Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:27:40.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of the Sociopolitical Environment on Developments in Special Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

James M. Kauffman
James M. Kauffman*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current sociopolitical context of special education is one of dangerous currents. I will give a brief overview of three of these currents and then discuss how we might proceed to avoid their taking us where we don’t want to go.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australasian Journal of Special Education , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 3 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © The Australian Association of Special Education 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Keynote presentation at the Australian Association of Special Education Conference, Perth, Western Australia, October, 1992. Preparation of this presentation was supported in part by the Commonwealth Centre for the Education of Teachers, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia

References

Axelrod, S. (1991). The problem: American education. The solution: Use behavior analytic technology. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 275–282.Google Scholar
Berliner, D. (1992, February). Educational reform in an era of disinformation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Blackman, H.P. (1989). Special education placement: Is it what you know or where you live? Exceptional Children, 55, 459–462.Google Scholar
Blackman, H.P. (1992). Surmounting the disability of isolation. The School Administrator, 49(2), 28–29.Google Scholar
Blatt, B. (1979). Bandwagons also go to funerals: Unmailed letters 1 And 2. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12(4), 17–19.Google Scholar
Carnine, D. (1992). Untested tools deprive special education students of an effective education. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the tools of Educators.Google Scholar
Chapman, J.W. (1992). Learning disabilities in New Zealand: Where Iciwis and kids with LD can’t fly. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 362–370.Google Scholar
DeStefano, L., & Wagner, M. (1991). Outcome assessment in special education: Lessons learned. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.Google Scholar
Eisner, E.W. (1992). The federal reform of schools: Looking for the silver bullet. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 722–723.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1988). Response to Wang and Walberg. Exceptional Children, 55, 138–146.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1991). Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists versus conservationists. In J. W. Lloyd, , Repp, A.C., & Singh, N.N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 241–255). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Fernstrom, P. (1992). A conservative approach to special education reform: Mainstreaming through transenvironmental programming. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D.K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.Google Scholar
Goodlad, J.I. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Goodwin, T., Wurzburg, G. (Producers and Directors), & D., Biklen (Executive Producer). (1987). Regularities. [Video Cassette]. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., & Gottlieb, B.W. (1991). Mainstreaming academically handicapped children in urban schools. In Lloyd, J.W., Repp, A.C., & Singh, N.N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 95–112). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Howe, K.R., & Miramontes, O. B. (1992). The ethics of special education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1989). The regular education initiative as Reagan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach. Journal of Special Education, 23, 256–278.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1990, April). What happens when special education works? The sociopolitical context of special education research in the 1990s. Invited address, Special Interest Group: Special Education Research, annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1991). Restructuring in sociopolitical context: Reservations about the effects of current reform proposals on students with disabilities. In Lloyd, J. W., Repp, A.C., & Singh, N. N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 57–66). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1992a). School reform disorder: Alternative responses to nonsense. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 157–174.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. (1992b). Foreword. In Howe, K.R. & Miramontes, O. B., The ethics of special education (pp. xi–xvii). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, J.M. & Hallahan, D.P. (1993). Toward a comprehensive service delivery system. In Goodlad, J. I. & Lovitt, T.C. (Eds.), Integrating general and special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kundera, M. (1990). Immortality [translated by Peter Kussi]. New York: Grove Weidenfeld.Google Scholar
Lindsley, O.R. (1992). Why aren’t effective teaching tools widely adopted? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 21–26.Google Scholar
Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1987). Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings. Exceptional Children, 54, 69–74.Google Scholar
Lipsky, D. K., & Gartner, A. (1991). Restructuring for quality. In Lloyd, J. W., Repp, A.C., & Singh, N.N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models (pp. 43–57). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
National Center on Education and the Economy. (1989). To secure our future. Rochester, NY: Author.Google Scholar
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1992). School reform: Opportunities for excellence and equity for individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 276–280.Google Scholar
K., Phillips (1990). The politics of ridi and poor: Wealth and the American electorate in the Reagan aftermath. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Sarason, S.B. (1990), The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we cliange course before it ‘s too late! San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In Lloyd, J.W., Repp, A.C., & Singh, N. N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 226–239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Walker, H.M., & Bullis, M. (1991). Behavior disorders and the social context of regular class integration: A conceptual dilemma? In Lloyd, J. W., Repp, A.C., & Singh, N. N. (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues and models (pp. 75–93). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Four fallacies of segregationism. Exceptional Children, 55, 128–137.Google Scholar
Weisman, J. (1992). The education smokescreen. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 721.Google Scholar
Wiesel, E. (1992, April 19). When passion is dangerous. Parade Magazine, 20–21.Google Scholar
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M L. (1992). Critical issues in special education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar