Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T07:28:58.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psycholinguistic evidence for split intransitivity in Spanish second language acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2004

SILVINA MONTRUL
SILVINA MONTRUL
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates the acquisition and on-line processing of unaccusative and unergative verbs in second language (L2) Spanish by English-speaking learners. It asks whether L2 learners make a syntactic distinction between the two verb classes and whether there is an effect of semantic subclass, in accordance with a semantic hierarchy. Participants were 35 native Spanish speakers and 44 English-speaking learners of Spanish ranging from intermediate to advanced proficiency. The main task was an on-line visual probe recognition task. Subjects read sentences on a computer screen and had to decide whether a word had appeared in the sentence. The results of this study showed that native speakers who scan their syntactic representations to find a word contained in a complex subject noun phrase recognized the word faster with unaccusative-verb sentences than with unergative-verb sentences, suggesting that the syntactic presence of a trace in unaccusative-verb sentences facilitates comprehension. The L2 learners showed a similar response pattern, confirming that they differentiated between the two classes of verbs. Analyses of reaction times by verb class indicated that not all of the verbs in each class were responded to consistently: some subclasses induced shorter reaction times than others.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 239 - 267
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alameda J., & Cuetos F. 1995 Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano. Oviedo, Spain: Universidad de Oviedo, Departamento de Psicología.
Aranovich R. 2000 Spanish inchoatives and the semantics of split intransitivity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.
Baker M. (in press). Nouns, verbs and adjectives. Their universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balcom P. 1997 Why is this happened? Passive morphology and unaccusativity. Second Language Research, 13, 1– 9.Google Scholar
Bard E., Robertson D., & Sorace A. 1996 Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72, 32– 68.Google Scholar
Bever T. 1970 The cognitive basis of linguistic structures. In R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development (pp. 279– 362). New York: Wiley.
Bever T. & McElree B. 1988 Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35– 43.Google Scholar
Bever T. & Sanz M. 1997 Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension: Unaccusatives in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 69– 91.Google Scholar
Bever T., Straub K., Shenkman K., Kim J., & Carrithers C. 1989 The psychological reality of NP-trace. Talk given at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Birdsong D. 1989 Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer–Verlag.
Bley–Vroman R., & Masterson D. 1989 Reaction time as a supplement to grammaticality judgments in the investigation of second language learners' competence. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 8, 207– 237.Google Scholar
Borer H., & Wexler K. 1987 The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parametter setting (pp. 123– 172). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Burzio L. 1986 Italian syntax: A government and binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Bybee J. 2002 Phonological evidence for exemplar storage in multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 215– 222.Google Scholar
Carrier J., & Randall J. 1992 The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 173– 234.Google Scholar
Chomsky N. 1995 The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Contreras H. 1978 El orden de las palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.
Coopmans P. 1989 Where stylistic and syntactic processes meet: Locative inversion in English. Language, 65, 728– 751.Google Scholar
de Miguel E. 1992 El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: Perfectividad e imperfectividad. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Demonte V. 1985 Papeles temáticos y sujetos sintácticos en el sintagma nominal. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 9–10, 265– 331.Google Scholar
Dowty D. 1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547– 619.Google Scholar
Duffield N., & White L. 1999 Assessing L2 knowledge of L2 clitic placement. Second Language Research, 15, 133– 160.Google Scholar
Duffield N., White L., Bruhn de Garavito J., Montrul S., & Prévost P. 2002 Clitic placement in L2 French: Evidence from sentence matching. Journal of Linguistics, 38, 487– 525.Google Scholar
Dussias P. 2003 Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners: Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 559– 582.Google Scholar
Ellis N. 2002 Frequency effects in language processing: A review for implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143– 188.Google Scholar
Eubank L. 1993 Sentence matching and processing in L2 development. Second Language Research, 12, 73– 106.Google Scholar
Felser C., Nakano Y., & Clahsen H. (in press). Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
Felser C., Roberts L., Gross R., & Marinis T. 2002 The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 40, 1– 38.Google Scholar
Fernández E. 1999 Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars. A generative approach (pp. 217– 240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fodor J. 1989 Empty categories in sentence processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 155– 209.Google Scholar
Fodor J. 1999 Learnability theory: Triggers for parsing with. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 363– 406). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Garnsey S., Pearlmutter N., Myers E., & Lotocky M. 1997 The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 58– 93.Google Scholar
Gibson E., & Schütze C. 1999 Disambiguation preferences in noun phrase conjunction do not mirror corpus frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 263– 279.Google Scholar
Gregg K. 2003 The state of emergentism in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 19, 95– 128.Google Scholar
Hirakawa M. 1995 L2 acquisition of English unaccusative constructions. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 291– 302). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hirakawa M. 2000 Unaccusativity in second language Japanese and English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Hirakawa M. 2001 L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 221– 246.Google Scholar
Juffs A. 1998a Main verb vs. reduced relative clause ambiguity resolution in second language sentence processing. Language Learning, 48, 107– 147.Google Scholar
Juffs A. 1998b Some effects of first language argument structure and syntax on second language processing. Second Language Research, 14, 406– 424.Google Scholar
Juffs A. 1998c The acquisition of semantics–syntax correspondences and verb frequencies in ESL materials. Language Teaching Research, 2, 93– 123.Google Scholar
Juffs A. 2001 Psycholinguistically oriented second language research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21, 207– 220.Google Scholar
Juffs A., & Harrington M. 1995 Parsing effects in L2 sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483– 516.Google Scholar
Juffs A., & Harrington M. 1996 Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence processing research. Language Learning, 46, 286– 324.Google Scholar
Just M. A., Carpenter P. A., & Woolley J. D. 1982 Paradigms and processes and in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 228– 238.Google Scholar
Kageyama T. 1996 Doushi-imiron [Verb semantics]. Tokyo: Kuroshio.
