Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:29:37.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibitory effect of positional syllable frequency in Spanish 2nd and 4th grade readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

J. L. Luque ,
C. J. Álvarez ,
S. Bordoy ,
A. Giménez ,
P. J. López-Pérez  and
M. López-Zamora Open the ORCID record for M. López-Zamora [Opens in a new window]
J. L. Luque
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
C. J. Álvarez
Affiliation:
Universidad de La Laguna, Spain
S. Bordoy
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
A. Giménez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
P. J. López-Pérez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
M. López-Zamora*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Málaga, Spain
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: miguel.lopez@uma.es.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The inhibitory effect of positional syllable frequency is a well-known phenomenon in visual word recognition: words with high-frequency syllables require extra time for deactivating the lexical syllabic neighbors. The inhibitory effect implies that a connection exists between graphemes, phonemes, the first syllable, and the phonological lexicon. However, experimental results of the first developmental stages of occurrence are scarce and inconclusive. A second- and fourth-grade sample of typical school readers participated in a lexical decision task containing high/low frequency words and high/low syllable frequency words. Our primary hypothesis was that the inhibitory effect would be found on both school grade groups. We did not predict significant differences in magnitude of effect between second- and fourth-grade participants. A general inhibitory effect was found, and separate analyses by school grade groups also indicated significant inhibitory effects. Furthermore, second- and fourth-grade children showed small sizes of the inhibitory effect, resembling the sizes found in adult normal readers. Our results suggest that Spanish readers reach a functional connection between syllables and words at an early stage. The straightforward theoretical implication is that the inhibitory effect relies heavily on the structural properties of the lexical access system that are acquired at an early age.

Keywords

lexical accessliteracypositional syllable frequencysyllable frequency
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 1 - 17
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & de Vega, M. (2000). Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition: Evidence of sequential-type processing. Psicológica, 21, 341–374.Google Scholar
Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 427–452. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, C. J., Carreiras, M., & Taft, M. (2001). Syllables and morphemes: Contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 545–555. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2545 Google ScholarPubMed
Álvarez, C. J., de Vega, M., & Carreiras, M. (1998). La sílaba como unidad de activación léxica en la lectura de palabras trisílabas. Psicothema, 10, 371–386.Google Scholar
Álvarez, C. J., García-Saavedra, G., Luque, J. L., & Taft, M. (2017). Syllabic parsing in children: A developmental study using visual word-spotting in Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 15, 1–22. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000040 Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27–30Google Scholar
Bates, D., & Maechler, M. (2009) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375–31.Google Scholar
Bordoy, S. (2015). De la teoría fonológica a la identificación temprana y el diagnóstico diferencial de la dislexia evolutiva. Universidad de Málaga, Publications and Scientific Dissemination Service.Google Scholar
Caravolas, M., & Landerl, K. (2010). The influences of syllable structure and reading ability on the development of phoneme awareness: A longitudinal, cross-linguistic study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 464–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., & de Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, M. S. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing, 6, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2008). Activation of syllable units during visual recognition of French words in Grade 2. Journal of Child Language, 35, 883–894.Google Scholar
Chetail, F., & Mathey, S. (2009). The syllable frequency effect in visual recognition of French words: A study in skilled and beginning readers. Reading and Writing, 22, 955–973. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9135-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colé, P., Magnan, A., & Grainger, J. (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, M., Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 35, 974–983. doi: 10.3758/BF03193470 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conrad, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable-frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuadro, A., Costa, D., Trias, D., & Ponce de León, P. (2008). Evaluación del nivel lector: Manual técnico del Test de Eficacia Lectora de J. Marın y M. Carrillo [Assessment of reading ability: Technical manual of the Reading Ability Test]. Uruguay: Prensa Médica Latinoamericana.Google Scholar
Davis, C. J., & Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doignon-Camus, N., & Zagar, D. (2014). The syllabic bridge: The first step in learning spelling-to-sound correspondences. Journal of Child Language, 41, 1147–1165. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000305 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goikoetxea, E. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in preliterate and literate Spanish-speaking children. Reading and Writing, 18, 51–79. doi: 10.1007/s11145-004-1955-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 75, 800–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM–P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. M. (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147–187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jasp, Team (2019). JASP (Version 0.11.1)[Computer software]. JASP Team: Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. E., García, E., O’Shanahan, I., & Rojas, E. (2010). Do Spanish children use the syllable in visual word recognition in learning to read? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiménez, J. E., Guzmán, R., & Artiles, C. (1997). Efectos de la frecuencia silábica posicional en el aprendizaje de la lectura. Cognitiva, 1, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. E., & Hernández, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. E., & Rodrigo, M. (1994). Is it true that the differences in reading performance between students with and without LD cannot be explained by IQ? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 155–163.Google Scholar
López-Zamora, M., Luque, J. L., Álvarez, C. J., & Cobos, P. L. (2012). Individual differences in categorical perception are related to sublexical/phonological processing in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 443–456. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.588763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luque, J. L., López-Zamora, M., Álvarez, C. J., & Bordoy, S. (2013). Beyond decoding deficit: Inhibitory effect of positional syllable frequency in dyslexic Spanish children. Annals of Dyslexia, 63, 239–252. doi: 10.1007/s11881-013-0082-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maïonchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., & Écalle, J. (2010a). Syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Developmental approach in French children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2009.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maïonchi-Pino, N., Magnan, A., & Écalle, J. (2010b). The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: Evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features’ role in silent reading and speech discrimination. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 123–150. doi: 10.1007/s11881-010-0036-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marín, J., & Carrillo, M. S. (1999). Test Colectivo de Eficacia Lectora (TECLE). In Cuadro, A., Costa, D., Trias, D., & Ponce de León, P. (Eds.), Evaluación del nivel lector. Manual técnico del test de Eficacia Lectora (pp. 247–248). Montevideo, Uruguay: Prensa Médica Latinoamericana.Google Scholar
Mathey, S., & Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain and Cognition, 8, 107–121.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Content, A., Cary, L., Mehler, J., & Segui, J. (1989). Syllabic segmentation and literacy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quilis, A. (1993). Tratado de fonología y fonética españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1996). Test de Matrices Progresivas de Raven. TEA: Ediciones S. A.–EspañaGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 291–298 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular reading system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33. doi: 10.1017/S0142716400010122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed