Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T16:03:24.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Early to Middle Saxon Settlement at Quarrington, Lincolnshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2011

Gary Taylor
Affiliation:
Archaeological Project Services, The Old School, Cameron Street, Heckington, Sleaford NG34 9RW, UK. E-mail: . (GT)
Carol Allen
Affiliation:
Oxford Archaeology North, Storey Institute, Meeting House Lane, Lancaster LA1 1TF, UK. E-mail: . (CA)
Justine Bayley
Affiliation:
English Heritage Centre for Archaeology, Fort Cumberland, Fort Cumberland Road, Eastney, Portsmouth PO4 9LD, UK. E-mail: . (JB)
Jane Cowgill
Affiliation:
25 Main Street, South Rauceby, Sleaford NG34 8QG, UK. E-mail: . (JC)
Val Fryer
Affiliation:
Church Farm, Sisland, Loddon, Norfolk NR14 6EF, UK. E-mail: . (VF)
Carol Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield, Northgate House, West Street, Sheffield S1 4ET, UK. E-mail: . (CP)
Barbara Precious
Affiliation:
25 West Parade, Lincoln LN1 1NW, UK. E-mail: . (BP)
James Rackham
Affiliation:
The Environmental Archaeology Consultancy, 25 Main Street, South Rauceby, Sleaford NG34 8QG, UK. E-mail: . (JR)
Tessa Roper
Affiliation:
25 West Parade, Lincoln LN1 1NW, UK. E-mail: . (JY)
Jane Young
Affiliation:
25 West Parade, Lincoln LN1 1NW, UK. E-mail: . (JY)

Abstract

Excavations undertaken at Quarrington, near Sleaford, Lincolnshire, revealed part of an Early and Middle Saxon settlement with associated fields or enclosures. Several timber buildings were identified, both round and rectangular, and there was evidence of ferrous and non-ferrous metalworking at the site. Finds included a large and regionally significant pottery assemblage, showing that Quarrington had an extensive trading network and obtained pottery from Lincolnshire and Leicestershire in the Early Saxon period. Pottery from the Northamptonshire area dominated the assemblage in the Middle Saxon period, with a smaller component from Lincolnshire and a limited quantity from Ipswich. Spatial variations in the Saxon ceramic assemblage suggest that the focus of settlement shifted towards the west or north west in the Middle Saxon period.

Few rural sites of Early and Middle Saxon date have produced sufficient faunal material to permit an analysis of changes during the fifth to eighth centuries until now; the large bone assemblage from Quarrington indicates changes in diet and the husbandry of domestic animals through time, with sheep becoming more important as pig diminished. Alterations to the slaughter profiles of cattle and sheep were also evident and may indicate changes from subsistence to surplus production. An apparently isolated Neolithic cremation and a post-medieval stone building were also revealed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Addyman, P V 1964. ‘A Dark-Age settlement at Maxey, Northants’, Medieval Archaeol, 8, 2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon 1991. ‘Flixborough, Middle Saxon settlement’, in ‘Archaeology in Lincolnshire and South Humberside 1990’ (ed N Field), Lincolnshire Hist Archaeol, 26, 35–7Google Scholar
Attenburrow, W M 1794. Map of the Lordship of Quarrington in the County of Lincoln, New Sleaford, Holdingham and Quarrington Inclosure Award 1796, Lincolnshire Archives, Kesteven Award 67Google Scholar
Baart, J M, Krook, W, Langerweij, Ab C, Ockers, N, van Regteren Altena, H, Stam, T, Stoep-ker, H, Stouthart, G W and van der Zwan, M 1977. Opgravingen in Amsterdam, HaarlemGoogle Scholar
Bayley, J 1991. ‘Anglo-Saxon non-ferrous metal working: a survey’, World Archaeol, 23.1, 115–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, J 1993a. ‘Clay piece-moulds’, in The Gold, Silver and Other Non-Ferrous Alloy Objects from Hamwic (ed Hinton, D A), Southampton Finds Volume 2, 83–4, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Bayley, J 1993b. ‘Crucibles and cupels’, The Gold, Silver and Other Non-Ferrous Alloy Objects from Hamwic (ed Hinton, D A), Southampton Finds Volume 2, 86–8, SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
Brodribb, A C C, Hands, A R and Walker, D R 1971. Excavations at Shakenoak Farm, near Wilcote, Oxfordshire, pt 2, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Carr, R D 1985. ‘Brandon, Staunch Meadow, 1979–1984’, Fenland Res, 2, 3540Google Scholar
Clark, J (ed) 1995. The Medieval Horse and its Equipment, Medieval Finds Excav London, 5, LondonGoogle Scholar
Cool, H E M 1990. ‘Roman metal hairpins from southern Britain’, Archaeol J, 147, 148–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cool, H E M 1993. ‘Copper alloy bracelets’, in Caister-on-Sea. Excavations by Charles Green 1951–55 (eds Darling, M J and Gurney, D), E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 60, 81–4, DerehamGoogle Scholar
Courtney, T 1976. ‘Excavations at Melbourne, Derbyshire, 1973’, Derbyshire Archaeol J, 96, 62–9Google Scholar
