Article contents
Early Anglo-Saxon artefacts from Hod Hill Dorset
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 April 2011
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0003581500071717/resource/name/firstPage-S0003581500071717a.jpg)
- Type
- Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1993
References
Åberg, N. 1926. The Anglo-Saxons in England during the Early Centuries after the Invasion, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
Acer, B. 1990. ‘The alternative quoit brooch: an update’ in Anglo-Saxon cemeteries: a reappraisal (ed. Southworth, E.), proceedings of a conference held at Liverpool Museum 1986, 153–61, StroudGoogle Scholar
Aldsworth, F. R. 1978. ‘The Droxford Anglo-Saxon cemetery, Soberton, Hampshire’, Proc. Hampshire F. Club Archaeol. Soc, 35, 93–182Google Scholar
Avent, R. and Evision, V. I. 1982. ‘Anglo-Saxon button brooches’, Archaeologia, 107, 77–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, M. 1972. ‘Winchester: the development of an early capital’, in Vor-und Frühformen der europäischen Stadt im Mittelalter (eds. Jankhun, H., Schlesinger, W. and Steur, H.), Bericht über ein Symposium in Reinhausen bei Göttingen vom 18. bis 24. April 1972, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Güttingen, Teil I, 229–61, GüttingenGoogle Scholar
BÜhme, H. W. 1974. Germanische Grabfunde des 4. bis 5. Jahrhunderts zwischen unterer Elbe und Loire, MunichGoogle Scholar
BÜhme, H. W. 1986. ‘Das Ende der Rümerherrschaft in Britannien und die angelsächsische Besiedlung Englands im 5. Jahrhundert’ in Jahrbuch des Rümisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 33, 469–574Google Scholar
Bowen, H. C. 1990. The archaeology of Bokerley Dyke (ed. Eagles, B. N.), RCHM(E), LondonGoogle Scholar
Brailsford, J. W. 1962. Hod Hill. Volume I; Antiquities from Hod Hill in the Burden collection, LondonGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B. W. 1976. Excavations at Portchester Castle. II. Saxon, Soc. Antiq. London Res. Rep., 33, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, S. M. 1984. ‘The excavation of an Anglo-Saxon cemetery (and some prehistoric pits) at Charlton Plantation, near Downton’, Wiltshire Archaeol. Natur. Hist. Mag., 79, 109–54Google Scholar
Eagles, B. N. 1979. The Anglo-Saxon settlement of Humberside, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser., 68, 2 vols., OxfordGoogle Scholar
Eagles, B. N., forthcoming. ‘The archaeological evidence for settlement in the fifth to seventh centuries AD’ in Medieval Rural Settlement in Wessex (ed. M. Aston and C. Lewis)Google Scholar
Evision, V. I., 1977. ‘Supporting-arm and equal-arm brooches in England’, Studien zur Sachsenforschung, 127–47, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
Evision, V. I., 1988. An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Alton, Hampshire, Hampshire F. Club Archaeol. Soc. Monograph 4Google Scholar
Field, N. H. 1992. Dorset and the Second Legion. New light on a Roman campaign, TivertonGoogle Scholar
Gelling, M. 1988. Signposts to the Past. Place-names and the History of England, second edition, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Gincell, C. J. 1975/1976. ‘The excavation of an early Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Collingbourne Ducis’, Wiltshire Archaeol. Natur. Hist. Mag., 70/71, 61–98Google Scholar
Hawkes, S. C. 1981. ‘Cruciform brooches from the Union House’ and ‘The bronze objects’ in Colchester Archaeol. Rep., Council for British Archaeology, 1, 9–11Google Scholar
Hawkes, S. C., 1986. ‘The early Saxon period’ in The Archaeology of the Oxford Region (eds. Briggs, G., Cook, J. and Rowley, T.), 64–114, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hawkes, S. C., 1989. ‘The south-east after the Romans: the Saxon settlement’, in The Saxon Shore. A Handbook (ed. Maxfield, V. A.), Exeter Studies in History, 25 (produced for 15th International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies), CanterburyGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, S. C., Keene, S., Barker, H., Bimson, M., Oddy, W. A. and Werner, A. E. A. 1990. ‘Jewellery’, in Object and Economy in Medieval Winchester (M. Biddle), Winchester Studies 7, 2 vols., 11, 621–32, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Hills, C., Penn, K. and Rickett, R. 1984. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, part III, East Anglian Archaeology, 21Google Scholar
Jarvis, K. S. 1983. Excavations in Christchurch 1969–1980, Dorset Natur. Hist. Archaeol. Soc. Monograph Series, 5Google Scholar
McCulloch, P. C. 1992. ‘Itchen Abbas Anglo-Saxon cemetery—major discoveries’, Winchester Museums Service Newsletter, 12, 6–7Google Scholar
Meaney, A. L. and Hawkes, S. C. 1970. Two Anglo-Saxon cemeteries at Winnall, Winchester, Hampshire, Soc. Medieval Archaeol. Monograph, 4Google Scholar
Mortimer, C. 1990. Some Aspects of Early Medieval Copper-alloy Technology, as Illustrated by a Study of the Anglian Cruciform Brooch, unpubl. D. Phil, thesis, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Musty, J. and Stratton, J. E. D. 1964. ‘A Saxon cemetery at Winterbourne Gunner, near Salisbury’, Wiltshire Archaeol. Natur. Hist. Mag., 59, 86–109Google Scholar
Pitt Rivers, A. 1898. Excavations in Cranborne Chase near Rushmore on the borders of Dorset and Wiltshire 1893–1896, iv, LondonGoogle Scholar
Rahtz, P. A., Woodward, A., Burrow, I., Everton, A., Watts, L., Leach, P., Hirst, S., Fowler, P. and Gardner, K. 1992. Cadbury Congresbury 1968–73. A Late/Post-Roman Hilltop Settlement in Somerset, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser., 223, OxfordGoogle Scholar
RCHM. 1970. An Inventory of Historical Monuments in the County of Dorset. Volume Three. Central Dorset, LondonGoogle Scholar
Swanton, M.J. 1973. The Spearheads of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements, Roy. Archaeol. Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
Swanton, M.J., 1974. A Corpus of Pagan Anglo-Saxon Spear-Types, Brit. Archaeol. Rep. Brit. Ser., 7, OxfordGoogle Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (ed.) 1978. Gildas. The Ruin of Britain and other works, History from the Sources (general editor: Morris, J.), ChichesterGoogle Scholar
Youngs, S. M. et al. 1985. ‘Medieval Britain and Ireland in 1984’, Medieval Archaeol., 29, 158–230Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by