Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:15:20.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A ruined past: experience and reality

An Archaeological Dialogue with Michael Shanks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Jos Bazelmans ,
Peter van Dommelen ,
Jan Kolen  and
Michael Shanks
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 56 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthes, R., 1986: The death of the author, in Barthes, R., The rustle of language, Oxford.Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. 1970: The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, in Arendt, H. (ed.), Illuminations, London.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1992: The past in the future: history and politics of identity, American anthropologist, 837–859.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1986: What is an author? in Rabinow, P., (ed.), The Foucault reader, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G., 1975: Truth and method, New York.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986: Reading the past, Cambridgex.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. and Shanks, M., 1994: Interpreting archaeologies, in Hodder, I. et al. . (eds), Interpretive archaeologies, London.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1987: Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1991: Nous n'avons jamais été modernes: essai d'anthropologie symétrique, Paris.Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1987: Material culture and mass consumption, Oxford.Google Scholar
Myers, F., 1986: Pintupi country, Pintupi self: sentiment, place, and politics among western Desert Aborigines, Washington.Google Scholar
Pearce, S., 1992: Museum objects and collections: a cultural study, Leicester.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., 1989: Comments on Archaeology into the 1990s, Norwegian archaeological review 22, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M., 1992: Experiencing the past: on the character of archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., 1993a: Archaeological realities: a series of lectures at the University of Leiden, February 10–12 1993, Lampeter (MS).Google Scholar
Shanks, M., 1993b: Archaeological experiences and a critical romanticism, in Siriiainen, A. et al. . (eds), The archaeologist and their reality: proceedings of the 4th Nordic TAG Conference, 1992, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1987a: Re-constructing archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1987b: Social theory and archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1989a: Archaeology into the 1990s, Norwegian archaeological review 22, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C., 1989b: Questions rather than answers: reply to comments on Archaeology into the 1990s, Norwegian archaeological review 22, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., 1993a: The hermeneutics of megalithic space, in Tilley, C. (ed.), Interpretative archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1993b: The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape, in Bender, B. (ed.), Landscape, politics and perspectives, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, N., 1991: Entangled objects: exchange, material culture and colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. (ed.), 1990: Reading material culture, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., n.d. a: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments, publication forthcoming.Google Scholar
Tilley, C., n.d. b: Art, architecture, landscape (Neolithic Sweden), publication forthcoming.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1989: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 1991: Post-processual developments in Anglo-American archaeology, Norwegian archaeological review 24, 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, A., 1992: Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Winner, L., 1985: Do artifacts have politics?, in Mackenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds), The social shaping of technology: how the refrigerator got its hum, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar