Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:33:28.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developments in Language Testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2008

Dan Douglas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In many ways, the year 1990 represented a watershed in language testing. In that year, the 12th annual Language Testing Research Colloquium took as its theme “A new decade of language testing research: Collaboration and cooperation.” The 1990 Colloquium was also dedicated to the memory of Michael Canale, whose work during the previous decade laid the groundwork for much of that of the 1990s. In 1990, a seminar sponsored by the Regional Language Centre in Singapore, on Language Testing and Programme Evaluation, focused on many of the problems in the field of language testing that militated against the hoped for progress of the 1980s. At both of these meetings, and at others involving language testing that year, discussions were held concerning the formation of an international professional association of language testers. The result was the formation of the International Language Testing Association in 1992. Also in 1990, a language testing computer “bulletin board,” LTEST-L, was established on Listserv, so that the international community of language testing researchers and practitioners could hold electronic “conferences” and share information and data on a world-wide basis. Finally, a number of important books on language testing were published in 1990, including works by Bachman, Davies, Heaton, and Weir, which have already had an influence on language testing research and development in the first half of the decade.

Type
Language Assessment and Program Evaluation
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 15 , March 1995 , pp. 166 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., and Wall, D.. In press. Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. 1990a. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S.. In press. Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. 1994a. Assessing language ability in the classroom, 2nd ed.Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Davies, A. 1990. Principles of language testing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. 1990. Communicative language testing. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Weir, C. J. 1993. Understanding and developing language tests. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

UNANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alderson, J. C. 1990a. Testing reading comprehension skills (Part one). Reading in a Foreign Language. 6.425–438.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. 1990b. Testing reading comprehension skills (Part two). Reading in a Foreign Language. 7.599–603.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. 1991. Language testing in the 1990s: How far have we come? How much further have we to go? In Anivan, S. (ed.) Current developments in language testing. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. 1–26.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. 1993. The relationship between grammar and reading in an English for academic purposes test battery. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 203–219.Google Scholar
Alderson, J. C. and Windeatt, S.. 1991. “Learner-adaptive” computer-based language tests. Language Testing Update. 9.18–21.Google Scholar
Allan, A. 1992. Development and validation of a scale to measure test-wiseness in EFL/ESL reading test takers. Language Testing. 9.101–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amer, A. A. 1993. Teaching EFL students to use a test-taking strategy. Language Testing. 10.71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N., Bachman, L., Perkins, K. and Cohen, A. D.. 1991. An exploratory study into the construct validity of a reading comprehension test: Triangulation of data sources. Language Testing. 8.41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Language Testers in Europe. 1994. The ALTE code of practice. Cambridge: ALTE.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. 1990b. Assessment and evaluation. In Kaplan, R. B. et al. (eds.) Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1989. New York: Cambridge University Press. 210–226.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F. and Milanovic, M.. 1991. The use of test method characteristics in the content analysis and design of English proficiency tests. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Princeton, NJ, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F., Davidson, F. and Palmer, A. S.. 1982. The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly. 16.449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R. E. et al. 1990a. Toward a framework for constructed response items. Princeton: Educational Testing Service. [Research Report 90–7.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R. E. et al. 1990b. The relationship of expert system scored constrained free response items to multiple-choice and open-ended items. Applied Psychological Measurement. 14.151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanche, P. 1990. Using standardized achievement and oral proficiency tests for self-assessment purposes: The DLIFLC study. Language Testing. 7.202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, R. 1992. Crossvalidation of item response curve models using TOEFL data. Language Testing. 9.79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutin, A. et al. 1993. Rasch-ionalizing: Converting to latent–trait item banking. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. 1990. Test-takers' reactions to a placement test. Language Testing. 7.13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, S. 1993. Using “real-life” academic challenges for evaluating communicative skills in English. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge, UK, 08, 1993.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. In press. Describing language development? Rating scales and SLA. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. 1993. The role of test-taker feedback in the development process: Test-takers' reactions to a tape-mediated test of proficiency in spoken Japanese. Language Testing. 10.277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D. 1990. Short-cut estimators of criterion-referenced test consistency. Language Testing. 7.77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. 1990. The testing of listening comprehension. Lancaster, UK: University of Lancaster. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Buck, G. 1992. Translation as a language testing procedure: Does it work? Language Testing. 9.123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, G. 1994. The appropriacy of psychometric measurement models for testing second language listening comprehension. Language Testing. 11.145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. 1983. The difficulty of a test and its factor composition revisited. In Wainer, H. and Messick, S. (eds.) Principles of modern psychological measurement: A festschrift for Fredric M. Lord. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 257–282.Google Scholar
