Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T15:22:53.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XXIV.—On the Identification of the Roman Portus Lemanis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2012

Get access

Extract

On the 23rd of November last, I took occasion, in the course of some remarks on Dr. Thurnam's paper on the Wiltshire Long Barrows, to mention the titles of some papers which I had in my mind to communicate to this Society in the course of the present session; one of them was, “On the Roman Ports in Kent and Sussex.” Immediately afterward I was surprised by a discourse, pronounced in your hearing, by Mr. Lewin, who undertook to identify Hythe with the “Portus Lemanis.” My own views of the subject being quite at variance with the theory of that learned gentleman, I would have delivered myself, on the spot, of the sentiments which I entertained respecting his communication, while it was fresh before us; but the time was then too far advanced to permit a discussion, and the present date was therefore assigned to me as a peremptory term for answering the case set up by the learned advocate of Hythe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1867

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 376 note a Compare the gateway, with small conical towers, on the reverse of a Roman coin, figured in Mr. C. K. Smith's work on Lymne, p. 249.

page 376 note b New Port, or New Haven, described as distant 1° W. in longitude, and 30′ S. in latitude, from κἀνιον ἅkappa;rho;ν, the South Foreland; while Hythe and Lymne are distant very few minutes of a degree from that promontory.

page 379 note a Leland, as quoted by Mr. C. E. Smith, except the explanations within parentheses.