Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T06:16:10.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fieldwork, Sustainability, and Environmental Education: The Centrality of Geographical Inquiry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

Niranjan Casinader Open the ORCID record for Niranjan Casinader [Opens in a new window]  and
Gillian Kidman
Niranjan Casinader*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Gillian Kidman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Niranjan Casinader, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Wellington Rd, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia. Email: niranjan.casinader@monash.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common notions around the concept of sustainability tend to be framed within the values and principles that the world's natural environments need to be used and managed in such a way as to make them available for future generations. Consequently, pedagogical approaches in environmental education that follow this intellectual thread tend to adopt a standard scientific approach to inquiry-based learning. This article argues that the features of a geographical approach to inquiry, particularly in its wider conceptualisation of fieldwork, provides a much more effective means of developing an environmental education that is more cogniscent of the deeper aspects of sustainability. While the importance of the natural systems components of sustainability cannot be ignored, they tend to displace other inherent facets within the sustainability concept and, in particular, the reality that any discussion as to the sustainable use of natural environments must incorporate knowledge and understanding of the way people interact with these environments. We contend that sustainability, when taught in schools, has tended to be environmentally and scientifically based, diminishing the role of humans. In an example of how this deficit might be overcome, the Australian Curriculum incorporates sustainability as one of the three mandatory cross-curriculum priorities; that is, one of the avenues for encouraging complementary learning and teaching across different disciplines. Within this curriculum framework, the concept is expanded to not only include a consideration of the mutual interdependence of the environmental spheres (Systems), but also World View and Futures — thus including the human component. However, using the notion of the fieldwork imperative (Casinader & Kidman, 2017), which distinguishes between the reasons why we do fieldwork and the reasons why we should do fieldwork, we argue that sustainability education would be placed more effectively within the disciplinary domain of Geography, rather than as part of an integrated curriculum approach or in Science.

Keywords

fieldworkgeographical inquiryenvironmental educationinquiry learningsustainability
Type
Feature Articles
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, A.A. (2002). Culture, education, and development in South Africa. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (n.d.) Sustainability. Retrieved 21 August 21, 2017, from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability/Google Scholar
Bliss, S. (2009). Fieldwork: The heart of geography. Geography Bulletin, 41, 7–11.Google Scholar
Brundtland, G.H. (Ed.). (1987). Foreword. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (pp. ix–xv). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (2012). Sustainability education and teacher education: Finding a natural habitat? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 28, 108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casinader, N. (2014). Culture, transnational education and thinking: Case studies in global schooling. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casinader, N., & Kidman, G. (2017). Fieldwork as a vehicle for Sustainability Education: The centrality of geographical inquiry. Paper presented at the 5th Education for Sustainability Asia Conference, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
de Baros, Almeida, P.A., & Cruz, N. (2012). Fieldwork in geology: Teachers’ conception and practices. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 829–834Google Scholar
Dei, G.J.S., & Asgharzadeh, A. (2006). Indigenous knowledges and globalization: An African perspective. In Abdi, A.A., Puplampu, K.P., & Sefa Dei, G.J. (Eds.), African education and globalization (pp. 53–78). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Natural Resources, 30, 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyment, J.E., Hill, A., & Emery, S. (2015). Sustainability as a cross-curricular priority in the Australian Curriculum: A Tasmanian investigation. Environmental Education Research, 21, 1105–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilam, E., & Trop, T. (2011). ESD pedagogy: A guide for the perplexed. Journal of Environmental Education, 42, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, J. (2013). Whatever happened to the enquiry approach in geography? In Lambert, D. & Jones, M. (Eds.), Debates in geography education (pp. 103–115). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Firth, R., & Winter, C. (2014). Constructing education for sustainable development: The secondary school geography curriculum and initial teacher training. Environmental Education Research, 13, 599–619. doi:10.1080/13504620701659079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foskett, N. (1999). Forum: Fieldwork in the Geography Curriculum — International perspectives and research issues. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, R.J. (2010). Beyond cliché — Reclaiming the concept of sustainability. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 26, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, J.R., Jenkins, A., Lee, R., Monk, J., Riley, J., Shepherd, I.D.H. & Unwin, D.J. (Eds.). (1991). Teaching geography in higher education: A manual of good practice. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gough, A. (2008). Towards more effective learning for sustainability: Reconceptualising science education. Transnational Curriculum Inquiry, 5, 32–50.Google Scholar
Hill, A. (2013). The place of experience and the experience of place: Intersections between sustainability education and outdoor learning. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 29, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A., & Dyment, J.E. (2016). Hopes and prospects for the sustainability cross-curriculum priority: Provocations from a state-wide case study, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, D., & Barkemeyer, R. (2012), Media coverage of sustainable development issues — Attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustainable Development, 20, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckle, J. (1991). Education for sustainability: Assessing pathways to the future. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 7, 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckle, J. (2012). Towards greater realism in learning for sustainability. In Wals, A.E.J. & Corcoran, P.B. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 35–48). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvie, I.C. (1967). On theories of fieldwork and the scientific character of social anthropology. Philosophy of Science, 34, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennelly, J., Taylor, N., & Serow, P. (2011). Education for Sustainability and the Australian Curriculum. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27, 209–218. doi:10.1375/ajee.27.2.209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidman, G., & Casinader, N. (2017). Inquiry-based teaching and learning across disciplines: Comparative theory and practice in schools. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleeman, G. (2009). Doing fieldwork with year 7. Geography Bulletin, 41, 2–6.Google Scholar
Kopnina, H. (2014). Revisiting Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Examining anthropocentric bias through the transition of environmental education to ESD. Sustainable Development, 22, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, H. (2012). The images of science through cultural lenses: A Chinese study on the nature of science. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2016). The New Zealand Curriculum website. Retrieved March 19, 2017, from http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum#collapsible6Google Scholar
Nielsen, K.H., Harbsmeier, M., & Ries, C.J. (2012). Studying scientists and scholars in the field: An introduction. In Nielsen, K.H., Harbsmeier, M., & Ries, C.J. (Eds.), Studying scientists and scholars in the field: Studies in the history of fieldwork and expeditions (pp. 9–28). Arhus/Kobenhavn, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Njoku, N.C. (2015). Environmental sustainability through effective teaching of Christian moral education. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5, 39–43.Google Scholar
O'Byrne, D., Dripps, W., & Nicholas, K.A. (2015). Teaching and learning sustainability: An assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustainability Science, 10, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, J. (1974). Man's responsibility for Nature. London: Duckworth and Co.Google Scholar
Pawson, E., Fournier, E., Haigh, M., Muniz, O., Trafford, J., & Vajoczki, S. (2006). Problem-based learning in geography: Towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 103–116. doi:10.1080/03098260500499709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, D., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the Wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, S., Farioli, F., & Zamagni, A. (2012). Progress in sustainability science: Lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: Part 1. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1653–1672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education: Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 11–37.Google Scholar
Scott, G.W., Boyd, M., Scott, L., & Colquhoun, D. (2015). Barriers to biological fieldwork: What really prevents teaching out of doors? Journal of Biological Education, 49, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumba, O. (2012). Learning for sustainability in science education in Africa: ‘Learning as connection’ an imperative for transformation. In Wals, A.E.J. & Corcoran, P.B. (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 425–438). Wageningen, the Netherlands: Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Stoddart, D.R. (1986). On geography and its history. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Savage, J. (2011). Cross curricular teaching and learning in the secondary school. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: Issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 11, 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, N., Littledyke, M., & Eames, C. (2009). Why do we need to teach Education for Sustainability at the primary level? In Littledyke, M., Taylor, N., & Eames, C. (Eds.), Education for Sustainability in the Primary Curriculum: A guide for teachers (pp. 1–7). Melbourne, Australia: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Declaration, Tbilisi. (1977). Retrieved August 21, 2017, from http://www.gdrc.org/uem/ee/tbilisi.html.Google Scholar
Nations, United. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, General Assembly Resolution 42/187. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/a42r187.htm.Google Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2004). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft International Implementation Scheme. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). (1976). The Belgrade Charter: A global framework for environmental education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future (Brundtland Report). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar