Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T14:45:24.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of Names, Patterns of Places

Political geography in medieval Swaledale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Andrew Fleming
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the most common questions asked by archaeologists who study past agrarian landscapes are the following:

1) How did farmers use land (in terms of the activities by which they made a living)?

2) On what basis did they claim the right to occupy and use land (in terms of territorial possession, ‘ownership’, common rights, etc)?

3) In what sequence was land occupied, and what general principles governed sequences of colonisation, ‘intensification’, and territorial sub-division?

4) To what extent were territorial patterns stable over long periods of time? How frequently did political and social action take place in the context of a relatively unchanging political geography?

5) Was there a hierarchy of places and communities, rooted in history, which influenced their relative social, political and economic power?

Type
Discussion article
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , December 1997 , pp. 199 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, A. M., Mawer, A., Stenton, F.M. and Dickinson, B., 1950: The place-names of Cumberland, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1994: Fragments from antiquity. An archaeology of social life in Britain, 2900–1200 BC, London.Google Scholar
Beresford, M. and Hurst, J., 1990: English Heritage book of Wharram Percy deserted medieval village, London.Google Scholar
Bridgewater, N.P., 1970: The medieval homestead of Wallingstones, Transactions of the Woolhope Naturalists' Field Club 40, 75–116.Google Scholar
Clay, C.T. (ed.), 1935: Early Yorkshire charters, Leeds.Google Scholar
Cox, B., 1976: The place-names of the earliest English records, Journal of the English Place-name Society 8, 12–66.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B., 1991: Iron Age communities in Britain, London.Google Scholar
Faull, M.L., 1981: West Yorkshire. An archaeological survey to A. D. 1500, Wakefield.Google Scholar
Faull, M.L., and Stinson, M. (eds), 1986: Domesday Book 30. Yorkshire, Chichester.Google Scholar
Fellows-Jensen, G., 1972: Scandinavian settlement names in Yorkshire, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1985: Land tenure, productivity and field systems, in Barker, G. and Gamble, C. (eds), Beyond domestication in prehistoric Europe, London, 129–146.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1987: Coaxial field systems. Some questions of time and space, Antiquity 61, 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, A., 1989: The genesis of coaxial field systems, in Torrence, R. and van der Leeuw, S. (eds), What's New? A closer look at the process of innovation, London, 63–81.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1994: Swadal, Swar (and Erechwydd?). Early medieval polities in Upper Swaledale (North Yorkshire), Landscape history 16, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, A., 1996: Early roads to the Swaledale lead mines, Yorkshire archaeological journal 68, 89–100.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., in press: Towards a history of wood pasture in Swaledale (North Yorkshire), Landscape history.Google Scholar
Gelling, M., 1974: The chronology of English place-names, in Rowley, T. (ed.), Anglo-Saxon settlement and landscape, London.Google Scholar
Gelling, M., 1978: Signposts to the past, London.Google Scholar
Harrison, P., 1879: The history of Yorkshire. Vol 1, Wapentake of West Gilling, London.Google Scholar
Hey, D., 1979: The making of South Yorkshire, Ashbourne.Google Scholar
Higham, N., 1992: Rome, Britain and the Anglo-Saxons, London.Google Scholar
Hooke, D., 1989: Pre-conquest woodland. Its distribution and usage, Agricultural history review 37, 123–9.Google Scholar
Jones, G.R.J., 1971: The multiple estate as a model framework for tracing early stages in the evolution of rural settlement, in Dussart, F. (ed.), L'habitat et les paysages ruraux d'Europe, Liège1.Google Scholar
Lancaster, W.T. (ed.), 1912: Chartulary of Bridlington Priory, Leeds.Google Scholar
McDonnell, J. (ed.), 1990: Upland Pennine hamlets, Northern history 26, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevsner, N., 1966: Yorkshire. The North Riding, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Phillips, S.K., 1984: Identity, social organisation and change. Muker parish, a Yorkshire Dales community (Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
Rivet, A.L.F., and Smith, C., 1979: The place-names of Roman Britain, London.Google Scholar
Slingsby, F.W. (ed.), 1905: The registers of the parish church of Grinton in Swaledale, Leeds.Google Scholar
Smith, A.H., 1928: The place-names of the North Riding of Yorkshire, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, A.H., 1967: The place-names of Westmorland, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1979: Roads and tracks of Britain, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1983: Village and homestead, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1993: The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Bender, B. (ed.), Landscape. Politics and perspectives, London, 19–48.Google Scholar
Tweddle, D., 1990: Marrick Priory Research Project (typescript).Google Scholar
VCH, 1914: The Victoria history of the counties of England: Yorkshire North Riding, Vol. 1, London.Google Scholar