Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T15:59:32.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origins of Medieval Vessel Turning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Paola Pugsley
Affiliation:
Paola Pugsley, 59 Ekin Road, Cambridge CB5 8PS, UK. E-mail: paola_pugsley@hotmail.com

Extract

Wooden vessels were in widespread use in British households after the tenth century. Most were turned, both inside and out, and bear witness to highly developed lathe techniques. This paper considers the preceding period with a view to finding links with woodworking techniques developed either in antiquity or in the early medieval period. The quest is hampered by the limited quantity of material, as wood does not normally survive in the archaeological record. On the other hand, by taking the largest possible sample (in this case from the whole of western Europe), a scenario for the origin of medieval vessel turning can be proposed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, M 1989. Greenwood Turning, LewesGoogle Scholar
Balch, H E 1914. Wookey Hole: Its Caves and Cave Dwellers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Bulleid, A and Gray, H S G 1911. The Glastonbury Lake Village, I, GlastonburyGoogle Scholar
Capelle, T 1983. ‘Zur Produktion holzener Gefasse im vorund frühgeschichlichen Mittelund Nordeuropa’, in Das Handwerk in vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Zeit (eds Jahnkun, H, Janssen, W, Schmidt-Wiegand, R and Tiefen-bach, H), 397414, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
Desantis, P 1990. ‘Le suppellettili in legno di uso quotidiano’, in Fortuna Maris, la nave romana di Comacchio (ed Berti, F), 105–23, BolognaGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P 1994. The Reading Lathe, Newport, Isle of WightGoogle Scholar
von Dürrich, F and Menzel, W 1847. Die Heidengräber am Lupfen (bei Oberflacht), StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Earwood, C 1988. ‘Wooden containers and other wooden artefacts from the Glastonbury Lake Village’, Somerset Levels Pap, 14, 8390Google Scholar
Earwood, C 1993. Domestic Wooden Artefacts, ExeterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarnagel, W 1979. ‘Die Grabung Feddersen Wierde, Methode, Hausbau, Siedlungs- Wirtschaftsformen sowie Sozialstruktur’, Die Ergebnisse der Ausgrabung der vorgeschichtlichen Wurt Feddersen Wierde bei Bremenhaven in den Jahren 1955 bis 1963 (ed Haarnagel, W), II, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
Kossack, G 1959. Südbayern während der Halstattzeit, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Morris, C A 1982. ‘Aspects of Anglo-Saxon and Anglo-Scandinavian lathe-turning’, in Woodworking Techniques Before 1500 AD (ed McGrail, S), BAR Int Ser, 129, 245–61, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Morris, C A 1984. ‘Anglo-Saxon and medieval woodworking crafts: the manufacture and use of domestic and utilitarian wooden artefacts in the British Isles 400-1500 AD’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
Morris, C A 2000. Craft, Industry and Everyday Life: Wood and Woodworking in Anglo- Scandinavian and Medieval York, The Archaeology of York, 17/13, YorkGoogle Scholar
Naue, J 1905. Die Denkmäler der vorgeschichtlichen Metallzeit im Elsass, MunichGoogle Scholar
Paulsen, P 1992. Die Holzfunde aus dem Grdberfeld bei Oberflacht, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Pugsley, P 2003. Roman Domestic Wood, BAR Int Ser, 1118, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Raddatz, K 1987. Thorsberg Moorfunde, Offa Bücher, 65, NeumünsterGoogle Scholar
Randsborg, K 1995. Hjortspring: Warfare and Sacrifice in Early Europe, AarhusGoogle Scholar
Reginelli, G 1998. ‘Le mobilier en bois de La Tène’, unpublished mémoire de licence, NeuchâtelGoogle Scholar
Rieth, A 1940a. ‘Zur technik antiker und prähistorischer Kunst: das Holzdrechseln’, IPEK Jahrbuch für prähistorische und ethnographische Kunst, 13-14, 85107Google Scholar
Rieth, A 1940b. ‘Entwicklung der Dreschseltechnik’, Archdologische Anzeiger, 55, 616-34Google Scholar
Rieth, A and Langenbacher, K 1954. Die Entwicklung der Drehbank, Ursprünge der Technik, 1, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Sands, R 1997. Prehistoric Woodworking. Analysis and Interpretation of Bronze Age and Iron Age Toolmarks, Wood in Archaeology, 1, LondonGoogle Scholar
Schiek, S 1992. Das Gräbenfeld der Merowingenzeit bei Oberflacht, Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg, 41/1 StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P and Schuster, J 1999. ‘Dating the early layers of the Wurt-settlement Feddersen Wierde’, in In Discussion with the Past, Archaeological Studies presented to W A van Es (eds Sarffatij, H and Verwers, W J H), 97106, Zwolle, AmersfoortGoogle Scholar
Schön, M D 1999. Feddersen Wierde, Fallward, Flögeln, BremerhavenGoogle Scholar
Simpson, E 1999. ‘Early evidence for the use of the lathe in antiquity’, in Metelemata. Studies in Aegean Archaeology presented to Malcolm H. Wiener as he enters his 65th year (eds Betancourt, Ph, Karageorghis, V, Laffineur, R and Niemeier, W), Aegeum, 20, 782-8Google Scholar
van Es, W A 1967. ‘Wijster. A native village beyond the Imperial frontier, 150-425 AD’, Palaeohistoria, 11, 1595Google Scholar
van Es, W A 1968. ‘Paddepoel. Excavation of a frustrated terps’, Palaeohistoria, 14, 187352Google Scholar
Veeck, W 1924. Die Alemannen Friedhof von Oberflacht, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
Wylie, W M 1855. ‘The graves of the Alamanni at Oberflacht, Suabia’, Archaeologia, 36, 129–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar