Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Saito, Yoshifumi
2015.
Literature and Language Learning in the EFL Classroom.
p.
61.
Article contents
Extract
An essentially interdisciplinary activity, like many areas of applied linguistics, the most immediately contingent area to stylistics remains that of literary studies, although recent years have witnessed extension into other domains such as lexicography and teaching English as a Foreign Language. This survey is divided into five main sections but, given the interrelatedness of the areas, there will be inevitable overlaps as well as potential cases for sub-categorization. The sections are: 1) Linguistic stylistics 2) Literary stylistics 3) Style and discourse A) Pedagogical stylistics 5) Stylistics and the foreign language learner.
- Type
- Stylistics and Text
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984
References
Unannotated Bibliography
Amante, D. J. 1980. Ironic language: A structuralist approach. Language and style. 13.1.15–26.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. 1983. A language of one's own: Communication-modelling systems in Mrs. Dalloway. Language and style. 16.3.343–360.Google Scholar
Barry, P. 1983. Discourse analysis revisited: A reply to H. Sopher and Tony Deyes. English language teaching journal. 37.1.44–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1980. Problems and principles in English teaching. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. 1981. Reading skills and the study of literature in a foreign language. System. 9.1.243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. and Carter, R. A. (eds.) In press. Literature and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, D. 1980. dialogue and discourse: A sociolinguistic approach to modern drama dialogue and naturally occurring conversation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Burton, D. 1982. Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. In Carter, R. A. (ed.) Language and literature. London: Allen and Unwin. 195–214.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. and Short, M. H.. 1985. Teaching study skills for English literature. Journal of applied language study. 1.3.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. H. 1982. The symbolic substance of style in presidential discourse. Style. 16.1.38–49.Google Scholar
Carter, R. A. (ed.) 1982. Language and literature: An introductory reader in stylistics. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Carter, R. A. and Burton, D. (eds.) 1982. Literary text and language study. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Carter, R. A.and Simpson, P.. 1982. The sociolinguistic analysis of narrative. Belfast working papers in language and linguistics. 6.123–152.Google Scholar
Ching, M. K. L., Haley, M. C., and Lunsford, R. F. (eds.) 1980. Linguistic perspectives on literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Crombie, W. 1983. Raymond Chandler: Burlesque, parody, paradox. Language and style. 16.2.151–168.Google Scholar
Deyes, A. 1982. Discourse analysis and literary interpretation. English language teaching journal. 36.2.119–124.Google Scholar
Dillon, G. 1981. Constructing texts: Elements of a theory of composition and style. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, S. 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1982. How to see through language: Perspective in fiction. Poetics. 11.2.213–235.Google Scholar
Grabe, W. P. 1984. Toward defining expository prose within a theory of text construction. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R. R. K. 1981. Style values: Linguistic approaches and lexi-cographic practice. Applied linguistics. 11.3.263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. 1983. The bilingual's creativity: Discoursal and stylistic strategies in contact literatures in English. Studies in the linguistic sciences. 13.2.37–55.Google Scholar
Knight, R. 1982. Literature and the language of linguists. The use of English. 33.3.58–67.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 354–396.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. and Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, B. 1983. Text as process: An integrated view of a science of texts. Journal of literary semantics. 12.1.5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailloux, S. 1982. Interpretive conventions: The reader in the study of American fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, A. H. 1981. What literature to teach: Principles of selection and class treatment. Forum. 19.1.2–7.Google Scholar
McHale, B. 1983. Unspeakable sentences, unnatural acts: Linguistics and poetics revisited. Poetics today. 4.1.17–45.Google Scholar
Muyskens, J. A. 1983. Teaching second-language literatures: Past, present and future. Modern languages journal. 67.4.413–422.Google Scholar
O'Neal, M. J. 1983. Point of view and narrative technique in the fiction of Edith Wharton. Style. 17.2.270–289.Google Scholar
Pickett, D. (ed.) 1982. Literature in foreign language teaching. London: The British Council. [Proceedings of a seminar];.Google Scholar
Power, H. W. 1981. Literature for language students: The question of value and valuable questions. Forum. 19.1.8–10.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. L. 1977. Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pulman, S. G. 1982. Are metaphors ‘creative’? Journal of literary semantics. 11.2.78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, C. E. 1983. Literary competence and the linguistic model. Journal of literary semantics. 12.1.30–72.Google Scholar
Short, M. H. 1981. Discourse analysis and drama. Applied linguistics. 2.2.180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. K. and Coulthard, R. M.. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sopher, H. 1981. Discourse analysis as an aid to literary interpretation. English language teaching journal. 35.3.328–333.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. 1982. Stir until the plot thickens. In Carter, R. A. and Burton, D. (eds.) Literary text and language study. London: Edward Arnold. 57–85.Google Scholar
Thurley, G. 1983. Counter-modernism in current critical theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toolan, M. 1983. The functioning of progressive verbal forms in the narrative of Go Down, Moses. Language and style. 16.2.211–230.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. and Pratt, M. L.. 1980. Linguistics for students of literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Trengove, G. 1983. Language as a literary medium. In Brumfit, C. J. (ed.) Teaching literature overseas: Language-based approaches. London: Pergamon Press/The British Council. 103–120.Google Scholar
van Peer, W. 1983. Poetic style and reader response: An exercise in empirical semics. Journal of literary semantics. 12.2.3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadman, K. L. 1983. ‘Private ejaculations’: Politeness strategies in George Herbert's poems directed to God. Language and style. 16.1.87–105.Google Scholar
Weber, J. 1981. Inferences and ideological point of view in Joyce's Eveline. UEA papers in linguistics. 16.17.1–21.Google Scholar
Weber, J. 1982. Frame construction and frame accommodation in a Gricean analysis of narrative. Journal of literary semantics. 11.2.90–95.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1979. Interpretative procedures and the importance of poetry. Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 153–162.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. 1983. Talking shop: Literature and ELT. English language teaching journal. 37.1.30–35.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by