Cascallar, E. 1993. New technologies for the assessment of oral proficiency in second language learners. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge, UK, 08, 1993.Google Scholar
Chalhoub-Deville, M. 1994. Scales as task and rater specific: Derived dimensions and weights. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Washington, DC, 03, 1994.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. 1994. Are C-tests valid measures for L2 vocabulary research? Second Language Research. 10.157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. In press. Construct definition and validity in SLA research. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. and Abraham, R. G.. 1990. Cloze method: What difference does it make? Language Testing. 7.121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. and Douglas, D.. 1993. Interpreting second language performance data. Paper presented at the annual Second Language Research Forum. Pittsburgh, PA, 03, 1993.Google Scholar
Choi, I. and Bachman, L. F.. 1992. An investigation into the adequacy of three IRT models for data from two EFL reading tests. Language Testing. 9.51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, C. 1991. The effect of academic discipline on reading test performance. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Princeton, NJ, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
Clapham, C. 1993. Can ESP testing be justified? In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 257–271.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. 1994b. The language used to perform cognitive operations during full-immersion maths tasks. Language Testing. 11.171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D. In press. Strategies and processes in test-taking and SLA. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. and Olshtain, E.. 1993. The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly. 27.33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. 1990. Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing. 7.31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, Weigle S. 1994. Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions. Language Testing. 11.197–223.Google Scholar
Davidson, F. 1988. An exploratory modeling survey of the trait structures of some existing language test datasets. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Davidson, F. 1994. Norms appropriacy of achievement tests: Spanish-speaking children and English children's norms. Language Testing. 11.83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, J. 1991. Some common misconceptions about IRT. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Princeton, NJ, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
De Jong, J. 1992. Certificates in Dutch as a second language. Language Testing Update. 11.25–26.Google Scholar
Dollerup, et al. 1994. “Sprogtest”: A smart test (or how to develop a reliable and anonymous EFL reading test). Language Testing. 11.65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornyei, Z. and Katona, L.. 1992. Validation of the C-test amongst Hungarian EFL learners. Language Testing. 9.187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D. 1994. Quantity and quality in speaking test performance. Language Testing. 11.125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D. In press. Testing methods in context-based second language research. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) 1993. A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.Google Scholar
Douglas, D. and Selinker, L.. 1992. Analyzing oral proficiency test performance in general and specific purpose contexts. System. 20.317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, D. 1993. Performance on general versus field-specific tests of speaking proficiency. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria. VA: TESOL Publications. 235–256.Google Scholar
Educational Testing Service (ETS). 1991. Computerized placement tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Hale, G. and Courtney, R.. 1994. The effects of note-taking on listening comprehension in the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Language Testing. 11.29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J., Lopes, M., McNamara, T. and Sheridan, E.. 1993. Rating scales and native speaker performance on a communicatively oriented EAP test. Language Testing. 10.337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J., Lopes, M., McNamara, T. and Sheridan, E. et al. 1993. Components of portfolio evaluation: ESL data. Paper presented at the annual American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, E. 1993. Components of portfolio evaluation: ESL data. Paper presented at the annual American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, E. (ed.) 1991. Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Heaton, J. B. 1990. Classroom testing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Heilenman, L. K. 1990. Self-assessment of second language ability: The role of response effects. Language Testing. 7.174–201.Google Scholar
Henning, G. 1990. National issues in individual assessment: The consideration of specialization bias in university language screening tests. In Jong, J. De and Stevenson, D. (eds.) Individualizing the assessment of language abilities. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 38–50.Google Scholar
