Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T16:23:14.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Some Inscriptions of the Milesian Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2013

Extract

The above text is published by G. Manganaro in his valuable and well-illustrated corpus of the inscriptions of the Milesian islands. The stone on which it is inscribed was dug up in a garden on the island of Lipsous (ancient Lepsia) in 1956 and studied by Manganaro on his visit there in 1962. The inscription, of late date, is cut at the foot of a grave stele, of whose sculptured relief surface the lesser portion survives with the lower part of a standing woman and seated man facing one another. The lettering is poor and shallow; and, to judge by the photograph in fig. 22, the text leaves a good deal of room for conjecture.

Manganaro's restoration is full of interest. In explanation he says: ‘The dead woman was buried by her father, who perhaps killed her, notwithstanding her many lamentations (συμβο(ά)-σασαν πολλά), in a ravine or valley into which he had thrown her. The reason? Her desertion of her husband Apollodorus, toward whom the lady must have cherished an aversion (ἐκ δυσμενυίας) At the age of forty, in the splendour of her youthful prime, she, the sacrificer (θύτρια), found her tomb (βωμόσ).’

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ann. xli–xlii (1963–4) 325–7.

2 Ibid. 295, 318, and 326.

3 Cf. also the remarks of Robert, J. and Robert, L. on this matter, RÉG lxxix (1966) 412–13.Google Scholar

4 Cf. Bean, and Cook, , BSA lii (1957) 135, 137.Google Scholar

5 Ibid. 137, no. 3.

6 Ann. xli–xlii. 328, nos. 30 and 29.

7 Ibid. 322, but not seen by him.

8 RÉG lxxix. 412. In finding fault with the original editors for leaving the reader to divine their intentions on the meaning of ἡ Αι—in the same line the Roberts have failed to notice that what the printed text shows is not a capital of text fount but a broken-barred facsimile alpha. This followed an accepted convention for disclaiming ‘intentions’.

9 Ancient Leros (1963) 32.

10 BSA lii (1957) 135, n. 328.

11 CR. N.S. xiv (1964) 356; RÉG lxxviii (1965) 143.

12 AJA lxix (1965) 379–80.

13 RÉG lxxix (1966) 409–10, 341–2, 417.

14 Ancient Leros 7–9, 32, pls. 12e and 14c.

15 Ann. xli–xlii (1963–4) 310–12, nos. 7–9; cf. p. 300.