^{page 78 note 1} Arndt-Amelung, , Einzelaufnahmen, 714.Google Scholar

^{page 78 note 2} Pentelic marble. Total height 1·23 m. The upper part of the head was referred to by Sanborn in a paper read at Athens in or about 1912. The cruciform arrangement of marks on the forehead shows that the defacement here was at Christian hands: the injuries to the right eye are also clearly deliberate.

^{page 78 note 3} Guida, No. 273, p. 88. The herm-bust as well as the nose is restored.

^{page 78 note 4} Arndt-Amelung, op. cit., p. 557.

^{page 78 note 5} MacDowall, , J.H.S., xxiv. (1904), p. 255Google Scholar, note 1, d. I was not able to see this head in Florence; very probably its position has been altered during the recent rearrangement of the Museum.

^{page 79 note 1}

^{page 82 note 1} Arch. Anz., 1915, p. 279 ff.

^{page 82 note 2} Arndt-Amelung, op. cit., 557.

^{page 83 note 1} Mr. Forsdyke kindly informs me that the British Museum copy agrees in the measurements of the head with the Vatican and Athens copies, and so should derive from the same original or a copy of the same original. We may recall the Persephone type of the late fifth or early fourth century, which undergoes a like modification in the drapery at the hands of sculptors of the Roman period. Compare the Eleusis relief cited by Amelung, , Basis, p. 53Google Scholar, with the same type used in a Roman portrait statue, Helbig, 1174 (Lateran). Less closely-dated copies of the same type modified in a similar way are too numerous to mention.

^{page 84 note 1} Also mentioned in the paper referred to in note 2, p. 78. Greyish island marble. Measurements agree with the Vatican statue except in this particular: lowest point right ear to highest point forehead:—Vatican ·198 m.; Corinth ·176 m. Do. left side:— Vatican ·203 m.; Corinth ·19 m.

^{page 84 note 2} A.J.A., vi. (1902), Pl. XVII.

^{page 85 note 1} This feature, though it seems, especially in the British Museum copy, to disturb the balance of the statue, was almost certainly present in the original. The Vatican statue has a projection in the chiton at ground-level which is of the same breadth as the remains of the British Museum left foot.

^{page 86 note 1} Peiraeus Museum. No. 374. Pentelic marble. Unrestored. Found September 1st, 1914, in the house of Antonios Kanellas, Valaneion St., Peiraeus, in a cistern, apparently on the site of ancient baths. Total height to present lowest point of beard ·32 m. Breadth of head (immediately below ears) ·15 m. approx. Breadth of face across eyes (outer corner of lids) ·11 m. Breadth of face (outer ends eyebrow-bones as far back as front of clustering locks) ·137 m. Lowest point of hair-band to lowest point of upper lip ·148 m. Mouth (at level of lowest point of upper lip to inside edges of moustache) ·045 m. Height of eye (max. excl. lids) ·037 m. Length of eye (excl. lids) ·014 m. Height of ear (max.) ·056 m. In the numerous adaptations of the type to herm form, the hair is almost invariably modified by the addition of shoulder-locks, and the arrangement at the back conventionalised.

^{page 86 note 2} Dickins, , Catalogue of the Acropolis Museum, i. p. 266, No. 699.Google Scholar

^{page 87 note 1} Macchioro, , Jahreshefte, xii. (1908), p. 189Google Scholar; Wolters, , Jahrbuch, iii. (1893), p. 177.Google Scholar

^{page 87 note 2} The evidence of the ear is neutral: missing in the Athens copy, in the Vatican statue, though, like the eye, it is executed without refinement, its main design corresponds to that employed by Praxiteles. We know only the lower part of a Kephisodotean ear.

^{page 87 note 3} E.g. Arndt-Amelung, op. cit., 1778 (Madrid).

^{page 87 note 4} I am indebted to Dr. Ernst Kjellberg both for drawing my attention to this head and for giving me a photograph of it. There is what I believe to be a replica (set on the body of an Apollo Sauroktonos and injured by drastic cleaning) at Ince-Blundell (Michaelis, , Anc. Marbles, p. 339, No. 12).Google Scholar