Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T09:54:55.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns in verb use by preschoolers with normal language and specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Donna J. Kelly
Donna J. Kelly*
Affiliation:
Marquette University
*
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preschoolers with specific language impairment (SLI) and two groups of children developing language normally (age-equivalent and MLU-equivalent) described motion and change-ofstate scenes while viewing a video program in a controlled experimental setting.Patterns of verb use were then analyzed across the three groups of children. Two findings were of particular interest. First, while the children with SLI relied heavily on the use of general all-purpose (GAP) verbs while describing the video scenes, the normally developing children produced an even higher percentage of CAP verbs. Second, the children with SLI made significantly more semantic errors in verb use. Unlike the normally developing children, the children with SLI were much more likely to produce a change-of-state verb. Hence, they produced cross-domain errors for motion-eliciting scenes (e.g., a moving figure was said to be “cracking” or “changing color”) and within-domain errors for change-of-state-eliciting scenes (e.g., a figure changing shape was said to be “changing to green”).

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 199 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, G. (1952). The Arthur Adaptation of the Letter International Performance Scale.Chicago: Stoeling.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrend, D. (1990). The development of verb concepts: Children's use of verbs to label familiar and novel events. Child Development, 61, 681–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrend, D. (1994). Processes involved in the initial mapping of verb meanings. In Tomasello, M. & Merriman, W. (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children's acquisition of verbs (pp. 251–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1989). Learning a semantic system: What role do cognitive predispositions play? In Rice, M. & Schiefelbusch, R. (Eds.), The teachability of language (pp. 113–170).Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Burgemeister, B., Blum, L., & Lorge, I. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity (3rd ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ceci, S. (1983). Automatic and purposive semantic processing characteristics of normal and language/learning disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 19, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., & Peters, J. (1984). Characterizing language impairment in children: An exploratory study. Language Testing, 1, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1978). On relational meaning: The acquisition of verb meaning. Child Development, 49, 988–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Goldberg, R. (1991). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language, 18, 115–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirsh-Pasek, P., Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H., Golinkoff, R., & Naigles, L. (1988, October). Syntactic bootstrapping: Evidence from comprehension.Paper presented at the Boston Language Conference.Google Scholar
Hoff-Ginsberg, E., Kelly, D., & Buhr, J. (1996). Syntactic bootstrapping by children with specific language impairment: Implications for a theory of specific language impairment. In Stringfellow, A. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 20 (pp. 328–339). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. (1983). Emergence of action categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J. (1991). Questions about cognition in children with specific language impairment.In Miller, J. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 299–308). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (1994). Cognitive abilities of language impaired children. In Watkins, R. V. & Rice, M. L. (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (pp. 107–122). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Johnston, J., & Ellis, Weismer S. (1983). Mental rotation abilities in language-disordered children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, J., & Smith, L. (1989). Dimensional thinking in language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32,33–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R. (1994). A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, R., & Leonard, L. (1986).Word-finding abilities in children with specific language impairment. (Monographs of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association No. 25). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., & Rice, M. (1994). Preferences for verb interpretation in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, T., & Fitzgerald, M. D. (1985). The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 12, 251–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klee, T., Schaffer, M., May, S., Membrino, L., & Mougey, K. (1989). A comparison of the age-MLU relation in normal and specifically language-impaired preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 226–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1991). Research on language disorders in children: A progress report. In Miller, J. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 3–22). Austin, TX:Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language,17, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L., Gleitman, L.,& Gleitman, H. (1993). Children acquire word meaning components from syntactic evidence. In Dromi, E. (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 104–140). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rice, M. (1991). Children with specific language impairment: Toward a model of teachability.In Krasnegor, N. A., Rumbaugh, D. M., Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 447–480).Hillsdale, NJ:Eribaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M., & Bode, J. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language, 13, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savich, P. (1984). Anticipatory imagery ability in normal and language-disabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 119–127.Google ScholarPubMed
Scarborough, H. (1990). Index of Productive Syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P., Stark, R., & Mellits, E. (1985). Identification of language-impaired children on the basis of rapid perception and production skills. Brain and Language, 25, 314–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terman, L.,& Merrill, M. (1973). Manual for the third revision (Form L-M) of the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. New York:Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K. J. (1994). Canonical linking rules: Forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children. Cognition, 51, 29–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, R., Kelly, D., Habers, H., & Hollis, W. (1995). Measuring children's lexical diversity: Differentiating typical and impaired language learners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1349–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, R., Rice, M., & Moltz, C. (1993). Verb use by language-impaired and normally developing children. First Language, 13, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar