Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T02:26:30.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeology's awkward allies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2020

Pieterjan Deckers*
Affiliation:
Centre for Urban Network Evolutions, Aarhus University, Denmark (✉ pdeckers@cas.au.dk)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, S. & Thomas, S. (ed.). 2013. Portable Antiquities: archaeology, collecting, metal detecting. Internet Archaeology 33 (thematic issue).Google Scholar
Deckers, P. 2019. Archaeological metal detecting by amateurs in Flanders: legislation, policy and practice of a hobby, in Campbell, S., White, L. & Thomas, S. (ed.) Competing values in archaeological heritage: 103–23. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94102-8_8Google Scholar
Deckers, P., Lewis, M. & Thomas, S., S. (ed.). 2016. Aspects of non-professional metal detecting in Europe. Open Archaeology 2 (thematic issue).Google Scholar
Delestre, X. 2019. Le détectorisme en France: quelle situation et quelle politique publique? Canadian Journal of Bioethics 2: 158–65. https://doi.org/10.7202/1066474arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobat, A.S., Deckers, P., Heeren, S., Lewis, M., Thomas, S. & Wessman, A.. 2020. Towards a cooperative approach to hobby metal detecting: the European Public Finds Recording Network (EPFRN) vision statement. European Journal of Archaeology 23(2): 121. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2020.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, D.W.J. 2010. The Portable Antiquities Scheme and the Treasure Act: protecting the archaeology of England and Wales? Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 20: 111. https://doi.org/10.5334/pia.333Google Scholar
Hardy, S.A. 2018. Metal-detecting for cultural objects until ‘there is nothing left’: the potential and limits of digital data, netnographic data and market data for open-source analysis. Arts 7(3): 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7030040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, C. 2013. Vom rechten Umgang mit Sondengängern: das ‘Portable Antiquities Scheme’ in England und Wales und seine Folgen. Archäologische Informationen 36: 129137. https://doi.org/10.11588/ai.2013.0.15327Google Scholar
Karl, R. & Möller, K.. 2016. Empirische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses der Anzahl von MetallsucherInnen im deutsch-britischen Vergleich. Oder: wie wenig Einfluss die Gesetzeslage hat. Archäologische Informationen 39: 215–26.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J.M. 2014. Securing cultural heritage and fencing stolen goods? A case study on museums and metal detecting in Norway. Norwegian Archaeological Review 47: 83107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.899616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed. 2016. Vrijwilligers in de Archeologie en de Erfgoedwet. Amersfoort: RCE.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Temiño, I., Yates, D., Deckers, P., Tantalean, H., Ulst, I., Sanchez Nava, P.F. & Musteata, S.. 2013. Forum: the looting of archaeological heritage (Part I—beyond metal detectors: around the plundering of archaeological heritage). AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology 3: 545.Google Scholar
Scherzler, D. & Siegmund, F.. 2016. Tübingen theses on archaeology. Archäologische Informationen 39: 618.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. 2016. The future of studying hobbyist metal detecting in Europe: a call for a transnational approach. Open Archaeology 2: 140–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2016-0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. & Pitblado, B.L.. 2020. The dangers of conflating responsible and responsive artefact stewardship with illicit and illegal collecting. Antiquity 94: 10601067. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2019.201CrossRefGoogle Scholar