Kellerman E. 1978 Giving learners a break: Native language intuitions as a source of predictions about transferability. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 15, 49– 58.Google Scholar
Klein E. 1999 Just parsing through. In E. C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (pp. 197– 216). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Legendre G. 1989 Unaccusativity in French. Lingua, 79, 95– 164.Google Scholar
Levin B., & Rappaport Hovav M. 1995 Unaccusativity at the syntax semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin B., & Rappaport Hovav M. 1998 Building verb meaning. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments. Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97– 134). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Levin B., & Rappaport Hovav M. 2002 An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 77, 766– 797.Google Scholar
Levin B., & Rappaport Hovav M. (in press). From lexical semantics to argument realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacWhinney B. 1987 The competition model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249– 308). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Marinis T. 2003 Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 19, 144– 161.Google Scholar
Montrul S. 1999 Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 15, 191– 219.Google Scholar
Montrul S. (in press). On knowledge and development of unaccusativity in Spanish L2 acquisition. Linguistics.
Newmeyer F. 1998 Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oshita H. 2001 The unaccusative trap hypothesis in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 279– 304.Google Scholar
Perlmutter D. 1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 157– 189). Berkeley Linguistic Society, University of California, Berkeley.
Rappaport Hovav M., & Levin B. 1998 Building verb meaning. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments. Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 135– 164). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Ritter E., & Rosen S. 1998 Delimiting events in syntax. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 135– 164). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Rosen C. 1984 The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations. In D. Perlmutter & C. Rosen (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 2 (pp. 38– 77). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosen S. 1996 Events and verb classification. Linguistics, 34, 191– 223.Google Scholar
Sanz M. 2000 Events and predication. A new approach to syntactic processing in English and Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sanz M., & Bever T. 2001 A theory of syntactic processing in the bilingual. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages (pp. 134– 158). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schütze C. 1996 The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Snyder W., Hyams N., & Crisma P. 1995 Romance auxiliary selection with reflexive clitics: Evidence for early knowledge of unaccusativity. In E. Clark (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Child Language Research Forum (pp. 127– 136). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Sorace A. 1993a Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in native and non-native Italian grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22– 47.Google Scholar
Sorace A. 1993b Unaccusativity and auxiliary choice in non-native grammars of Italian and French: Asymmetries and predictable indeterminacy. Journal of French Language Studies, 3, 71– 93.Google Scholar
Sorace A. 1995 Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second language: The unaccusative/unergative distinction. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 153– 175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sorace A. 1996 The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research. In C. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 375– 412). New York: Academic Press.
Sorace A. 2000 Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language, 76, 859– 890.Google Scholar
Sorace A., & Shomura Y. 2001 Lexical constraints on the acquisition of split intransitivity: evidence from L2 Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 2.Google Scholar
Suñer M. 1982 Syntax and semantics of presentational sentence types. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Torrego E. 1989 Unergative–unaccusative alternations in Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 253– 269.Google Scholar
Townsend D., & Bever T. 2001 Sentence comprehension. The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
van Hout A. 1996 Event semantics and verb frame alternations: A case study of Dutch and its acquisition (Tilburg Dissertations in Language Studies). Tilburg, The Netherlands: University of Tilburg.
van Hout A., Randall J., & Weissenborn J. 1992 Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction. In M. Verrips & F. Wijnen (Eds.), The acquisition of Dutch. (Amsterdam Series in Child Language Development 1, pp. 79–120). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
VanPatten B. 1996 Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Van Valin R. 1990 Semantic parameters of split intransitivity. Language, 66, 221– 260.Google Scholar
Vendler Z. 1967 Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 56, 143– 160.Google Scholar
White L., & Juffs A. 1998 Constraints on wh- movement in two different contexts of non-native language acquisition: Competence and processing. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O'Neill (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 111– 119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yip V. 1995 Interlanguage and learnability. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Yuan B. 1999 Acquiring the unaccusative/unergative distinction in a second language: Evidence from English-speaking learners of Chinese. Linguistics, 37, 275– 296.Google Scholar
Zaenen A. 1993 Unaccusativity in Dutch: Integrating syntax and lexical semantics. In J. Pustejovsky (Ed.), Semantics and the lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Zobl H. 1989 Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 203– 221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.