Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T14:15:25.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Student's Perceptions Tell Us About Teaching Environmental Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Extract

Throughout Australia there has been a substantial interest in enviromental education for more than a decade. Much human and financial effort has gone into curriculum development at the school level and into support for implementation via inservice education, conferences, workshops, etc. Relatively little systematic evaluation of these efforts has been undertaken at the level of what students are learning.

Most definitions of enviromental education internationally and in Australia emphasise the importance of affective learning concerning the environment alongside more usual cognitive knowledge and skills. Accordingly any evaluation should recognise this somewhat unusual balance among the intended learnings compared with most other subject areas.

Recent research in several areas of school learning has brought out the importance of starting with an explicit recognition of the perceptions and understandings students already hold about topics. Teaching and learning of the topic then ought to be processes that enable the learners to generate or construct from these starting points, new understandings and perceptions. There has, however, been almost no research, apart from a comparative study by Schaeffer and his co-workers of West German and Phillippino secondary school students' associations with the word, ENVIRONMENT. (Schaeffer, 1979; Hernandez, 1981; Villavicencio, 1981). This paper reports an attempt in Victoria to begin to fill these gaps.

Type
Section 2: Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, J. & Mitchell, I. Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning, Monash University Printer, Melbourne, Victoria, 1986.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. & Marland, P. A comparison of student thinking in a mathematics and science classroom. Research in Science Education, 14, 2938, 1984.Google Scholar
Fensham, P.J. and May, J. B.Servant not Master – A new role for science in a core of environmental education”. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 25 1524, 1979.Google Scholar
Fensham, P.J. & Johnson, B.J. Learners' response to the idea of environment. Research in Science Education, 15, 131139, 1985.Google Scholar
Hernandez, D. F. The Concept of Health and Environment in Rural Communities: Two Case Studies. Monograph No. 19, Diliman, Quezon City, Science Education Centre, University of the Philippines, 1981.Google Scholar
Middleton, M., Brennan, M., O'Neil, M., and Wootten, T. Making the Future: The Role of Secondary Education in Australia, Commonwealth Schools Commission, Canberra ACT., 1986.Google Scholar
Novak, J. Effective science instruction: The achievement of shared meaning. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 27 (1), 514, 1981.Google Scholar
Ponniah, W. Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Monash University, 1983.Google Scholar
Schaefer, G. Concept Formation in Biology The Concept Growth. Environmental Journal of Science Education, 1(1), 87101, 1979.Google Scholar
Vilavicencio, R.R. The Concept of Health: A Preliminary Investigation among Secondary Students in the Philippines. Monograph No.20, Dilman Quezon City, Science Education Center, Universtiy of the Philippines, 1981.Google Scholar