Henning, G. 1992. Dimensionality and construct validity of language tests. Language Testing. 9.1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, G. and Cascallar, E.. 1992. A preliminary study of the nature of communicative competence. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. [TOEFL Research Reports No. 36.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, G., Johnson, P. J., Boutin, A. and Rice, H. R.. 1994. Automated assembly of pre-equated language proficiency tests. Language Testing. 11.15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henning, G., Johnson, P. J., Boutin, A. and Rice, H. R. et al. . 1993. Computer-assisted testing of reading comprehension: Comparisons among multiple-choice and open-ended scoring methods. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 123–131.Google Scholar
Hoekje, B. and Linnell, K.. 1994. “Authenticity” in language testing: Evaluating spoken language tests for international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly. 28.103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, T. 1991. Relationships among IRT item discrimination and item fit indices in criterion-referenced language testing. Language Testing. 8.160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, T. 1993a. Testing the specificity of ESP reading skills. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 58–82.Google Scholar
Hudson, T. 1993b. Nothing does not equal zero: Problems with applying developmental sequence findings to assessment and pedagogy. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 15.461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. and Wylie, E.. 1993. Assessing speaking proficiency in the International English language testing system. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 220–234.Google Scholar
Jones, N. 1994. Item banking and Item Banker. Paper presented at University of Lancaster. Lancaster, UK, 05, 1994.Google Scholar
Jonz, J. 1991a. Cloze item types and second language comprehension. Language Testing. 8.1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonz, J. 1991b. What cloze tests measure: A factor analysis with replications. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. New York, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
Kaga, M. 1991. Dictation as a measure of Japanese proficiency. Language Testing. 8.112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunnan, A. 1992. An investigation of a criterion-referenced test using G-theory, and factor and cluster analyses. Language Testing. 9.30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurier, M. 1991. What we can do with computerized adaptive testing—and what we cannot do! In Anivan, S. (ed.) Current developments in language testing. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. 244–255.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. 1993. A qualitative approach to monitoring examiner conduct in the Cambridge Assessment of Spoken English (CASE). Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge, UK, 08, 1993.Google Scholar
Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., and Dunbar, S. B.. 1991. Complex performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher. 20.8.15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, P., Janczewski, D. and Cascallar, E.. 1991. Let's not be too rash about Rasch. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Princeton, NJ, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
Lumley, T. 1993. The notion of subskills in reading comprehension tests: An EAP example. Language Testing. 10.211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, B. and Davidson, F.. 1993. Criterion-referenced language test development for teaching and research. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Pienemann, M. and Thornton, I.. 1991. Rapid profile: A second language screening procedure. Language and Language Education. 1.61–82.Google Scholar
Markstein, L. et al. 1992. A portfolio assessment experiment for college ESL students. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Vancouver, BC, 03, 1992.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. 1990. BBC/British Council English language video test. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. San Francisco, 03, 1990.Google Scholar
Masters, G. 1990. Psychometric aspects of individual assessment. In Jong, J. H. A. L. De and Stevenson, D. (eds.) Individualizing the assessment of language abilities. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 56–70.Google Scholar
McCann, P. and Teasdale, A.. 1992. Eurocontrol standard testing project: Exit test in English for air traffic control. Language Testing Update. 12.52.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. 1990. Item response theory and the validation of an ESP test for health professionals. Language Testing. 7.52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. 1991. Test dimensionality: IRT analysis of an ESP listening test. Language Testing. 8.139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. et al. 1992. Mapping abilities and skill levels using Rasch techniques. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Vancouver, BC, 03, 1992.Google Scholar
Messick, S. 1994. The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher. 23.2.13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mets, J. 1993. Exams of Dutch as a second language. Language Testing Update. 11.38–45.Google Scholar
Moss, P. 1994. Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher. 23.2.5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J. 1978. Language tests in school. London: Longman.Google Scholar
O'Malley, J. M. et al. 1993. Portfolio assessment revisited: Expanding experiences from the field. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Orr, J. K. and Predaris, T.. 1993. ESL student evaluation using portfolios. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, April, 1993.Google Scholar
Orr, J. K., Predaris, T. and Olson, P.. 1992. A portfolio approach to ESL evaluation. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Vancouver, BC, 03, 1992.Google Scholar
