Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:45:59.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital images and art historians – Compare and contrast revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Margaret E. Graham  and
Christopher Bailey
Margaret E. Graham*
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Engineering & Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
Christopher Bailey*
Affiliation:
School of Arts & Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK
*
Email: margaret.graham@unn.ac.uk
Email: c.bailey@northumbria.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

As the number of digital images available to art historians grows apace, it is perhaps an opportune moment to consider what impact digital images have had on the discipline and on the work methods of art historians. This paper revisits the findings of a research project – Compare and contrast – focusing on the attitudes of art historians towards digital image technologies, the role of the technologies in the different phases and activities of the research process, the tools and their potential, and barriers to the use of digital images.

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , 2006 , pp. 21 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bailey, C. and Graham, M.E.. ‘The corpus and the art historian,’ in Digital evidence: selected papers from DHR2000, Digital Resources for the Humanities Conference, University of Sheffield, September 2000, ed. Eraser, M. and others, 115-130 (London: Office for Humanities Communication, 2001).Google Scholar
2. Bailey, C. and Graham, M., ‘Compare and contrast: the impact of digital image technology on art history,’ in Digital environments: design, heritage and architecture; CHArt conference proceedings, volume 2, 2000, ed. Szrajber, T., http://www.chart.ac.uk/chartl999/index.html.Google Scholar
3. Bailey, C. and Graham, M.E., ‘Compare and contrast: measuring the impact of digital image on the discipline of art history,’ in DRH99: A selection of papers from Digital Resources in the Humanities 1999, ed. Deegan, M. and Short, H., 11-24 (London: Office for Humanities Communication, 2000): 11–24.Google Scholar
4. Bakewell, E., Beeman, W.O., and Reese, C.M., Object image inquiry: the art historian at work; report on a collaborative study by the Getty Art History Information Program (AHIP) and the Institute for Research in Information and Scholarship (IRIS), Brown University (Santa Monica, Calif.: AHIE 1988).Google Scholar
5. Brilliant, R., ‘How an art historian connects art and information,’ Library trends 37, no. 2 (1988): 120–129.Google Scholar
6. Markey, K., ‘Access to iconographical research collections,’ Library trends 37, no. 2 (1988): 154–174.Google Scholar