Cowgill, J, Neergaard, M de and Griffiths, N 1987. Knives and Scabbards, Medieval Finds Excav London, 1, LondonGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, P J 1990. West Stow: Early Anglo-Saxon Animal Husbandry, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 47, IpswichGoogle Scholar
Dymond, M 1992. ‘Archaeological evaluation at Town Road, Quarrington’, unpublished Heritage Trust of Lincolnshire archive reportGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B M A 1995. ‘Spurs and spur fittings’, in The Medieval Horse and its Equipment, Medieval Finds Excav London, 5 (ed Clark, J), LondonGoogle Scholar
Elsdon, S M 1997. Old Sleaford Revealed, Nottingham Studies in Archaeology, 2, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Fernie, E C 1991. ‘Anglo-Saxon lengdis and the evidence of die buildings’, Medieval Archaeol, xxxv, 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, F N 1981. ‘Cherry Willingham’, in ‘Archaeology in Lincolnshire and South Humberside, 1980’ (ed A J White), Lincolnshire Hist Archaeol, 16, 70Google Scholar
Foster, C W and Longley, T 1976. The Lincolnshire Domesday and the Lindsey Survey, Lincoln Rec Soc, 19, GainsboroughGoogle Scholar
Gautier, A 1984. ‘How do I count you, let me count the ways? Problems of archaeozoological quantification’, in Animals and Archaeology 4: Husbandry in Europe (eds Grigson, C and Clutton-Brock, J), BAR Int Ser, 227, 237–52, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Geophysical Surveys of Bradford 1993. Report on Geophysical Survey: Quarrington, Report No. 93/45, BradfordGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A and Kinnes, I 1997. ‘On the urns of a dilemma: radiocarbon and the Peterborough problem’, Oxford J Archaeol, 16, 6572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, I H, Ellis, B and Oakley, G E 1979. ‘The iron objects’, in St Peter's Street, Northampton: Excavations 1973–1976 (ed Williams, J H), 268–77Google Scholar
Grant, A 1982. ‘The use of tooth wear as a guide to the age of domestic ungulates’, in Ageing and Sexing Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites (eds Wilson, B, Grigson, C and Payne, S), BAR Brit Ser, 109, 91108, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Habermehl, K-H 1961. Die Alterbestimmung bei Haustieren, Pelztieren und beim jagdbaren Wildtieren, Berlin and HamburgGoogle Scholar
Hart, C R 1966. The Early Charters of Eastern England, Welwyn Garden CityGoogle Scholar
Hills, C and Penn, K 1981. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham. Part II: Catalogue of Cremations, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 11, DerehamGoogle Scholar
Hills, C, Penn, K and Rickett, R 1984. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham. Part III: Catalogue of Inhumations, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 21, DerehamGoogle Scholar
Huggins, P J 1991. ‘Anglo-Saxon timber building measurements: recent results’, Medieval Archaeol, xxxv, 628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S, Marshall, A and Millett, M 1984. ‘An early medieval building tradition’, Archaeol J, 141, 182215Google Scholar
Lane, T 1994. ‘Hoe Hills, Dowsby’, Fenland Res, 9, 1619Google Scholar
MacGregor, A 19721974. ‘The Broch of Burrian, North Ronaldsay, Orkney’, Proc Soc Antiq Scotl, 105, 63118Google Scholar
MacGregor, A 1978. ‘Industry and commerce in Anglo-Scandinavian York’, in Viking Age York and the North (ed Hall, R H), CBA Res Rep, 27, 27–57, LondonGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, A 1985. Bone, Antler, Ivory and Horn. The Technology of Skeletal Materials since the Roman Period, LondonGoogle Scholar
Mackreth, D F 1996. Orton Hall Farm: A Roman and Early Anglo-Saxon Farmstead, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 76, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
Mahany, C and Roffe, D (eds) 1979. Sleaford, South Lincolnshire Archaeol, 3, Stamford and SleafordGoogle Scholar
Mann, J E 1982. Early Medieval Finds from Flaxengate. I: Objects of Antler, Bone, Stone, Horn, Ivory, Amber and Jet, Archaeol Lincoln, XIV/I, LondonGoogle Scholar
Manning, W H 1985. Catalogue of Roman-British Iron Tools, Fittings and Weapons in the British Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
Margeson, S 1993. Norwich Households: The Medieval and Post-medieval Finds from Norwich Survey Excavations 1971–1978, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 58, NorwichGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A and Marshall, G 1991. ‘A survey and analysis of the buildings of Early and Middle Anglo-Saxon England’, Medieval Archaeol, xxxv, 2943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, J G 1989. ‘Iron and its alloys in the fifth to eleventh centuries AD in England’, World Archaeol, 20.3, 373–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, M and James, S 1983. ‘Excavations at Cowdery's Down, Basingstoke, Hampshire, 1978–81’, Archaeol J, 140, 151279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, G E and Hall, A D 1979. ‘The spindle whorls’, in St Peter's Street, Northampton: Excavations 1973–1976 (ed Williams, J H), 286–9Google Scholar
