Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T03:24:42.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeology and the Transmission of Ideas*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Extract

This lecture was written on shipboard in an untidy sea, and, if its matter and its T sentiment pitch and toss a trifle, you may properly expect me, as an archaeologist, to blame environment. I belong in fact to a generation of students who have learned to make something of a fetish of environment, even at the expense of forgetting occasionally the extent to which we are the authors of that same environment. It is not difficult to think of examples where mankind has created a desert and called it civilization; and when in the long run the desert wins, as is its habit, we once again short-circuit logic and arraign environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In ANTIQUITY XXIV (1950), 126, where I have discussed the question of values at greater length.

2 At Fathpur Sikri. See E. W. Smith, The Moghul Architecture of Fathpur Sikri (Allahabad, 1894), and M. A. Husain, A Guide to Fatehpur Sikri (Delhi, 1937).

3 Unless we except the momentary transfer of Arretine rouletting to a certain class of native ware.