; Hiller, S., ‘Early and Late Helladic Megara: questions of architectural continuity in bronze age Greece’, in Architecture, 85–9.Google Scholar
7 Kilian, K., ‘The circular building at Tiryns’, in Architecture 65–71.Google Scholar
8 Pullen notes the existence of such clusters at Tiryns, Lithares, and perhaps Zygouries, and implies that they were non-domestic in function; see Organisation, 257–8.
9 zygouries, 4–5 (my emphasis).
10 Naroll, R., ‘Floor area and settlement population’, American Antiquity, 27 (1962), 587–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; but see also Leblanc, S., ‘An addition to Naroll's suggested floor area and settlement population relationship’, American Antiquity, 36 (1971), 210–11)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cook, S. F. and Heizer, R. F., ‘Relationships among houses, settlement areas and populations in aboriginal California’, in Chang, K. C. (ed.), Settlement Patterns in Archaeology (Addison–Wesley Modular Publications in Anthropology 24; 1968), 79–116.Google Scholar
11 Watson, P. J., ‘Architectural differentiation in some near eastern communities, prehistoric and contemporary’, in Redman, C. L.et al. (eds), Social Archaeology: Beyond Subsistence and Dating (New York, 1978), 131–58.Google Scholar
12 Whitelaw, T. M., ‘The settlement at Fournou Korifi, Myrtos and aspects of Early Minoan social organisation’, in Krzyszkowska, O. and Nixon, L. (eds), Minoan Society (Bristol, 1913), 323–45Google Scholar; Organisation, 262.
13 Organisation, 260.
14 Harrison, S. G., Settlement Patterns in Early Bronze Age Greece: An Approach to the Study of a Prehistoric Society (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Nottingham, 1992), appendix 1.Google Scholar
15 Zygouries, 6.
16 Pullen, D., ‘A House of Tiles at Zygouries? The function of monumental EH architecture’, in Architecture, 79–84.Google Scholar
17 Ibid.
18 Zygouries, 19.
19 Overbeck (n. 4), 69; Organisation, 203.
20 Zygouries, 21.
21 It has been suggested, for example, that house Y was a monumental building similar to the ‘House of Tiles’ at Lerna: Organisation, 200; Felten, F., ‘Early urban history and architecture of ancient Aigina’, in Architecture, 21–8.Google Scholar
22 Mylonas, G. E., Aghios Kosmas: An Early Helladic Settlement and Cemetery in Attica (Princeton, 1959), 43–4.Google Scholar
23 Frödin, O. and Persson, A. W., Asine: Results of the Swedish Excavations, 1922–1930 (Stockholm, 1938), 91–2Google Scholar; Overbeck (n. 4), 17–18; Pullen, D., ‘Asine, Berbati and the chronology of early bronze age Greece’, AJA 91 (1987), 538–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Pullen (n. 23), 539.
25 Theocharis, D. R., ‘Ἀνασϰαφὴ ἐν Ἀραφῆνι’, PAE (1954), 104–13Google Scholar; id. ‘᾿Ανασϰαφὴ ἐν ᾿Αραφῆι’ PAE (1955), 109–17; id.‘᾿Ασϰηταριό: πρωτοελλαδιϰὴ ἀϰρόλις παρὰ τὴν Pαφῆναν’, Arch. Eph. (1953–4), iii. 59–76.
26 Säflund, G., Excavations at Berbati, 1936–1937 (Stockholm, 1965), 93.Google Scholar
27 Organisation, 193.
28 Goldman, H., Excavations at Eutresis in Boeotia (Cambridge, Mass., 1931), 15–20.Google Scholar
29 Walter, H. and Felten, F., Alt-Ägina, iii (Mainz, 1981), fig. 4.Google Scholar
30 Tzavella-Evjen, H., Lithares: An Early Bronze Age Settlement in Boeotia (Los Angeles, 1985), 12–13.Google Scholar
31 Ibid. 12.
32 Ibid. 13–15.
33 Sampson, A., Manika, i (Athens, 1985), 322–7Google Scholar; id., Manika, ii (Athens, 1988).
34 Sampson 1985 (n. 33), 379.
35 Ibid; Sampson, A., ‘Architecture and urbanization in Manika, Chalkis’, in Architecture, 48.Google Scholar
36 Sampson 1985 (n. 33), 379–80.
37 Theocharis, D. R., ‘Ἀνασϰαφὴ ἐν Ἀραφῆνι’, PAE (1951), 77–92Google Scholar; id. ‘᾿Ανασϰαφὴ ἐν Αραφῆνι’, PAE (1952), 129–51; id. ‘᾿Ανασϰαφὴ ἐν ᾿Αραφῆνι’ PAE (1953), 105–18.
38 Kilian (n. 7), 69–70.
39 Pullen, D., ‘The early bronze age settlement at Tsoungiza hill, ancient Nemea’, in Architecture, 74.Google Scholar
40 Ibid. 75–6.
41 Organisation, 259–63.
42 The data are set out in full in Harrison (n. 14), appendix 1.
43 Incidentally, the EH III pattern is not too dissimilar: both apsidal and rectilinear buildings could easily cover 60–70 sq m, as is shown by houses A1, B1, C1, and D1 at Lerna and house H at Eutresis. The Lerna evidence would suggest that these larger structures were sometimes associated with smaller buildings in the range 20–30 sq m.
44 Tzavella-Evjen (n. 30), 12.
45 Goldman (n. 28), 9.
