Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T00:27:17.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental education: a decade of failure but some hope for the future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

M. Walsh*
Affiliation:
Center for Education, University of Tasmania, Horbert. 7000

Extract

The world is experiencing a number of major problems (overpopulation, too-rapid urbanisation, uncontrolled technology, habitat destruction etc.) which are threatening the future of human life on earth. To document the alleged causes of environmental degradation as such a list of discrete problems as is done by many writers (Palme, 1972; Burnet, 1979 etc.) can lead to an erroneous supposition that provided a systematic solution can be found for each problem, then the future is likely to be less threatened. This supposition is incorrect because the crisis has arisen from the threat posed by the whole, that is, the irrevocable links which exist between each of these problem areas such as those listed above. Resolving one problem satisfactorily on a global scale will not provide solutions for the other problem areas. The solution must lie with an approach which might not only solve many present problems but also prevent new problems from arising. Such a remedy reflects on the ecological nature of the problem, recognising that “everything is connected to everything else” (Commoner, 1972a). From around 1970, this role has been allocated specifically to education. Perelman (1976) saw a need to develop ecological pedagogy, an educational process that is ecological not only in its subject matter but in its structure and dynamics as well. Both Ehrlich (1971) and Commoner (1972b) saw education as a necessary component of any solution. Boyden (1970) argued that educational institutions must be placed at the top of the list of agents whose task is to reverse the trend towards environmental degradation. He noted that a key task for present adult generations is to provide youth with an environmental education (EE) that will prepare them emotionally and intellectually for the role of protecting the biosphere. Stapp (1970, 24) remarked on the need for well-informed educators: “If individuals are to be prepared to make the kind of environmental decisions that our nation will face in the future, schools must embark on a comprehensive program that will span the curriculum (K-12).”

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyden, S., 1970. Environmental Change: Perspectives and Responsibilities, in Education and the Environmental Crisis. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Bruner, J.S., 1960. The Process of Education. New York: VintageGoogle Scholar
Burnet, F.M., 1979. Credo and Comment. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Commoner, B., 1972a. The Closing Circle: Nature, Man and Technology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Commoner, B., 1972b. Science and Social Action: The Science Teacher, 39 (5).Google Scholar
Curriculum Development Centre, 1981. Environmental Education: A Sourcebook for Secondary Education. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R., 1971 The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. and Adelman, C., 1976. “Innovation at the Classroom Level” in Innovation, the School and the Teacher. Walton Hall, Milton Keynes: Open University PressGoogle Scholar
Fensham, P.J. 1978. Stockholm to Tbilisi — the Evolution of Environmental Education. Prospects, VIII (4).Google Scholar
Fensham, P.J. 1978a. Beyond Tbilisi — An End and a Beginning for Environmental Education. Unesco News, 29 (3).Google Scholar
Greenall, A., 1981. “An Introduction to Environmental Education” in Environmental Education: A Sourcebook for Secondary Education. Canberra. Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Henry, J. A., 1981. Teachers as Researchers and a Redefinition of the Theory / Practice Gap in Education. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, 11 12-15, 1981.Google Scholar
Henry, J.A., 1982. What Could be: Environmental Education as “Education for the Environment”. A paper presented as part of a seminar at the Second National Conference of the Australian Association for Environmental Education, Brisbane, 06 27 - July 2, 1982.Google Scholar
Lucas, A.M., 1980. Science and Environmental Education: Pious Hopes, Self Praise and Disciplinary Chauvinism. Studies in Science Education, 7, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A.M., 1980a. The Role of Science Education in Education for the Environment. Journal of Environmental Education, 12, (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Bow, A., 1977. Opening Address, UNESCO Conference, Tbilisi. In Final Report, Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi, U.S.S.R., 1977. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Palme, O., 1972. Breakthrough to Action. In Environment Stockholm, Centre for Economic and Social Information. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Perelman, L.J., 1976. The Global Mind: Beyond the Limits to Growth. New York: Mason/Charter.Google Scholar
Robottom, I.M., 1982. What is: Environmental Education as “Education about the Environment”. A paper presented as part of a seminar at the Second National Conference of the Australian Association for Environmental Education, Brisbane06 27 - July 2, 1982.Google Scholar
Stapp, W., 1970. A Strategy for Curriculum Development and Implementation in Environmental Education at the Elementary and Secondary Levels. In Education and the Environmental Crisis. Canberra: Australian Academy o Science.Google Scholar
Stokes, D. and Womersley, J., 1981. Environmental Education: A Conceptual Framework. In Environmental Education: A Sourcebook for Secondary Education. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
UNESCO, 1977. Final Report — Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi, 1977. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Watts, D.G., 1969. Environmental Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar