Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:24:28.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Re)-Defining ‘Teacher’: Preservice Teachers with Disabilities in Canadian Teacher Education Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

Alina Wilson ,
Laura Sokal  and
Deb Woloshyn
Alina Wilson*
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg, Canada
Laura Sokal
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg, Canada
Deb Woloshyn
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg, Canada
*
Correspondence: Alina Wilson, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, R3B 2E9. Email: alinaw@mts.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Directors of Student Teaching from the Western Canadian provinces participated in focus groups about the realities and decision-making processes around practicum for preservice teachers with disabilities. Results showed current standards, when applied rigidly, served to reify a static, homogenous, and unrealistic definition of ‘teacher’ that marginalises preservice teachers with disabilities. However, the effort of directors to challenge this notion of ‘teacher’, framed within the constructionist model of disability, gives hope for a more inclusive future teaching force.

Keywords

teacher educationinclusionpreservice teacherpracticum
Type
Original Articles
Information
Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: Preparing Special and Inclusive Educators for Their New Roles in the 21st Century , July 2018 , pp. 17 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*This manuscript was accepted under the Editorship of Umesh Sharma.

References

Anderson, R. C. (2006). Teaching (with) disability: Pedagogies of lived experience. The Review of Education, Pedagogy, & Cultural Studies, 28, 367–379. doi:10.1080/10714410600873258Google Scholar
Anderson, R. J., & Karp, J. M. (1998). The role of support systems for educators with disabilities. In Anderson, R. J., Keller, C. E., & Karp, J. M. (Eds.), Enhancing diversity: Educators with disabilities (pp. 201–217). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. (2008). Let's tell you a story: Use of vignettes in focus group discussions on HIV/AIDS among migrant and mobile men in Goa, India. In Liamputtong, P. (Ed.), Doing cross-cultural research: Ethical and methodological perspectives (pp. 253–264). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8567-3_16Google Scholar
Beckett, A. E. (2014). Non-disabled children's ideas about disability and disabled people. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 856–875. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.800444Google Scholar
Bryant, L. G., & Curtner-Smith, M. D. (2008). Impact of a physical education teacher's disability on elementary pupils’ perceptions of effectiveness and learning. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 25, 118–131. doi:10.1123/apaq.25.2.118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, F. A. K. (2009). Having a career in disability studies without even becoming disabled! The strains of the disabled teaching body. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 713–725. doi:10.1080/13603110903046002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2014). Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2-2014/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Clayton, J. K. (2009). Teacher with a learning disability: Legal issues and district approach. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 12 (2), 1–7. doi:10.1177/1555458909336842Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Driscoll, D. L. (2011). Introduction to primary research: Observations, surveys, and interviews. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/writingspaces2/driscoll--introduction-to-primary-research.pdfGoogle Scholar
Duquette, C. (2000). Examining autobiographical influences on student teachers with disabilities. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6, 215–228. doi:10.1080/713698718Google Scholar
Ferri, B. A., Keefe, C. H., & Gregg, N. (2001). Teachers with learning disabilities: A view from both sides of the desk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 22–32. doi:10.1177/002221940103400103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, S., Sarver, M. D., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349. doi:10.1177/07419325030240060501Google Scholar
Gerber, P. J. (1998). Trials and tribulations of a teacher with learning disabilities through his first two years of employment. In Anderson, R. J., Keller, C. E., & Karp, J. M. (Eds.), Enhancing diversity: Educators with disabilities (pp. 41–59). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Getzel, E. E. (2008). Addressing the persistence and retention of students with disabilities in higher education: Incorporating key strategies and supports on campus. Exceptionality, 16, 207–219. doi:10.1080/09362830802412216Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update, 1997(19). Retrieved from http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.htmlGoogle Scholar
Gilham, C. M., & Tompkins, J. (2016). Inclusion reconceptualized: Pre-service teacher education and disability studies in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 39 (4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Gilson, S. F., & DePoy, E. (2002). Theoretical approaches to disability content in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, H. (1994). The minority group model of disability: Implications for medical sociology. Research in the Sociology of Health Care, 11, 3–24.Google Scholar
Haralambos, M., & Holborn, M. (2008). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (7th ed.). London, UK: HarperCollins UK.Google Scholar
Kattari, S. K. (2015). Examining ableism in higher education through social dominance theory and social learning theory. Innovative Higher Education, 40, 375–386. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9320-0Google Scholar
Lin, J. (2005). The teaching profession: Trends from 1999 to 2005. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-004-x/2006004/9540-eng.htmGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. (2017, February). Inclusion: Who, what, where, when, why? Keynote address presented at the WestCAST 2017 annual conference, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
Pink, W. T. (2017). Schools as reform incubators. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.13Google Scholar
Pugach, M. C., Blanton, L. P., & Florian, L. (2012). Unsettling conversations: Diversity and disability in teacher education [Editorial]. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 235–236. doi:10.1177/0022487112447573Google Scholar
Riddick, B. (2003). Experiences of teachers and trainee teachers who are dyslexic. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 7, 389–402. doi:10.1080/1360311032000110945Google Scholar
Sokal, L., & Desjardins, N. (2016). What students want you to know: Promoting achievement in postsecondary students with anxiety disorders. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27 (3). Retrieved from http://celt.miamioh.edu/ject/issue.php?v=27&n=3Google Scholar
Sokal, L., Woloshyn, D., & Wilson, A. (2017). Pre-service teachers with disabilities: Challenges and opportunities for directors of student teaching in western Canada. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8 (3), 1–18. doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.3.7Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Tang, K. C., & Davis, A. (1995). Critical factors in the determination of focus group size. Family Practice, 12, 474–475. doi:10.1093/fampra/12.4.474Google Scholar
Valle, J. W., Solis, S., Volpitta, D., & Connor, D. J. (2004). The disability closet: Teachers with learning disabilities evaluate the risks and benefits of “coming out”. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37, 4–17. doi:10.1080/10665680490422070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, G., & Sharoni, V. (2011). ‘My success as a teacher amazes me each and every day’ – perspectives of teachers with learning disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15, 479–495. doi:10.1080/13603110903131721Google Scholar
White, M. (2010). Demographic and employment characteristics of teachers in the survey. In C. Naylor & M. White (Eds.), The worklife of British Columbia teachers in 2009: A BCTF study of working and learning conditions. Retrieved from https://bctf.ca/uploadedFiles/Public/Issues/WorklifeWorkload/2009/Chapter1.pdfGoogle Scholar