Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:00:33.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Set in stone: the role of relief-carved stone vessels in Neopalatial Minoan elite propaganda1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Wendy Logue
Wendy Logue
Affiliation:
British School at Athens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two major works have been published that consider in detail Minoan relief-carved stone vessels, Peter Warren's Minoan Stone Vases (1969) and Bernd Kaiser's Untersuchungen zum minoischen Relief (1976). However, while both these texts provide useful catalogues of the vessels that had been discovered up to the time of their writing, neither provides an analysis of these vessels that considers the body of artefacts as a whole, rather than as a series of individual pieces. This trend has continued until the present day, with numerous articles appearing on the more famous pieces, such as the Harvester Vase and the Boxer Rhyton, but nothing examining the entire corpus of material. In this paper it is argued that when these vessels are considered together they produce an important indication of the sources of power that were used by the elite of Minoan society, specifically the male members of the elite, to justify and reinforce their elevated position in society, and furthermore, that the message of these vessels was aimed at other members of elite society as well as the non-elite.

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , Volume 99 , November 2004 , pp. 149 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © The Council, British School at Athens 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Kaiser (1976) and Warren, MSV. Kaiser has a comprehensive list of publications up to 1971 for the pieces he publishes. A comprehensive study of the non relief-carved stone vessels has recently been completed: Bevan, A., ‘Value Regimes in the Eastern Mediterranean Bronze Age: A Study through Stone Vessels’ (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 2001)Google Scholar.

3 Four of these 37 pieces were found at Mainland Greek sites; since there is no consensus on the original source of these four vessels they will not be included in this discussion. Three other pieces are known but are generally regarded as fakes. All the published pieces can be found in Kaiser (1976) or Warren MSV except for a new marine image from Palaikastro published in MacGillivray, J. A. et al. , ‘Excavations at Palaikastro, 1994 and 1996’, BSA 93 (1998), 221–68Google Scholar at 226 and the Malia Triton in Baurain and Darque, Malia.

4 Knappett, C., ‘Mind the gap: between pots and politics in Minoan studies’, in Hamilakis, Y. (ed.), Labyrinth Revisited: Rethinking ‘Minoan’ Archaeology (Oxbow, 2002), 167–88Google Scholar at 179.

5 Higgins, R. H., Minoan and Mycenaean Art (London, 1967), 153Google Scholar suggested that all the relief-carved stone vessels were originally covered in gold leaf, but there is no evidence to support this supposition.

6 Knappett (n. 4), 177.

7 Forsdyke, J., ‘Minos of Crete’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 15 (1952), 13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 14–16; Glotz, G., La Civilisation égéenne (Paris, 1952), 159Google Scholar; Koehl, R., ‘The natur of Minoan kingship’ in Aegaeum, 11, 23–35Google Scholar at 3–4.

8 Davis, E. N., ‘Art and politics in the Aegean: the missing ruler’, in Aegaeum 11, 11–19Google Scholar at 18.

9 Driessen, J., Schoep, I., and Laffineur, R. (eds), Monuments of Minos. Rethinking the Minoan Palaces (Aegaeum 23; University of Liege, 2002)Google Scholar. See especially papers by J. Driessen, I. Schoep, and Y. Hamilakis. However, papers by Warren and Betancourt still take the traditional view that there must have been a single ruler leading Minoan society.

10 Earle (1997), 70.

11 T. K. Earle, ‘Specialisation and the production of wealth. Hawaiian chiefdoms and the Inka empire’, in Brumfiel and Earle, 64–75 at 68.

12 Gilman, A., ‘Unequal development in Copper Age Iberia’, in Brumfiel and Earle, 22–9Google Scholar.

13 D'Altroy, T. N. and Earle, T. K., ‘Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy’, Current Anthropology, 26. 2 (1985), 187–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar a 193.

14 Physical indications of a military consciousness are evident in the material remains. As early as the EBA it appears that functional weapons existed on Crete, see A. A. D. Peatfield, ‘The paradox of violence: weaponry and martial art in Minoan Crete’, in Polemos, 67–72; K. Branigan, ‘The nature of warfare in the southern Aegean during the third millennium B.C.’, in ibid., 87–92. Sanders, N. K., ‘Later Aegean bronze swords’, AJA 67 (1963), 117–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar argues that the A, C, and Di sword types were developed on Crete. S. Chryssoulaki, ‘Minoan roads and guard houses—war regained’, in Polemos, 75–83 records a number of guardhouses which appear to guard a road network around Kato Zakros, Palaikastro, and Katsounaki. Finally there is some evidence that the Minoans had a deity with a martial aspect. See P. Rehak, ‘The Mycenaean goddess revisited’, in Polemos, 227–37; Danielidou, D., Η Οχτωʹσχημη Ασπιʹδα στο Αιγαιʹο της 2 π.Χ. ΧιλιετιʹαςGoogle Scholar, (Athens, 1998), 90Google Scholar. As more and more evidence emerges, the denial of a military aspect to Minoan society seems increasingly difficult to accept.

15 Collins, R., Conflict Sociology: Towards an Explanatory Science (London, 1975), 366Google Scholar.

16 Webster, D., ‘Warfare and the evolution of the state: a reconsideration’, American Antiquity, 40 (1975), 467–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Schoep, I., ‘Tablets and territories? Reconstructing Late Minoan IB political geography through undeciphered documents’, AJA 103 (1999), 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Broodbank, C., An Island Archaeology of the Early Cyclades (Cambridge, 2000), 9Google Scholar.

19 Earle (1997), 8.

20 Ibid., 106.

21 Hodder, I., The Present Past: An Introduction to Anthropology for Archaeologists (London, 1982), 167Google Scholar.

22 M. Rowlands, ‘Power and moral order in precolonial west-central Africa’, in Brumfiel and Earle, 52–63 at 52.

23 Earle (1997), 52.

24 D'Altroy and Earle (n. 13), 187.

25 Hodder, I., Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology (Cambridge, 1986), 50Google Scholar.

26 Warren, P., Minoan Religion as Ritual Action (SIMA 72; Sweden, 1988), 13Google Scholar.

27 Platon, N., “Τὸ Ιερὸν Μας αʹ χαὶ τὰ μινωϊχὰ ῾Ιερὰ Κορυφὴς”, Kr. Chron. 5 (1951), 97–160Google Scholar at 154 ff.; Alexiou, S., “Νεα Παραʹσταις Λατρειʹας ὲπὶ Μινωϊχουʹ ᾿Αναʹγλυφου ᾿Αγγειʹου”, Kr. Chron. 13 (1959) 346–52Google Scholar.

28 Cameron, M. A. S.., ‘A General Study of Minoan Wall Paintings with Particular Reference to Unpublished Wall Paintings from Knossos’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1974), 81Google Scholar.

29 Evans, A. J., ‘Mycenaean tree and pillar cult and its Mediterranean relations’, JHS 11 (1901), 99–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar at 101–4.

30 e.g. Evans, PM ii. 614; Müller, K. ‘Frühmykenische Reliefs aus Kreta und vom griechischen Festland’ JdI 30 (1915), 242–336Google Scholar at 261; Savignoni, L., ‘Scavi e scoperte nella necropoli di Phaestos’ Mon. Linc. 14 (1904), 500–666Google Scholar at 589–90.

31 Säflund, G., ‘The agoge of the Minoan youth as reflected by palatial iconography’, in Hägg, R. and Marinatos, N. (eds), The Function of the Minoan Palaces (Stockholm, 1987), 227–33Google Scholar at 231.

32 Evans, A. J., ‘The Palace of Knossos. Provisional report for the year 1903’, BSA 9 (1902–1903), 1–153Google Scholar at 130; Nilsson, M. P., The Minoan-Mycenaean Religion and its Survivalin Greek Religion (revised edn., Lund, 1950), 183Google Scholar.

33 Baurain and Darque, Malia. For illustrations see figs. 4–5.

34 Ibid., 56; the authors have convincingly dismissed the suggestion that it was used as a trumpet, noting that in tests the vessel provided only a barely audible sound.

35 Marinatos, N., Minoan Sacrificial Religion: Cult Practice and Symbolism (Athens, 1986), 45Google Scholar.

36 Baurain and Darque, Malia 46.

37 Ibid., 53–4; Mountjoy, P. A., ‘Ritual associations for LM IB Marine Style vases’, in Darque, P. and Poursat, J-C. (eds), L'Iconographie minoenne (BCH supp. 11; Paris, 1985), 231–42Google Scholar for the ceramic examples of Marine vessels.

38 PM i. 517–21.

39 Morris, C. E., ‘Fishy tales from Knossos: a Minoan larnax and vase-painter’, in Morris, C. E. (ed.), Klados:Essays in Honour of J. N. Coldstream (BICS supp. 63; London, 1995), 185–93Google Scholar.

40 Mountjoy (n. 37), 231.

41 Higgins (n. 5), 156; Platon, N., Zakros: The Discovery of a Lost Palace of Ancient Crete (New York, 1971), 161–9Google Scholar; for the best illustration see Christopoulos and Bastias, section on ‘Minoan Art’, fig. 45 and for a reconstruction of the shrine see Shaw, J., ‘Evidence for the Minoan tripartite shrine’, AJA 82 (1978), 429–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar, fig. 9.

42 Platon (n. 41), 161 was the first to suggest such an interpretation. See also Peatfield, A. A. D., ‘Minoan peak sanctuaries: history and society’, Op. Ath. 18 (1990), 117–31Google Scholar at 129.

43 Hitchcock, L. A. and Preziosi, D., Aegean Art and Architecture (Oxford, 1999), 140Google Scholar.

44 Marinatos, MR 12; Platon (n. 41), 166.

45 Warren, MSV 71; P. Rehak, ‘The use and destruction of Minoan stone bull's head rhyta’, in Politeia, 435–59 at 438.

46 Vapheio Ring: CMS I, 219; Campstool Fresco: Platon, N., “Συμβολὴ εὶς τηʹν σπουδὴν τῆς Μινωϊσῆς ΤοιΧογραφιʹας”, Kr. Chron. 13 (1959), 319–45Google Scholar.

47 P. Rehak (n. 45), 438.

48 PM ii. 742, 790; Hall, H. R., Aegean Archaeology: An Introduction to the Archaeology of Prehistoric Greece (London, 1925), 63Google Scholar; Forsdyke (n. 7); Glotz (n. 7), 159; Matz, F., Kreta, Mykene, Troja (Stuttgart, 1956), 98Google Scholar; Demargne, P., Aegean Art: The Origins of Greek Art (London, 1964), 149Google Scholar; Higgins (n. 5) 155. For detailed images of both the main figures and the figures with shields see Marinatos, Sp. and Hirmer, M., Crete and Mycenae (London, 1960)Google Scholar, figs. 100–2.

49 PM ii. 742.

50 Krattenmaker, K., ‘Palace, peak and sceptre: the iconography of legitimacy’, in Aegaeum 11, 49–58Google Scholar at 57.

51 Forsdyke, Glotz, Hall, and Demargne (n. 48) all assigned this figure royal status.

52 Marinatos, MR, 217–18.

53 PM ii. 792.

54 Säflund (n. 31), 227–9.

55 Koehl, R., ‘The Chieftain Cup and a Minoan rite of passage’, JHS 106 (1986), 99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar; id., ‘Ritual context’, in J. A. MacGillivray et al. (eds), The Palaikastro Kouros: A Minoan Chryselephantine Statuette and its Aegean Bronze Age Context (BSA Studies 6; London, 2000), 131–43.

56 Higgins (n. 5) 155.

57 PM iv. 400.

58 Evans, A. J., ‘The Palace of Knossos: provisional report of the excavations for the year 1901’, BSA 7 (1900–1901), 1–120Google Scholar at 44; Lorimer, H. L., Homer and the Monuments (London, 1950), 279–80Google Scholar; Smith, W. S., Interconnections in the Ancient Near East (New Haven, 1965), 71Google Scholar. For the best illustration see Warren, MSV P473.

59 Evans (n. 58).

60 Morgan, L., The Miniature Wall Paintings of Thera. A Study in Aegean Culture and Iconography (Cambridge, 1988), 153Google Scholar.

61 Morris, C. E., ‘In pursuit of the white-tusked boar: aspects of hunting in Mycenaean society’, in Hägg, R. and Nordquist, G. C. (eds), Celebrations of Death and Divinity in the Bronze Age Argolid (Stockholm, 1990), 149Google Scholar–55 at 150.

62 Katsamba Pyxis: Hood, M. S. F., The Arts in Prehistoric Greece (London, 1978), ill. 111 bGoogle Scholar; Lasithi Dagger: Long, C. R., ‘The Lasithi Dagger’, AJA 82 (1978), 35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 See Vermeule, E. T., Greece in the Bronze Age (London, 1964), 103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lorimer (n. 58), 279–80; Smith (n. 58), 71.

64 Hamilakis, Y., ‘The sacred geography of hunting: wild animals, social power and gender in early farming societies’, in Kotjabopoulou, E. et al. , Zooarchaeology in Greece: Recent Advances (BSA Studies 9; London, 2003), 239–47 at 243Google Scholar.

