Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T09:05:33.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the natural history of the peasant landscape

An archaeological dialogue with Tjalling Waterbolk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Jos Bazelmans ,
Jan Kolen  and
Waterbolk H.T
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Harm Tjalling Waterbolk (1924) is regarded, together with Pieter J.R. Modderman (1919) and Willem Glasbergen (1923–1979), as the direct inheritor of the founder of Dutch archaeology Albert Egges van Giffen (1884–1973). From the middle of the 1950s, after Van Giffen's retirement, this troika shaped the rapidly growing academic archaeology in the Netherlands. Until well into the 1970s and 1980s they occupied the most prominent chairs at the universities of Groningen, Leiden and Amsterdam. One look at Waterbolk's impressive list of publications (almost exclusively articles) tells us that for half a century he has been an authoritative participant in developments in Dutch archaeology. He has been involved, directly or indirectly, in the modernization of excavation practices, in changes in the organization of academic education and research, in the introduction of new methods and techniques and in shifts in theory and interpretation. He has made a valuable contribution to the development of large-scale settlement research, to the shaping of the Dutch legal foundation of university education (the study of prehistory in the Academisch Statuut), to the expansion of palynological research and the C14 method, and to the conceptualization of long-term continuity in the spatial organization of historical communities. His work is interesting because of the blending of a scientific interest in the history of the cultural landscape and a committed and critical involvement with the protection of such. Enough reasons to interview him ten years after his retirement. We meet Waterbolk in Meppel, a small town in south-west Drenthe, on one of the few hot days in the summer of 1996. It has been agreed that we will first pay a short visit to his birthplace in Havelte and to Van Giffen's grave in Diever. Before long it becomes clear that during the tour a web of named places and paths is gradually unfolding, each with its own historical tale and associated with personal memories. The afternoon is spent in the area between Balloo and Rolde, 5 kilometres east of Assen, the capital of the province of Drenthe. This area, which has an un-Dutch concentration of still existing and visible megalithic tombs, burial mounds, Celtic fields, and prehistoric roads, has recently become the subject of Waterbolk's interest (Waterbolk 1994a, and in press b).

Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , May 1997 , pp. 71 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, B., 1992: Theorising landscapes, and the prehistoric landscapes of Stonehenge, Man (N.S.) 27, 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brønsted, J., 1938–1940: Danmarks Oldtid, Copenhagen (3 vols).Google Scholar
Caldwell, J.R., 1958: Trend and tradition in the prehistory of the eastern United States, Springfield, Illinois (Memoir of the American Anthropological Association 88).Google Scholar
Chang, K.C., 1967: Rethinking archaeology, New York (Studies in anthropology 6, lectures delivered at an anthropology seminar at Yale University in 1966).Google Scholar
Clarke, D., 1968: Analytical archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Es, W.A van, 1968: Wijster, a native village beyond the imperial frontier 150–425 A.D., Groningen (Ph.D thesis Groningen, Paleohistoria 11).Google Scholar
Fokkens, H., 1991: Verdrinkend landschap. Archeologisch onderzoek van het westelijk Fries-Drents Plateau 4400 BC tot 500 AD, Groningen (Ph.D thesis Groningen).Google Scholar
Geer, G. de, 1940: Geochronologia suecica principles, Stockholm (Kungliga Svenska Veten-skapsakademiens Handlingar, 3th series, 18.6, 2 vols).Google Scholar
Giffen, A.E. van, 1930: Die Bauart der Einzelgräber. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der älteren individuellen Grabhugelstrukturen in den Niederlanden, Leipzig (Mannus Bibliothek 44/45).Google Scholar
Giffen, A.E. van, 1943: Opgravingen in Drente tot 1941, in Poortman, J. (ed.), Drente: een handboek voor het kennen van het Drentsche leven in voorbije eeuwen, Meppel, 393–568.Google Scholar
Giffen, A.E. van, 1947: Oudheidkundige perspectieven, in het bijzonder ten aanzien van de vaderlandsche prae- en protohistorie, Groningen (inaugural lecture Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Glasbergen, W., 1954: Barrow excavations in the Eight Beatitutes. The Bronze Age cemetery between Toterfout & Halve Mijl, North Brabant, Groningen and Jakarta (Ph.D thesis Groningen, 2 vols).Google Scholar
Heidinga, H.A., 1987: Medieval settlement and economy north of the Lower Rhine, Assen (Cingula 9).Google Scholar
Heringa, J., 1985: Lijnen en stippellijnen in de geschiedenis van de buurschap, Nieuwe Drentse volksalmanak 101, 69–93.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1991: Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London.Google Scholar
Knol, E., 1993: De Noordnederlandse kustlanden in de Vroege Middeleeuwen (Ph.D thesis Free University Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Langen, G.J. de, 1989: Publikaties van H.T. Waterbolk, Jaarverslagen Vereniging voor Terpenonderzoek 66–72, 9–24.Google Scholar
Langen, G.J. de, 1992: Middeleeuws Friesland. De economische ontwikkeling van het gewest Oostergo in de vroege en volle Middeleeuwen, Groningen (Ph.D thesis Groningen).Google Scholar
Leeuw, S. van der, 1974: The methodological debate in archaeology. Fundamental questions, Helinium 14, 174–185.Google Scholar
LouweKooijmans, L.P. Kooijmans, L.P., 1994: Another participant's view on Dutch archaeology in postwar times, Archaeological dialogues 1, 38–45.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, D., 1985: The past is a foreign country, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1973: Before civilization. The radiocarbon revolution and prehistoric Europe, London.Google Scholar
Römisch-Germanische Kommission des Deutschen Archaeologischen Instituts, 1958: Neue Ausgrabungen in Deutschland, Berlin.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1974: Ecological and systems approaches to prehistoric archaeology: a summary of recent discussion, Helinium 14, 163–173.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1994: Recent developments in Dutch archaeology. A scientific-historical outline, Archaeological dialogues 1, 9–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theuws, F., 1988: De archeologie van de periferie. Studies naar de ontwikkeling van bewoning en samenleving in het Maas-Demer-Scheldegebied in de Vroege Middeleeuwen, Amsterdam (Ph.D. thesis Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Trigger, B.G., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Vries, H. de, 1954: Measurements of age by the Carbon-14 technique, Nature 174, 1138–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterbolk, A., 1934: Havelte. Beschrijving van een interessante en typisch Drentsche gemeente, Assen.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, H.T., see above: selected bibliography.Google Scholar
Willey, G.R., and Phillips, P., 1958: Method and theory in American archaeology, Chicago.Google Scholar