Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:01:14.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law of the Sea - Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment edited by Malgosia FITZMAURICE and Dai TAMADA. Leiden: Brill, 2016. ix+423 pp. Hardcover: £103; $168.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

Atsushi ISHII
Atsushi ISHII*
Affiliation:
Center for Northeast Asian Studies, Tohoku University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Asian Journal of International Law , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , July 2017 , pp. 389 - 390
Copyright
© Asian Journal of International Law 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, 2 December 1946, 2 December 1946, 161 U.N.T.S. 72 (entered into force 10 November 1948), art. 8 [ICRW].

5. Ibid., preamble.

6. This rather nationalistic tone is in line with other Japanese literature on the Judgment. For example, see SAKAMOTO Shigeki, “The Whaling in the Antarctic Case from a Japanese Perspective” (2015) 58 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 247; OKUWAKI Naoya, “Hogei Saiban ni yosete” [On the Whaling Case] (2014) No. 636 Kokusai Mondai [International Affairs] 1.

7. Kenneth ABBOTT and Duncan SNIDAL, “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance” (2000) 54 International Organization 421.