No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
IX.—The Vanished Memorials of St. Thomas of Canterbury
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2012
Extract
If any Fellows of our Society have lately perused the copious literature on those Memorials of St. Thomas which were long the glories of Christ Church, the cathedral church of Canterbury, and vanished in 1538, I would ask them to compare their experience of the result with mine. I rose from the perusal with a hazy vision of those objects and of the transactions concerning them, such haziness arising from the confused manner in which the notices of them were treated, the neglect to seek for definite meanings of terms, the clinging to sham tradition as if it were real history. In such cases the proper remedy is that which is now being applied to the general history of our country, namely, to rebuild the story out of affirmative evidence arranged in order of date and construed in harmony with known events and practices. I propose to apply that remedy here.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1892
References
page 212 note a There were always two.
page 212 note b De Vert, , Les Cérémonies de l'Éiglise, Second edition (1710), ii. 471Google Scholar.
page 213 note a Westlake, , Design in Painted Glass (1881), i. 116Google Scholar.
page 213 note b De oblationibus
page 214 note a Domino Legato vicesimam de corona. 
.
For this reference and for much other, aid in this paper, I have to thank Mr. W. H. St. John Hope.
page 214 note b These preliminary acts are recorded in the three Chronicles of the Translation which are printed; one in French, in Stanley's Canterbury (1855), p. 207; one in Latin (Rolls Series, No. 67). Vol. IV. (1879), p. 426; and one in Icelandic and English (Rolls Series, No. 65), Vol. II. (1883), pp. cliii. 197.
page 215 note a 1221. De Corona, que expensa sunt in feretro lxxj x
1222. De Corona, que expenduntur in feretro xc x
page 215 note b Palæographical Society, Facsimiles of Ancient MSS. Second Series, part vii. pl. 137.
page 215 note c Ad feretrnm sancte Thome Martiris in eadem ecclesia unum firmaculum auri. s.
Ad idem feretrum in denariis vij
Ad caput ejusdem sancti vij
Ad punctum gladii quo idem sanctus suum subiit martirium vij
Ad clamidem ejusdem sancti vij
Ad tumbam ejusdem in volta vij
Exch. Qu. Rem. Wardr. Accts. 
in P. R. O.
page 216 note a Extracts printed in Archaeologia Cantiana, xiii. 518Google Scholar.
page 217 note a Parker MS. ccccxvii.
page 217 note b Wharton MS. 585, ff. 79, 85.
page 217 note c Dictionary of National Biography, “Colet.”
page 217 note a “Subimus cryptoporticum. Ea habet suos mystagogos. Illic primum exhibetur calvaria martyris perforata, reliqua tecta sunt argento, summa cranii pars nuda patet osculo.”
page 218 note a “Ab his igitur deducinmr ad superiora. Nam, post altare summum, rursus velut in novum templum ascenditur. Illic in sacello quodam ostenditur tota facies optimi viri inatirata, multisque gemmis insignita.”
page 218 note b State Papers, Hen. VIII. (1830), i. 580
page 219 note a State Papers, Hen. VIII. (1830), i. 583.
page 219 note b Wilkins's, Concilia, iii. 840Google Scholar.
page 219 note c Burnet's, Reformation, ed. 1865, iv. 345Google Scholar.
page 220 note a Burnet's, Reformation, vi. 221Google Scholar.
page 220 note b Ibid. xi. 224.
page 220 note c Ann. Eccl. Raynaldi contin. Baronii (1755), xiii. 494Google Scholar.
page 220 note d Bull. Rom (1727), i. 711Google Scholar.
page 222 note a This passage is thus lined out in the original MS. and therefore not printed by Collier.
page 222 note b Printed in 1774 and 1861. See ed. 1774, pp. 17, 51, 57.
page 222 note c Acts of Pr. C. 1545.
page 222 note d Wood's, Ath. Oxon. (1813) i. 218, noteGoogle Scholar.
page 224 note a Camden Society, Three Fifteenth Century Chronicles (1880), xxvijGoogle Scholar.
page 226 note a Brit. Mus., Harl. MS. 6253, f. 107. Lamb. MS. 827.
page 226 note b Brit. Mus., Sloane MS. 828; Harl. MS. 1302; and Lamb. MS. 179.