Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:21:23.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small Screen Technology Use Among Indigenous Boarding School Adolescents from Remote Regions of Western Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2014

Genevieve Marie Johnson  and
Rhonda Oliver
Genevieve Marie Johnson
Affiliation:
School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Rhonda Oliver*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Rhonda Oliver, School of Education, Curtin University, Perth WA 6845, Australia. Email: rhonda.oliver@curtin.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

The uptake of small screen technology by adolescents is widespread, particularly in industrial nations. Whether the same is true for Australian Aboriginal youth is less clear as there is a dearth of research in this regard. Therefore, in this exploratory study the use of small screen technology by Indigenous students was examined. Twenty-four Indigenous adolescents (mean age 16.4 years) attending a boarding school in a remote region of Western Australia participated in individual and in-depth structured interviews that queried their use of: (1) television, (2) video games, (3) computers, (4) the internet, and (5) mobile phones. The results showed that mobile phones were the most frequently used and the most popular (i.e., they were nominated as first choice in a hypothetical scenario), followed by the internet, whereas television, video games and computers were used less often. It did appear that mobile phones were used by participating Aboriginal adolescents in ways similar to non-Indigenous adolescents (e.g., not only to make phone calls, but also to send text messages and access the internet). However, their mobile phone use did reflect differences based on their cultural values and identity, and also reflected their physical distance from their family (i.e., because of their enrolment at a boarding school). This study supports anecdotal evidence of a rapid uptake of mobile phones by Indigenous adolescents. It also suggests that as the small screen technology of choice, they have the potential to be utilised for educational opportunities.