O'Brien, C and Miket, R 1991. ‘The early medieval settlement at Thirlings, Northumberland’, Durham Archaeol J, 7, 5791Google Scholar
Pawley, S 1996. The Book of Sleaford, FromeGoogle Scholar
Pevsner, N and Harris, J 1989. Lincolnshire, The Buildings of England (2nd edn, rev Antram, N), LondonGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1983. ‘Faunal sample to subsistence economy: some problems in reconstruction’, in Integrating the Subsistence Economy (ed Jones, M), BAR Int Ser, 181, 251–78, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1986a. ‘Assessing the relative frequencies of species by the application of a stochastic model to a zooarchaeological database’, in Database Management and Zooarchaeology (ed van Wijngaarden-Bakker, L H), PACT, 14, 185–92, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1986b. ‘A comparison of methods of age determination from the mandibular dentition of an archaeological sample of cattle’, in Teeth and Anthropology (eds Cruwys, E and Foley, R A), BAR Int Ser, 291, 149–68, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1987. ‘Practicality and realism in archaeozoological analysis and interpretation’, in Pragmatic Archaeology Theory in Crisis? (eds Gaffney, C H and Gaffhey, V L), BAR Brit Ser, 167, 4770, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1994. Animal Bones, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J 1995. ‘Animal bones from post-Roman contexts’, in Excavations at York Minster. Vol 1: Prom Roman Fortress to Norman Cathedral (ed Carver, M O H), 533–88, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J with others 1996. ‘Beachview Birsay: the biological assemblage’, in Birsay Bay Project. Vol. 2: Sites in Birsay Village and on the Brough of Birsay, Orkney (ed Morris, C D), 161–92, DurhamGoogle Scholar
Rackham, D J and West, B 1995. ‘Mammal and bird remains’, in ‘Environment and economy in Anglo-Saxon London’ (ed D J Rackham), unpublished report by Greater London Environmental Archaeology SectionGoogle Scholar
Rickett, R 1995. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham. Part VII: The Iron Age, Roman and Early Saxon Settlement, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 73, DerehamGoogle Scholar
Roffe, D 1979. ‘Origins’, in Sleaford1, South Lincolnshire Archaeol, 3 (eds Mahany, C and Roffe, D), 1116, Stamford and SleafordGoogle Scholar
Rogers, N S H (ed) 1993. Anglian and Other Finds from Fishergate, The Archaeology of York, The Small Finds, 17/9, LondonGoogle Scholar
Scott, S 1994. ‘The animal bone’, pp 284–93 in ‘Excavation of a Saxon site at Riby Cross Roads, Lincolnshire’ (K Steedman), Archaeol J, 151, 212306Google Scholar
Silver, I A 1969. ‘The ageing of domestic animals’, Science in Archaeology (2nd edn, eds Brothwell, D and Higgs, E), 283302, LondonGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G W 1887. ‘On excavations in an Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Sleaford, in Lincolnshire’, Archaeologia, L, 383406Google Scholar
Trollop, E 1872. Sleaford and the Wapentakes of Flaxwell and Aswardun, in the County of Lincoln, London and SleafordGoogle Scholar
Trow-Smith, R 1957. A History of British Livestock Husbandry, LondonGoogle Scholar
Tylecote, R F 1986. The Prehistory of Metallurgy in the British Isles, 2nd edn, LondonGoogle Scholar
Vince, A and Young, J 1991. ‘East Midlands Anglo-Saxon Pottery Project’, in Lincoln Archaeology 3 (ed Jones, M J), 38–9, LincolnGoogle Scholar
Von den Driesch, A 1976. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum Bulletin, 1, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Walker, F and Lane, T 1996. ‘An Early and Middle Saxon settlement at Quarrington, Lincolnshire’, unpublished APS Report No. 49/96Google Scholar
Walton-Rogers, P 1993. ‘Spindle whorls’, in Anglian and Other Finds from Fishergate, The Archaeology of York, The Small Finds (ed Rogers, N S H), 17/9, LondonGoogle Scholar
Watson, J P N 1979. ‘The estimation of the relative frequency of mammalian species: Khirokitia 1972’, J Archaeol Sci, 6, 127–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, S 1985. West Stow. The Anglo-Saxon Village, E Anglian Archaeol Rep, 24, IpswichGoogle Scholar
Whitwell, B 1991. ‘Flixborough’, Curr Archaeol, 126, 244–7Google Scholar
Williams, J H (ed) 1979. St Peter's Street, Northampton: Excavations 1973–1976, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
Young, J unpublished. ‘The post-Roman pottery from Newark Castle’, archive reportGoogle Scholar
Young, J and Vince, A in preparation. Contribution to Flixborough report (Oxbow Books, forthcoming)Google Scholar