Parry, T. S. and Stansfield, C. (eds.) 1990. Language aptitude revisited. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall and Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Peirce, B. 1992. Demystifying the TOEFL reading test. TESOL Quarterly. 26.665–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, B., Swain, M. and Hart, D.. 1993. Self-assessment in two French immersion programmes. Applied Linguistics. 14.25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K. 1992a. The effect of passage topical structure types on ESL reading comprehension difficulty. Language Testing. 9.163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, K. and Brutten, S.. 1993. A comparison of indices for the identification of misfitting items. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 83–97.Google Scholar
Perkins, K. and Henning, G.. 1992. Differential person functioning on language proficiency tests. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Vancouver, BC, 03, 1992.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1992. Assessing second language acquisition through Rapid Profile. Sydney: University of Sydney, Language Acquisition Research Centre. [LARC Occasional papers number 3.]Google Scholar
Plakans, B. and Abraham, R.. 1990. The testing and evaluation of international teaching assistants. In Douglas, D. (ed.), English language testing in U.S. colleges and universities. Washington, DC: NAFSA. 68–81.Google Scholar
Read, J. 1990. Providing relevant content in an EAP writing test. English for Specific Purposes. 9.109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, M. et al. 1993. Designing a test of spoken English for our world. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Rekart, D. and Dunkel, P.. 1992. The utility of objective (computer) measures of the fluency of speakers of English as a second language. Applied Language Learning. 3.65–85.Google Scholar
Reynolds, T., Perkins, K. and Brutten, S.. 1994. A comparative item analysis study of a language testing instrument. Language Testing. 11.1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. 1992. Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews. Language Testing. 9.173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, D. 1993. Assessing the different components of reading comprehension: Fact or fiction. Language Testing. 10.79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sang, F. et al. 1986. Models of second language competence: A structural equation approach. Language Testing. 3.54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, M. 1991. A comparison of two methods for detecting differential item functioning in an ESL placement test. Language Testing. 8.95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville, N. and Milanovic, M.. 1991. Management of the test development process: The example of CASE. Paper presented at the annual IATEFL Conference. Exeter, UK, 04, 1991.Google Scholar
Schils, E. D. J., Poel, M. G. M. van Der and Weltens, B.. 1991. The reliability ritual. Language Testing. 8.125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schools Examinations and Assessment Commission. 1993. Mandatory code of practice for the GCSE. London: SEAC.Google Scholar
Seltzer, R. and Broukal, M.. 1990. Using video to holistically evaluate speaking skills. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. San Francisco, 03, 1990.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. In press. Language testing and SLA interfaces: The case of discourse. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. and Inbar, O.. 1991. Validation of listening comprehension tests: The effect of text and question type. Language Testing. 8.23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigott, G. and Koberl, J.. 1993. Validating the X-test. Language Testing Update. 14.53–58.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. In press. Cognitive abilities and language acquisition: An individual differences perspective. In Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (eds.) Interfaces between SLA and language testing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 1992. Topic and variation in the oral proficiency of international teaching assistants. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Spaan, M. 1993. The effect of prompt in essay examinations. In Douglas, D. and Chapelle, C. (eds.) A new decade of language testing research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications. 98–122.Google Scholar
St. John, M. J. 1990. UET(O) to UETESOL: The revised JMB examination in English for academic purposes. Language Testing Update. 8.10–14.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. 1993. Ethics, standards, and professionalism in language testing. Issues in Applied Linguistics. 4.189–206.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C., Crandall, J. and Karl, J.. 1990. An ESL proficiency test for teachers on Guam. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. San Francisco, 03, 1990.Google Scholar
Stansfield, C. and Kenyon, D.. 1992. Research on the comparability of the Oral Proficiency Interview and the Simulated Oral Proficiency Interview. System. 20.347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, V. 1991. Strategies in solving computer-based cloze: Is it reading? Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. New York, 03, 1991.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1993. Second language testing and second language acquisition: Is there a conflict with traditional psychometrics? Language Testing. 10.193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. and Buck, G.. 1994. TOEFL 2000: Language testing in the future. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Institute. Ames, IA, 07, 1994.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. 1993. Exploring bias analysis as a tool for improving rater consistency in assessing oral interaction. Language Testing. 10.305–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. and O'Loughlin, K.. 1993. An investigation of the comparability of direct and semi-direct tests of an oral interaction test. Paper presented at the annual Language Testing Research Colloquium. Cambridge, UK, 08, 1993.Google Scholar
Young, R., Perkins, K. and Brutten, S.. 1993. Designing computer-adaptive tests: A practical solution. Paper presented at the annual TESOL Convention. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar
Zuskin, R. D. 1993. A video-prompted discourse completion test: The effects of gender and grammatical proficiency level on non-native speaker interpretations of context. Paper presented at the annual American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference. Atlanta, GA, 04, 1993.Google Scholar