65 PM i. 676; Bosanquet, R. C. and Dawkins, R. M., The Unpublished Objects from the Palaikastro Excavations 1902–1906 (BSA Suppl. Paper No. 1; London, 1923), 136–7Google Scholar.

66 Long (n. 62), 41–5.

67 Hood, M. S. F. and de Jong, P., ‘Late Minoan warrior graves from Ayios Ioannis and the new hospital site at Knossos’, BSA 47 (1952), 243–77 at 261Google Scholar.

68 B. Wilkens, ‘Hunting and breeding in Ancient Crete’, in Kotjabopoulou et al. (n. 64), 85–90.

69 Hall, H. R., The Civilization of Greece in the Bronze Age (London, 1928), 159Google Scholar; Schachermeyer, F., ‘Die Szenen komposition der minoischen Bildkunst und ihre Bedeutung für die Beurteilung der altkretischen Kultur’, Kr. Chron. 15–16 (1961–1962), 177–85Google Scholar at 183; For illustrations see Christopoulos and Bastias, section ‘Minoan Art’, figs. 39–41.

70 Marinatos, MR 214.

71 Säflund (n. 31), 231.

72 Marinatos, MR 213.

73 Evans (n. 58), 96; PM i. 363–4.

74 Müller (n. 30), 259 suggests that this is a bull-leaper, but on comparison with other boxers the figure is too similar in physique to be identified as anything else; Warren, MSV 90.

75 PM iv. 600.

76 For instance Marinatos, MR 214 suggested that the top register of the Boxer Rhyton showed a scene of wrestling, but the poses of the figures in this image when compared with other examples of boxers almost certainly identifies them as boxers and not wrestlers. Furthermore, the figures on the Boxer Rhyton are wearing gloves which is not a practice of wrestling.

77 Mayer, M., ‘Mykenisch Beiträge’, Jdl 7 (1892), 72–81Google Scholar; Reichel, A., ‘Die Stierspiele in der kretisch mykenischen Cultur’, AM 34 (1909), 85–99Google Scholar.

78 Warren, , MSV 85 Kaiser (1976), 31Google Scholar. While Warren records this piece as coming from the Knossos area category, Kaiser is less sure of its original findspot, putting Knossos only as a possible location.

79 Kaiser (1976), 15–16; Popham, M. R. et al. , The Minoan Unexplored Mansion at Knossos (BSA Supp. 17; London, 1984), 234–5Google Scholar.

80 Marinatos, N., ‘The bull as an adversary: some observations on bull-hunting and bull-leaping’, Αϱιάδνη, 5 (1989), 23–32Google Scholar at 25.

81 J. G Younger, ‘Bronze Age representations of Aegean bull-games, III’, in Politeia, 507–44 at 523.

82 Morgan, L., ‘Of animals and men: the symbolic parallel’, in Morris (ed.) (n. 39), 171–84 at 171Google Scholar.

83 Marinatos, MR 219.

84 Marinatos, N., Minoan Sacrificial Religion: Cult Practice and Symbolism (Athens, 1986), 67–9Google Scholar.

85 Warren, MSV 85–6.

86 Danielidou (n. 14).

87 Illustration in Vassilakis, A., Minoan Crete: From Myth to History (Athens, no date), 92Google Scholar.

88 Cameron (n. 28) 156 suggested that these were the breasts of a goddess, but they may equally be from a priestess playing the part of a deity. Either interpretation is possible since Kaiser (1976), 281 notes that they were found with a relief ‘snake frame’.

89 B. P. Hallager and E. Hallager, ‘The Knossian bull: politicalpropagandainneo-palatialCrete?’ in Poteia, 547–56.

90 Betts, J. H., ‘New light on Minoan bureaucracy: a re-examination of some Cretan sealings’, Kadmos, 6 (1967). 15–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 ‘ Younger (n. 81) 509.

92 Savignoni, L., ‘Il vaso di Haghia Triada’, Mon. Linc. 13 (1903), 78–131Google Scholar; Forsdyke, , ‘The “Harvester” Vase of Hagia Triada’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 17 (1954), 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For illustrations see Christopoulos and Bastias, section ‘Minoan Art’, figs. 42–3.

