Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T03:43:12.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Listening Abilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2010

Geoff Brindley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the last two decades, research has highlighted the important role that listening plays in language acquisition (Brown and Yule 1983, Ellis, et al. 1994, Faerch and Kasper 1986, Feyten 1991, Long 1985), and listening comprehension skills have begun to receive a lot more systematic attention in language teaching classrooms. A wide range of books, articles, and materials aimed at assisting teachers to develop learners’ listening skills are now available, and a variety of comprehension-based methodologies have been proposed (see, for example, Anderson and Lynch 1988, Courchene, et al. 1992, Rost 1990; 1994, Underwood 1989). However, although many of the tasks used for teaching listening are virtually identical to those which appear in tests, assessment of listening ability has received relatively limited coverage in the language testing literature.

Type
Assessing Language Abilities
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 18 , March 1998 , pp. 171 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alderson, J. C. 1988. Innovation in language testing: Can the micro-computer help? Lancaster: University of Lancaster. [Special Report No 1: Language Testing Update.]Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. 1990a. Testing reading comprehension skills (Part One). Reading in a Foreign Language. 6.2.425–438.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. 1990b. Testing reading comprehension skills (Part Two). Reading in a Foreign Language. 7.1.465–503.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C. and Wall, D.. 1995. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C., and Lukmani, Y.. 1989. Cognition and reading: Cognitive levels as embodied in test questions. Reading in a Foreign Language. 5.2.253–270.Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. 1986. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. and Lynch, T.. 1988. Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacheller, F. 1980. Communicative effectiveness as predicted by judgements of the severity of learner errors in dictation. In Oiler, J. W. Jr. and Perkins, K. (eds.) Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 66–71.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baltova, I. 1994. The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review. 50.507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berne, J. E. 1993. The role of text type, assessment task and target language experience in L2 listening comprehension assessment. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Association for Applied Linguistics and the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese. Atlanta, GA, March 1993, and Cancun, Mexico, August 1992. [ED 358737.]Google Scholar
Berne, J. E. 1995. How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania. 78.316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J. 1984. Factors affecting listening comprehension. ELT Journal. 38.34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, J. and Suen, D. L. K.. 1994. Communicative considerations in a large-scale listening test. In Boyle, J. and Falvey, P. (eds.) English language testing in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press. 32–55.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. Forthcoming a. Investigating second language listening ability: Listening skills and item difficulty. In G. Brindley and G. Wigglesworth (eds.) ACCESS: Issues in language test design and delivery. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. Forthcoming b. Describing language development? Rating scales and second language acquisition. In L. F. Bachman and A. D. Cohen (eds.) Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brindley, G., Hood, S., McNaught, C. and Wigglesworth, G.. Forthcoming. Issues in test design and delivery. In G. Brindley and G. Wigglesworth (eds.) ACCESS: Issues in language test design and delivery. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. and Nunan, D.. 1992. Draft bandscales for listening. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University. [IELTS Research Project 1.]Google Scholar
Brindley, G. and Ross, S.. 1997. Trait-method comparisons across three language test batteries using exploratory, MTMM and structural equation modelling approaches. Paper presented at 19th Annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Orlando, Florida, March 1997.Google Scholar
Brown, G. and Yule, G.. 1983. Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buck, G. 1991. The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing. 8.67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. 1992. Listening comprehension: Construct validity and trait characteristics. Language Learning. 42.313–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. 1994. The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension. Language Testing. 11.145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, S. and Doherty, J.. 1992. Testing receptive skills within a comprehension-based approach. In Courchene, R. J., Glidden, J. I., St. John, J. and Therien, C. (eds.) Comprehension-based second language teaching. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 299–318.Google Scholar
Burstein, J., Frase, L. T., Ginther, A. and Grant, L.. 1996. Technologies for language assessment. In Grabe, W., et al. (eds.) Annual Review ofApplied Linguistics, 16. Technology and language. New York: Cambridge University Press. 240–260.Google Scholar
Call, E. M. 1985. Auditory short-term memory, listening comprehension and the input hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly. 19.765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, B. J. and Hall, P.. 1985. Make your own language tests. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Carroll, B. J. and West, R.. 1989. ESU framework. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. 1994. Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Coniam, D. 1996. Computerized dictation for assessing listening proficiency. CALICO Journal. 13.3.73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbel, C. 1993. Computer-enhanced language assessment. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Courchene, R. J., Glidden, G. I., St. John, J. and Therien, C. (eds.) 1992. Comprehension-based second language teaching. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. H. A. L. 1987. Defining tests for proficiency in listening comprehension: A response to Dan Douglas's “Testing listening comprehension.” In Valdman, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the symposium on the evaluation offoreign language proficiency. Bloomington, Illinois: Indiana University Press. 115–124.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. H. A. L. and Glas, C.. 1987. Validation of listening comprehension tests using item response theory. Language Testing. 4.170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, P. 1991a. Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly. 25.431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, P. 1991b. Computerized testing of nonparticipatory L2 listening comprehension proficiency: An ESL prototype development effort. Modem Language Journal. 75.64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkel, P. 1992. The use of PC-generated speech technology in the development of an L2 listening comprehension proficiency test: A prototype design effort. In Pennington, M. C. and Stevens, V. (eds.) Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters. 273–293.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y. and Yamazaki, A.. 1994. Classroom interaction, comprehension and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning. 44.449–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faerch, K. and Kasper, G.. 1986. The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics. 1.251–21A.Google Scholar
Feyten, C. M. 1991. The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal. 75.173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, C. and Jensen, C.. 1994. Evaluating lecture comprehension. In Flowerdew, J. (ed.) Academic listening: Research perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 241–268.Google Scholar
Hansen, C. and Jensen, C.. 1995. The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance. Language Testing. 12.99–119.Google Scholar
Heaton, J. B. 1988. Writing English language tests. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, J. M. 1992. Creating listening and speaking prochievement tests. Hispania. 75.1326–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A. 1989. Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, S. 1995. The effects of a context-embedded approach to second-language vocabulary learning. System. 23.143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, P. 1991. Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL. 29.135–149.Google Scholar
Lewkowicz, J. 1991. Testing listening comprehension: A new approach? Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching. 14.25–31.Google Scholar
Long, D. R. 1990. What you don't know can't help you. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 12.65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. 1985. Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass, S. M. and Madden, C. G. (eds.) Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 377–393.Google Scholar
MacWilliam, I. 1986. Video and language comprehension. ELT Journal. 40.131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. 1989. Validity. In Linn, R. (ed.) Educational measurement. Washington: American Council on Education and National Council on Measurement in Education. 13–103.Google Scholar
Mueller, G. A. 1980. Visual contextual cues and listening comprehension: An experiment. Modern Language Journal. 64.335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munby, J. 1978. Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powers, D. 1986. Academic demands related to listening skills. Language Testing. 3.1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progosh, D. 1996. Using video for listening assessment: Opinions of test-takers. TESL Canada Journal. 14.1.34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, P. M. 1985. Language testing and the communicative teaching curriculum. In Lee, Y. P., Lord, R., Fok, A. C. Y. Y. and Low, G. D.. New directions in language testing. Oxford: Pergamon. 15–32.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. 1983. Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly. 17.219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. and Langille, J.. Forthcoming. Negotiated discourse and interlanguage accent effects on a second language listening test. In G. Brindley and G. Wigglesworth (eds.) ACCESS: Issues in language test design and delivery. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Rost, M. 1994. Introducing listening. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. 1994. A review of second language listening comprehension research. Modern Language Journal. 78.199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruhe, V. 1996. Graphics and listening comprehension. TESL Canada Journal. 14.1.45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. 1994. The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal. 78.179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrafnagl, J. and Cameron, D.. 1988. Are you decoding me? The assessment of understanding in oral interaction. In Grunwell, P. (ed.) Applied linguistics in society. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research. 88–97.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. 1997. The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing. 14.185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shohamy, E. 1985. A practical handbook in language testing for the second language teacher. Experimental edition. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. 1994. Comprehension testing, or can understanding be measured? In Brown, G., Malmkjaer, K., Pollitt, A. and Williams, J. (eds.) Language and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 141–152.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. 1996. Assessing foreign language skills: Data from Russian. Modern Language Journal. 80.47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, M. 1989. Teaching listening. New York: Longman. University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES)/Royal Society of Arts (RSA).Google Scholar
Underwood, M. 1990. Certificates in communicative skills in English. Cambridge: RSA/UCLES.Google Scholar
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES). 1995. First Certificate in English. Cambridge: UCLES.Google Scholar