Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:24:34.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of Liao urban landscapes. Political practices and nomadic empires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Hu Lin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In traditional models, nomadic empires are often depicted as ‘parasitic’ on the neighbouring sedentary polities. Inspired by the development of anthropologies and archaeologies of colonialism, this paper adopts the political-landscape approach to address the emerging steppe urbanism of the nomadic Liao Empire. Perceptions of Liao urban landscapes are discussed from six viewpoints – settlement location, city walls, architectural orientation, camping sites, spatial segregation and sacred places – in order to understand the political practices of city making. I argue that the nomadic Khitan did not simply emulate spatial strategies of settled agricultural polities in the heartland of China, but rather produced a radically new form of urbanism that was brought forth as one of the creative instruments constitutive of authority, formed and transformed in the process of nomadic empire building in which traditions of nomadic pastoralism with ties to eastern Eurasia were manipulated and remade along with Chinese urban planning.

Keywords

political landscapepracticeperceptionurbanismnomadic empireLiaoChina
Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 2011 , pp. 223 - 243
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barfield, T., 2001: The shadow empires. Imperial state formation along the Chinese–nomad frontier, in Alcock, S., D'Altroy, T., Morrison, K. and Sinopoli, C. (eds), Empires. Perspectives from archaeology and history, Cambridge, 10–41.Google Scholar
Chai, Z., 1990: Datong Huayansi daxiongbaodian mujiegou xingzhi fenxi, in Zhang, Y. and Guo, H. (eds), Zhonghua gujianzhu, Beijing, 41–61.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J., 1991: Of revelation and revolution. Christianity, colonialism, and consciousness in South Africa, Chicago.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J., and Comaroff, J., 1997: Of revelation and revolution. The dialectics of modernity on a South African frontier, Chicago.Google Scholar
Crossley, P., 2010: Outside in. Power, identity, and the Han lineage of Jizhou, paper presented at the Perspectives on the Liao conference, New Haven, 30 September–2 October 2010.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., 1998: Consumption and cultural entanglement. Theoretical implications of an ancient Mediterranean colonial encounter, in Cusick, J. (ed.), Studies in culture contact. Interaction, culture change, and archaeology, Carbondale, 288–315.Google Scholar
Dietler, M., 1999: Consumption, cultural frontiers, and identity. Anthropological approaches to Greek colonial encounters, in Confini e frontiera nella Grecità d'Occidente (Atti del XXXVII Convegno di Studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto, 3–6 ottobre, 1997), Napoli, 475–501.Google Scholar
Ding, M., 1980: Huayansi, Beijing.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S., 1963: The political systems of empires, London.Google Scholar
Feng, Y., 1988: Liaozhi shiliu touxiazhou dilikao, Liaohai wenwu xuekan 5, 79–98.Google Scholar
Han, M., 1999: Liao Jin nongye dili, Beijing.Google Scholar
Han, M., 2006: Caoyuan yu tianyuan. Liao Jin shiqi Xiliaohe liuyu nongmuye yu huanjing, Bejing.Google Scholar
Heng, C.K., 1999: Cities of aristocrats and bureaucrats. The development of medieval Chinese cities, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Honeychurch, W., and Amartuvshin, C., 2006: States on horseback. The rise of Inner Asian confederations and empires, in Stark, M.T. (ed.), Archaeology of Asia, Malden, 255–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeychurch, W., and Amartuvshin, C., 2007: Hinterlands, urban centers, and mobile settings. The ‘new’ Old World archaeology from the Eurasian Steppe, Asian perspectives 46 (1), 36–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, J., 2004. Wudai Song Jin Yuan ren bianjiang xingji shisanzhong shuzhenggao, Beijing.Google Scholar