93 Rodenwalt, G., Der Fries des Megarons von Mykenai (Halle, 1921), 13Google Scholar.

94 Müller (n. 30), 255 suggests that the stooping man is reaching forward to grasp the loincloth of the man in front, who turns to rebuke him. Hood (n. 62), 146, suggests that the stooping man is drunk, or possibly dancing and abusing his comrades. Pendlebury, J. S., The Archaeology of Crete: An Introduction (London, 1939), 213Google Scholar also suggested that the figures were drunk and proposes that there is an atmosphere of ‘riotous inebriety’. However, Karo, G., Greifen am Thron (2nd edn., Baden, 1959), 78Google Scholar suggests the most likely explanation, that an accident has occurred. It seems unlikely that participants of what seems to be an important occasion would be drunk and disorderly, it is more likely that the figure has stumbled and dropped his pole and is bending to pick it up or else in the process of falling. The fact that the figures march in order and in pairs also speaks against the idea that they are drunk and disorderly. Why this accident was recorded is a matter which cannot be easily explained.

95 Only one non-agricultural explanation has been put forward for this image. Halbherr, F., ‘Resti dell'età micenea: scoperti ad Haghia Triada presso Phaestos’, MonAnt 13 (1903), 5–74Google Scholar at 18–19, suggested that this was a scene of a Minoan triumph and that the figures were bringing home prisoners. However, this explanation was never adopted and it is difficult on close examination of the image to see how Halbherr came to this conclusion.

96 Müller (n. 30); Glotz (n. 7), 370; Matz (n. 48), 98; Karo (n. 94), 77; Hutchinson, R. W., Prehistoric Crete (London, 1962), 281Google Scholar.

97 Hitchcock and Preziosi (n. 43), 18.

98 Kuhrt, A., The Ancient Near East c. 3000–330, 2 vols. (London, 1995), i. 110Google Scholar.

99 Forsdyke (n. 92), 6–7.

100 Marinatos, MR 137.

101 Younger, J. G., Music in the Aegean Bronze Age (SIMA 144; Jonsered, 1998), 172–3Google Scholar.

102 Hallager, E., ‘A “harvest festival room” in the Minoan palaces? An architectural study of the Pillar Crypt Area at Knossos’, in Hägg, R. and Marinatos, N. (eds), The Function of the Minoan Palaces (Stockholm, 1987), 169–76Google Scholar.

103 Warren, , MSV 90, 102Google Scholar; Kaiser (1976), 15.

104 For the piece with bull's leg see PM i. 688–9; for the fragment from the Little Palace see Warren, MSV 77.

105 PM i. 688–9.

106 PM iii. 184; ii. 537.

107 PM ii. 47.

108 B. Alberti, ‘Gender and the figurative art of Late Bronze Age Knossos’, in Hamilakis (ed.) (n. 4), 98–117 at 99.

109 See especially Marinatos, MR 220; id. (n. 80); Indelicate, S. Damiani, ‘Were Cretan girls playing at bull leaping?’ Cretan Studies, 1 (1988), 39–47Google Scholar.

110 N. Marinatos, ‘Formalism and gender roles: a comparison of Minoan and Egyptian art’, in Politeia, 577–85.

111 Pollock, S. and Bernbeck, R., ‘And they said, Let us make gods in our image’, in Rautman, A. E. (ed.), Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record (Philadelphia, 2000), 150–64Google Scholar at 155, 160.

112 Winter, I., ‘Legitimation of authority through image and legend: seals belonging to officials in the administrative bureaucracy of the Ur III state’, in Gibson, McG. and Biggs, R. D. (eds), The Organization of Power. Aspects of Bureaucracy in the Ancient Near East (SAOC No. 46; Chicago, revised edn., 1991), 59–80Google Scholar at 79.

113 S. Hiller, ‘Scenes of warfare and combat in the arts of Aegean Late Bronze Age: reflections on typology and development’, in Polemos, 319–28 at 319.

114 Marinatos in Politeia, 577–85 at 581.

115 Lorimer (n. 58), 220.

116 Dimopoulou, N., “Ανασχσφιχεʹς Εργασιʹες. Ποʹρος Ηραχλειʹου ᾿’, A. Delt. 49 (1994), B2, 707–10 at 708–9Google Scholar.

117 Marinatos, MR 212.

118 Earle (1997), 152.

119 Cited in Wallace, R. A. and Wolf, A., Contemporary Sociological Theory (5th edn., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999), 77Google Scholar.

120 Hamilakis, Y., ‘Too many chiefs? Factional competition in neopalatial Crete’, in Driessen, Schoep, and Laffineur (eds) (n. 9), 179–99Google Scholar.