Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T10:24:05.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The DACS Slide Collection Licensing Scheme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Jenny Godfrey
Jenny Godfrey*
Affiliation:
Slide Library, Cardiff School of Art and Design, University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, Howard Gardens, Cardiff CF24 0SP, Wales, UK
*
Email: jgodfrey@uwic.ac.uk
Get access

Extract

For many years slide libraries in higher education institutions in the UK grew steadily in size as they accommodated the needs of new and expanding art and design courses. Although some slide librarians acquired new slides by photographing works of art in museums and art galleries, and most bought slides of the traditional art history canon from commercial publishers and art galleries, the largest proportion of these ever growing slide collections was made up of slides produced by copy photography, using slide film to photograph images taken from books, journals and exhibition catalogues. Changes in UK copyright law in 1988 made this illegal and jeopardised the ability of lecturers to present the visual material they needed for their courses. Slide librarians were forced to consider ways of getting around the law. A licence scheme ultimately emerged as the answer, but one that has its detractors and critics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , 2001 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

dedicated to the memory of Ron Davis

References

1. Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. HMSO, 1988. ISBN 0105448885.Google Scholar
2. ARLIS news-sheet no. 100 January/February 1993, p.8–9.Google Scholar
3. Audiovisual librarian vol. 15 no. 1 February 1989, p.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Reported by Allan, Rob in ARLIS news-sheet no. 88 January/February 1991, p.3–4.Google Scholar
5. Davis, Ron. ‘The professional status of slide curators’. ARLIS news-sheet no. 55 July/August 1985.Google Scholar
6. Malley, Ian. ‘Photographic Copyright and Information Management Workshop’. Audiovisual librarian vol. 16 no. 2 May 1990, p.87–90.Google Scholar
7. The current edition is Copyright in further and higher education libraries, revised and updated by Norman, Sandy. Library Association, 1999. ISBN 1856043223. Pages 42–43 give a useful summary of the current DACS licence.Google Scholar
8. Heathcote, D. ‘Copyright and off-air recording: a new ERA’. Audiovisual librarian vol. 15 no. 4, p.210–212.Google Scholar
9. Kemp, Martin. ‘>The making of slides from illustrations in books, periodicals etc.’ AAH bulletin February 1991, p.32.CrossRefThe+making+of+slides+from+illustrations+in+books,+periodicals+etc.’+AAH+bulletin+February+1991,+p.32.>Google Scholar
10. Reported by Godfrey, Jenny in ARLIS news-sheet no. 91 July/August 1991, p.5–6.Google Scholar
11. Central St Martins College of Art and Design, Harrow College, Kingston Polytechnic, Manchester Polytechnic, the Royal Academy, the Courtauld Institute, Sunderland Polytechnic and Wolverhampton Polytechnic. The slide production leaflet was re-advertised in ARLIS news-sheet no. 100 January/February 1993, p. 9.Google Scholar
12. Visual resources for design, edited by Godfrey, Jenny and McKeown, Roy. ARLIS/UK and Ireland, 1995. ISBN 0951967444.Google Scholar
13. ARLIS news-sheet no. 95 March/April 1992, p.9.Google Scholar
14. ARLIS news-sheet no. 96 May/June 1992, p.5–6.Google Scholar
15. ARLIS news-sheet no. 98 September/October 1992, p.8.Google Scholar
16. AAH bulletin no. 48 February 1993, p.3.Google Scholar
17. Duffield, Rachel. ‘Proposals for a Slide Library Licensing Scheme’. Audiovisual librarian vol. 19 no. 4 November 1993, p.285–286.Google Scholar
18. Llewellyn, Nigel. ‘Slide libraries: the copyright law’. AAH bulletin no. 52 February 1994, p.2.Google Scholar
19. Duffield, Rachel. ‘Slide Library Licensing Scheme: progressing to the next stage’. Audiovisual librarian vol. 20 no. 1 February 1994, p.45.Google Scholar
20. ARLIS news-sheet no. Ill November/December 1994, p.9–10.Google Scholar
21. Telephone call between Mistry, Umesh and Godfrey, Jenny, 30 January 1997.Google Scholar
22. AAH bulletin no. 55 November 1994, p.5 and also AAH bulletin no. 57 May 1995, p.2. Another letter was sent to Heads of Departments of Art and Design History dated 18 January 1997 by Anthea Callen, reiterating the same concerns.Google Scholar
23. ARLIS news-sheet no. 117 November/December 1995, p.4–6.Google Scholar
24. ARLIS news-sheet no. 125 March/April 1997, p.7.Google Scholar
25. Note to Vice-Chancellors and Principals from Patricia Ambrose, Policy Advisor, CVCP, 28 May 1996.Google Scholar
26. Clark, Charles. Photocopying from books and journals. BCC, 1990, p.ll;Google Scholar
quoted by Callen, Anthea in ‘Slide library licensing update’, AAH bulletin no. 64 February 1997, p. 1–2.Google Scholar
27. AAH bulletin no. 65 August 1997, p.9.Google Scholar
28. ARLIS news-sheet no. 130 January/February 1998, p.14.Google Scholar
29. Now Google Scholar
30. Paine, Nigel on the scls discussion list 31 August 2000 and AAH bulletin no. 71 June 1999, front page.Google Scholar
31. ARLIS news-sheet no. 115 July/August 1995, p.9–10.Google Scholar