Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T07:27:18.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Middle Mousterian Culture and its relation to the Coombe Rock of Post-Early Mousterian Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2012

J. P. T. Burchell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The area north of the Middle Thames situated between Acton and West Drayton reveals extensive deposits which have been referred by H.M. Geological Survey to the Boyn Hill, Taplow, and Low terraces. As within the valley of the Lower Thames, these features have yielded implements and mammalian remains. In the opinion of the officers of the Geological Survey the formation of the Taplow terrace and its contained deposits occurred prior to the formation of the Coombe Rock which succeeded Early Mousterian times; further, they consider this Coombe Rock is to be equated with the ‘Trail’. It has long been established that the series of deposits revealed in a typical section cut through the so-called Taplow terrace of the Middle Thames in this district shows:

5. Surface soil.

4. ‘Trail’, often composed of slipped material from the Boyn Hill or ‘100-ft.’ terrace.

3. Brickearth, with thin layers of pebbles in its lower portion representing land-surfaces, overlying gravel with black seams.

2. Gravel, unstratified, much contorted, and containing large included masses both of solid Chalk and of London Clay.

1. Gravel, stratified, but showing a disturbed and deeply eroded upper surface penetrated by deposit no. 2.

London Clay.

Whereas deposits nos. 1, 2, and 3 have all been regarded as having been laid down by the river during the Taplow terrace stage, it would appear that this is not the case. There are reasons, archaeological and geological, for considering that these beds represent three separate periods and that only one of them (deposit no. 1) belongs to the Taplow terrace sequence proper.

It is the purpose of this article briefly to enumerate the facts which cause the correctness of the official geological reading of this type-section to be questioned.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1934 , pp. 33 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 33 note 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘London District’, 1922, pp. 54 et seq.

page 33 note 2 Ibid., pp. 61 and 68.

page 33 note 3 Ibid., pp. 61 and 68.

page 33 note 4 Brown, J. Allen, ‘Palaeolithic Man in North-West Middlesex’, 1887, p. 56Google Scholar; Proc. Geol. Assn. 1895–6, xiv, 153Google Scholaret seq.

page 34 note 1 Marsden, J. G., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1928, v, pt. 3, pp. 293Google Scholaret seq.

page 34 note 2 Dewey, H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1930, vi, pt. 3, p. 150Google Scholar.

page 34 note 3 Brown, J. Allen, Proc. Geol. Assn. 1895–1896, xiv, 156–7Google Scholar.

page 35 note 1 Brown, J. Allen, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1886, xlii, 192–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marsden, J. G., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1928, v, pt. 3, 293Google Scholaret seq.

page 36 note 1 Burchell, J. P. T., Archaeologia, 1933, lxxxiii, 67–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar (forthcoming).

page 36 note 2 Spurrell, F. C. J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1880, xxxvi, 544et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chandler, R. H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1915, ii, pt. 2, pp. 240et seq.Google Scholar

page 36 note 3 Brown, J. Allen, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1886, xlii, 192–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 37 note 1 Smith, R. A., Archaeologia, 1911, lxii, 515et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 37 note 2 Burchell, J. P. T., Archaeologia, 1933, lxxxiii, pl. xx (forthcoming)Google Scholar.