Keywords

Indigenous adolescentssmall screen technologyWestern Australia
Type
Research Article
Information
The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , December 2014 , pp. 75 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akilli, G.K. (2007). Games and simulations: A new approach in education? In Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., & Prensky, M. (Eds.), Games and simulations in online learning: Research and development frameworks (pp. 1–20). Hershey, PA: Information Science.Google Scholar
Anderson, P.N., & Courtney, L. (2011). Students using Indigenous knowledge in video game creation to develop design thinking skills. In Felicia, P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 806–819). Hershey, PA: Information Science.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2009). Experimental estimates and projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, 1991 to 2021 (Cat. no. 3238.0). Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2011). Household use of information technology, Australia, 2010–11 (Cat. no. 8146.0). Canberra, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
Black, R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Addressing the digital divide in rural Australia. Lismore, Australia: Southern Cross University. Retrieved from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw07/papers/refereed/black/paper.htmlGoogle Scholar
Black, R., & Steinkuehler, C. (2009). Literacy in virtual worlds. In Christenbury, L., Bomer, R., & Smargorinsky, P. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 271–286). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Boot, W.R., Blakely, D.P., & Simons, D.J. (2011). Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (226), 1–6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, F., Dyson, L., & Asela, T. (2008). Indigenous adoption of mobile phones and oral culture. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings: Cultural attitudes towards communication and technology (pp. 384–398). Perth, Australia: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
Brown, B., & Marin, P. (2009). Adolescents and electronic media: Growing up plugged in. Child Trends, 29, 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.childtrends.org/files/child_trends-2009_05_26_rb_adolelecmedia.pdfGoogle Scholar
DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and internet use by students in 2003. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006065.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Industry and Resources. (2006). Response to the Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts discussion paper on mobile connect: Improving regional mobile phone coverage. Perth, Australia: Author.Google Scholar
Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsdent, G., & Walker, A.J. (2011). Txt lang: Texting, textism use and literacy abilities in adolescents with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 49–57. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00397.xGoogle Scholar
Eagleson, R.D., Kaldor, S., & Malcolm, I.G. (1982). English and the Aboriginal child. Canberra, Australia: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
Exley, B.E. (2012). Valuing diversity: A multiliteracies project in a remote Indigenous community. In Henderson, R., (Ed.) Teaching literacies in the middle years: Pedagogies and diversity (pp. 236–266). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentile, D.A., Choo, H., Liau, A., Sim, T., Li, D., Fung, D., & Khoo, A. (2011). Pathological video game use among youths: A two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127 (2), 319–329. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1353Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J.M. (2008). Preschool television viewing and adolescent test scores: Historical evidence from the Coleman study. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (1), 279–323. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.279Google Scholar
Hainey, T., Connolly, T., Stansfield, M., & Boyle, L. (2011). The use of computer games in education: A review of the literature. In Felicia, P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation through educational games: Multidisciplinary approaches (pp. 29–50). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-60960-495-0.ch002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, K.N. (2010). Internet use and the concentration of disadvantage: Globalization and the urban underclass. American Behavioral Scientist, 53 (8), 111–1132.Google Scholar
Harambama, J., Aupersb, S., & Houtmanc, D. (2012). The contentious gap: From digital divide to cultural beliefs about online interactions. Information, Communication & Society, 4, 1–22. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.687006Google Scholar
Hargittai, E. (2008). The digital reproduction of inequality. In Grusky, D. (Ed.), Social stratification (pp. 936–944). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Harkins, J. (1990). Shame and shyness in the Aboriginal classroom: A case for practical semantics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 10, 293–306.Google Scholar
Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35 (8), 715–736.Google Scholar
Hofferth, S.L., & Moon, U.J. (2012) Cell phone use and child and adolescent reading proficiency. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1 (2), 108–122.Google Scholar
Homer, B.D., Hayward, E.O., Frye, J., & Plass, J.L. (2012). Gender and player characteristics in video game play of preadolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (5), 1782–1789. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.018Google Scholar
Jackson, L.A., von Eye, A., Witt, E.A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2011). A longitudinal study of the effects of internet use and video game playing on academic performance and the roles of gender, race and income in these relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 228–239.Google Scholar
Jansen, J. (2010). Use of the internet in higher income households. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP-Better-off-households-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.M. (2011). Internet activities and developmental predictors: Gender differences among digital natives. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10 (2), 64–76.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.M. (2012). Comprehension of Standard English text and digital textism during childhood. Internet Journal of Culture, Language and Society, 35 (1), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.educ.utas.edu.au/users/tle/JOURNAL/issues/2012/35-01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, R., & Lowrie, T. (2011). Both ways strong: Using digital games to engage Aboriginal learners. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17 (2), 130–142. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13603116.2011.605912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, D. (2012). New Indigenous TV channel for SBS. TVTonight. Retrieved from http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2012/05/new-indigenous-tv-channel-for-sbs.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kral, I. (2012). Talk, text and technology: Literacy and social practice in a remote Indigenous community. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lee, S.J., Bartolic, S., & Vandewater, E.A. (2009). Predicting children's media use in the USA: Differences in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27 (1), 123–143. doi:10.1348/026151008X401336Google Scholar
Lenhart, A. (2008). New Pew Internet/MacArthur Report on teens, video games and civics. Washington, USA: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2008/September/New-Pew-InternetMacArthur-Report-on-Teens-Video-Games-and-Civics.aspxGoogle Scholar
Lin, S.Y., & Overbaugh, R.C. (2009). Computer-mediated discussion, self-efficacy and gender. The British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 999–1013.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, M. (2010). Using television to improve learning opportunities for Indigenous Children. Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/indigenous_education/20Google Scholar
Martin, K. (2010). The intersection of Aboriginal knowledges, Aboriginal literacies, and new learning pedagogy for Aboriginal students. In Healy, A. (Ed.), Multiliteracies and diversity in education (pp. 58–81). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Notley, T.M., & Foth, M. (2008). Extending Australia's digital divide policy: An examination of the value of social inclusion and social capital policy frameworks. Australian Social Policy, 7. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12021/Google Scholar
Ofcom. (2011). A nation addicted to smartphones. London: Author. Retrieved from http://media.ofcom.org.uk/2011/08/04/a-nation-addicted-to-smartphones/Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochechouste, J., & Exell, M. (2012). Addressing the language and literacy needs of Aboriginal high school VET students who speak Standard Australian English as an additional language. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41 (2), 229–239.Google Scholar
Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2010). Aboriginal students engaging and struggling with critical multiliteracies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (4), 257–266.Google Scholar
Pirbhai-Illich, F., Turner, K.C., & Austin, T.Y. (2009). Using digital technologies to address Aboriginal adolescents’ education: An alternative school intervention. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 3 (2), 144–162.Google Scholar
Rideout, V.J. (2011). Zero to eight: Children's media use in America. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.Google Scholar
Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts, D.F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfmGoogle Scholar
Rennie, E., & Featherstone, D. (2008). The potential diversity of things we call ‘TV’: Indigenous community television, self-determination and NITV. Media International Australia, (129), 52–66.Google Scholar
Roberts, D., & Foehr, U. (2008). Trends in media use. Future of Children, 18 (1), 11–37.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.P. (2011). Arts and leisure participation among IT users: Further evidence of time enhancement over time displacement. Social Science Computer Review, 29 (4), 470–480.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., & Anderson, D. (2007). The impact of television on cognitive development and educational achievement. In Pecora, N., Murry, J., & Wartella, E. (Eds.), Children and television: Fifty years of research (pp. 65–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2012). Cell internet use 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Cell-Internet-Use-2012.aspxGoogle Scholar
Television Bureau of Canada. (2012). TV Basics. Toronto, Canada: Author. Retrieved from www.tvb.ca/page_files/pdf/InfoCentre/TVBasics.pdfGoogle Scholar
UNICEF. (2012). The state of the world's children: Children in an urban world. New York: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/sowc2012/index.phpGoogle Scholar
Vasan, A. (2010). Films and TV: Viewing patterns and influences on behaviour of college students (Health and Population Innovation Fellowship Programme Working Paper No. 13). New Delhi, India: Population Council. Retrieved from http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/wp/India_HPIF/013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51, 1392–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velaga, N.R., Beecroft, M., Nelson, J.D., Corsar, D., & Edwards, P. (2012). Transport poverty meets the digital divide: Accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 102–112.Google Scholar
Warburton, W., & Highfield, K. (2012). Children, media, and technology. In Bowes, J., Grace, R., & Hodge, K. (Eds.), (Children, families and communities: Contexts and consequences. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wei, L., & Blanks Hindman, D. (2011). Does the digital divide matter more? Comparing the effects of new media and old media use on the education-based knowledge gap. Mass Communication and Society, 14 (2), 216–235. doi:10.1080/15205431003642707Google Scholar
Zhong, Z-J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56 (3), 736–746. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.016Google Scholar