Article contents
Maritime Archaeology in Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2011
Extract
The Introduction to the Institute of Field Archaeologists' Code of Conduct states that: ‘Archaeology is the study of the nature and the past behaviour of Man in his environmental setting’. One of the principal environments Man has used is the maritime one, and for convenience of exposition the term ‘maritime’ is taken here to include inland waters, lakes, rivers and estuaries, as well as the seas and oceans. This usage is not only for convenience but also because there is continuity between the sea and inland waters: they are physically connected, and often the same vessels and the same men use them.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1989
References
NOTES
1 This is a slightly expanded version of a paper read to the Society of Antiquaries on 27 September 1988.
2 Bruijn, J. R., Muller, G. W. and van Regteren Altena, H. H., Norms in the Study of Dutch Shipwrecks Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (Amsterdam, 1986)Google Scholar Reinders, R., Maritime Archaeological Heritage: Responsibility and Management Rijksdienst voor Ijsselmeer-polders Werk-document I (1986).Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Muckelroy, K., ‘Two Bronze Age cargoes in British waters’, Antiquity 54 (1980), 100–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Dean, M., ‘Evidence for possible prehistoric and Roman wrecks in British waters’, Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. Underwater Explor. 13 (1984), 78–80.Google Scholar
4 Wright, E. V., North Ferriby Boats, National Maritime Museum Monograph 23, (London, 1976).Google Scholar McGrail, S., Brigg ‘raft’ and her prehistoric environment, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 89 (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar Millett, M. and McGrail, S., ‘Archaeology of the Hasholme logboat’, Archaeol. J. 144 (1987), 69–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S., Sutton Hoo Ship Burial 1 (London, 1975).Google Scholar Fenwick, V., Graveney Boat, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 53 (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar Muckelroy, K., ‘Middle Bronze Age trade between Britain and Europe: a maritime perspective’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 47 (1981), 275–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Cunliffe, B., Mount Batten, Plymouth, Oxford Univ. Comm. Archaeol. Monograph 26 (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar Cunliffe, B., Hen-gistbury Head, Dorset, 1, Oxford Univ. Comm. Archaeol. Monograph 13 (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar Crowther, D., Willis, S. and Creighton, J., (forthcoming) ‘Topography and archaeology of Redcliff’, in Crowther, D. R. and Ellis, S. (eds.), Humber and its Environs in History and Prehistory, University of Hull.Google Scholar Coles, J. M., Somerset Levels Papers 1–14 (1975–88).Google Scholar Milne, G. and Hobley, B., Waterfront Archaeology in Britain and Northern Europe, CBA Res. Rep. 41 (London, 1981).Google Scholar Herteig, A. E., Conference on Waterfront Archaeology in North European Towns No. 2, Historisk Museum, Bergen (Bergen, 1985).Google Scholar
5 Parry, S. and McGrail, S., ‘Tredunnoc boat’, Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. Underwater Explor. 18 (1989), 43–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Marsden, P. R. V. (ed.), ‘A late Saxon logboat from Clapton, London Borough of Hackney’, Int. J. Naut. Archaeol. Underwater Explor. 18 (1989), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Roper, J., ‘Statement in report of the Committee on Culture and Education, Council of Europe’, Underwater Cultural Heritage (Strasbourg, 1978), 7.Google Scholar
8 Bass, G., ‘Marine archaeology: a misunderstood science’, Ocean Yearbook 2 (Chicago, 1980), 137–52.Google Scholar
9 Greenhill, B., ‘The Wooden World’ (talk on Radio 3) The Listener 22 January 1987.Google Scholar
10 Bass, G., ‘The promise of underwater archaeology in retrospect’, Museum 35.1 (1983), 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Obtainable from: Scottish Institute of Maritime Studies, University of St Andrews, Fife KY169AJ.
- 2
- Cited by