Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:54:01.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Grasp Environmental Complexities? Photographic Narratives and Environmental Concept Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Iris Bergmann
Iris Bergmann*
Affiliation:
Southern Cross University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How learners come to grips and can transform their thinking about something extremely complex such as environmental issues are addressed with this research. It is argued that the qualities of the visual mode of information processing are of particular relevance for cognition in the environmental context. This paper reports on a study of the photographic experience of nineteen participants who worked individually on an environmental photography project of their choice over a period of up to ten weeks. It was found that on completion of their project, the participants' conceptualisations of their topics became more differentiated, complex and defined; multiple perspectives were constructed and their own positions and feelings clarified. Above all, a notion of optimism emerged after Initial conceptualisations of environmental issues as issues of pollution, degradation, violation and death. This paper discusses the cognitive potential of the visual mode for the development of environmental thinking and presents some examples of conceptual shifts through the photographic work.

Type
Research Article
Information
Australian Journal of Environmental Education , Volume 15: Volume 15-16 , 1999 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnheim, R. 1969, Visual Thinking, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Aylwin, S. 1977, ‘The structure of visual and kinaesthetic imagery: A free association study’, British Journal of Psychology, vol. 68, pp. 353–360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aylwin, S. 1981, ‘Types of relationship instantiated in verbal, visual and enactive imagery’, Journal of Mental Imagery, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
Beech, J.R. 1980, ‘Imaginal vs perceptual scanning of a visual Representation’, Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 50, pp. 367–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, B.L. 1989, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Bergmann, I.M. 1998, Visual Imagery and Concept Formation about Environmental Issues through Creative Photography, PhD Thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1990, Language & Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, L.E. Jr., Dominowski, R.L. & Loftus, E.F. 1979, Cognitive Processes, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Cullis, T. 1996, Statement to the Kuching Conference, Paper presented at the 39th WEF International Conference on Education and the Environment: Towards Equitable and Sustainable Development, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 6-10 08.Google Scholar
Fien, J. 1991, ‘Towards School-level Curriculum Inquiry In Environmental Education’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 7 (08), pp.17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. 1994, ‘On Visual Design Thinking: The Visual Kids Of Architecture’, Design Studies, vol. 15, pp. 158–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, A. (1997). Education and the Environment: Policy, Trends and the Problems of Marginalisation. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Gough, N. 1990, ‘Healing The Earth Within Us: Environmental Education As Cultural Criticism’, Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, N. 1991, ‘Narrative And Nature: Unsustainable Fictions In Environmental Education’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 7 (08), pp. 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, N. 1994, ‘Narration, Reflection, Diffraction: Aspects Of Fiction In Educational Inquiry’, Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D. 1993, ‘Reclaiming The Future: What Every Educator Needs To Know’, Australian Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 9, pp. 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John-Steiner, V. 1986, Notebooks of the Mind. Explorations of Thinking, (3rd ed.), University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. 1983, Ghosts in the Mind's Machine, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. & Koenig, O. 1992, Wet Mind, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lather, P. 1991, Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern, Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, C., 1995, Landscape Perception and the Photographic Representation of the Australian Environment: Towards an Ecological View, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Merriam, S.B. 1988, Case Study Research in Education. A Qualitative Approach, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Mikelskis, H. 1988, Ökologische Bildung als Neugestaltung des Verhältnisses der Menschen zur Natur im Erleben, Erkennen und Handeln, in Cube, F. v. & Storch, V. (Eds.), Umweltpädagogik: Ansätze, Analysen, Ausblicke, (pp. 108–119), Ed. Schindele, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Miles, M.B. & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Neisser, U. 1987, Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Neuman, W.L. 1994, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, (2nd ed.), Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. 1975, ‘Perceptual Comparisons Through The Mind's Eye’, Memory and Cognition, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 635–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, E. & Gleick, J. (1990). Nature's Chaos. London: Scribners.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z.W. 1981, ‘The Imagery Debate: Analogue Media Versus Tacit Knowledge’, Psychological Review, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 16–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, S.K. 1993, ‘Visualization in science and the arts’, in Art, Science and Visual Literacy: Selected Readings from the 24th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 30 09 - 4 Oct 1992.Google Scholar
Ryan, P. 1993, Video Mind, Earth Mind: Art, Communications and Ecology, Peter Lang, New York.Google Scholar
Shlain, L. 1998, The Alphabet Versus the Goddess, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
Slaughter, R. 1991, Futures Concepts and Powerful Ideas, Futures Study Centre, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Townsend, R. D. 1982, An Investigation into the Underlying Structure of the Domain of Environmental Education Concepts, PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University, Ohio.Google Scholar