Jiang, N., and Feng, Y., 1982. Liaodai Yongzhou diaochaji. Wenwu 7, 30–34, 43.Google Scholar
Khazanov, A., 1994: Nomads and the outside world, Madison.Google Scholar
Kradin, N.N., and Ivliev, A.L., 2008: Deported nation. The fate of the Bohai people of Mongolia, Antiquity 82, 438–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., 2007: Liao zhongjing gucheng fuyuan chutan, in Wu, J. (ed.), Liao zhongjing lishi wenhua yanjiu, Hohhot, 9–21.Google Scholar
Weiyuanhui, Liaozhongjing Fajue 1961: Liao zhongjing chengzhi fajue de zhongyao shouhuo, Wenwu 9, 34–40.Google Scholar
Lin, H., 2010: A table of five capitals. Contests for legitimacy between the Liao and its rivals, Journal of Asian history 44 (2), 99–127.Google Scholar
Liu, P., 1996: Liao Jin de fojiao zhengce jiqi shehui yingxiang, Foxue yanjiu 5, 231–38.Google Scholar
Liu, P., 2002: Qidanzu de lishi jiyi, in Qixia xiansheng jinian wenji, Baoding, 157–71.Google Scholar
Mintz, S., 1985: Sweetness and power. The place of sugar in modern history, New York.Google Scholar
Neimenggu Wenwu Kaogu Yanjiusuo, 1994: Liao shangjing diaocha baogao, in Li, Y. and Wei, J. (eds), Neimenggu wenwu kaogu wenji, Beijing, 510–36.Google Scholar
Popova, L., Hartley, C. and Smith, A. (eds), 2007: Social orders and social landscapes, Newcastle.Google Scholar
Rogers, J.D., 2007: The contingencies of state formation in eastern Inner Asia, Asian perspectives 46 (2), 249–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, J.D., Ulambayar, E. and Gallon, M., 2005: Urban centres and the emergence of empires in Eastern Inner Asia, Antiquity 79, 801–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1985: Islands of history, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M., 1992: The economics of develop-man in the Pacific, Res 21, 12–25.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, C., 2001: Empires, in Feinman, G.M. and Price, T.D. (eds), Archaeology at the millennium. A sourcebook, New York, 439–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., 2003: The political landscape. Constellations of authority in early complex polities, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, D., 2007: The headless state. Aristocratic orders, kinship society, and misrepresentations of nomadic Inner Asia, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhardt, N.S., 1990: Chinese imperial city planning, Honolulu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhardt, N.S., 1997: Liao architecture, Honolulu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Z., 1988: Shuo fu, Shanghai.Google Scholar
Tuotuo, , 1974: Liao shi, Beijing.Google Scholar
Twitchett, D., and Tietze, K., 1994: The Liao, in Franke, H. and Twitchett, D. (eds), The Cambridge history of China, Vol. 6, Alien regimes and border states, 907–1368, Cambridge, 43–153.Google Scholar
Waugh, D.C., 2010: Nomads and settlement. New perspectives in the archaeology of Mongolia, The Silk Road 8, 97–124.Google Scholar
Wheatley, P., 1971: The pivot of the four quarters. A preliminary enquiry into the origins and character of the ancient Chinese city, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wittfogel, K., and Feng, C., 1949: History of Chinese society. Liao (907–1125), Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wu, C., 1997: Manhua Liao zhongjing, Chifeng.Google Scholar
Yang, K., 2003: Zhongguo gudai ducheng zhidu shi, Shanghai.Google Scholar
Yang, R., 1991: Qidan wangchao zhengzhi junshi zhidu yanjiu, Beijing.Google Scholar
Yuan, H., and Tang, Y., 1982: Huayansi, Wenwu 9, 78–91.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., 2006: Liao Song keju zhidu bijiao yanjiu, in X. Zhang, H. Tian, Huang, K. and Yu, J. (eds), 10–13 shiji Zhongguo wenhua de pengzhuang yu ronghe, Shanghai, 85–113.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., and Lai, Q., 2001: Liaoshi dilizhi huishi, Hefei.Google Scholar
Zhengxie Balinzuoqi Weiyuanhui, 1999: Linhuang shiji, Hohhot.Google Scholar
Zhongguo Dabaike Quanshu Zongbianji Weiyuanhui Kaoguxue Bianji Weiyuanhui, 1986: Zhongguo dabaikequanshu. Kaoguxue, Beijing.Google Scholar